Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why It Was Smart For Obama To Postpone His Edwards Meeting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:50 PM
Original message
Why It Was Smart For Obama To Postpone His Edwards Meeting
The Clinton campaign is about to lose 3 more states tomorrow and they NEED Edwards' endorsement to stave off the bad news coming tomorrow night. An Edwards endorsement of Clinton would have done that. By postponing his meeting with Edwards Obama has played it perfectly because JE will wait to see what the Obama campaign is going to promise him before making any decision. Edwards WILL endorse Clinton-mark it down DUers because he will be offered the moon and stars. The bad news though is the fact that it won't really make any significant difference anyway-John Edwards is a fading star on the horizon-he waited a week too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shouldn't this be in GD:P?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. No I think it's right where it's supposed to be
it's not about the primaries it's a general discussion about political strategy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. GDP
oh, and I don't think Edwards would save those states anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
griffi94 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. it was smart
because obama did it....and anything he does is the smartiest thing ever....had hillary done it would be really really un-smarty
and arrogant as well...lol just jerkin yer chains
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just FYI, Washington DC is not a state
Isn't is Maryland, Virginia, and DC tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertee Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well O has got good OLE Ted..so Hillary can have the youthful JE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedStateProgressive Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. It will make a difference, I believe...
Because a lot of Edwards' former supporters (myself included) will finally have a place to go and a candidate to get behind. Even if Senator Clinton doesn't get win in those states tomorrow, an endorsement from John Edwards would give her a larger percentage of former Edwards voters, which could get her some more delegate.

Edwards is guaranteed a spot in the next administration, whether it's Obama or Clinton winning the election, because he's an honest, well-to-do politician that Middle Class voters and Lower Class voters can identify with better, not to mention the sheer amount of support from Labor. In a Clinton administration, I'd say he'd *ATLEAST* get Attorney General, maybe something more, though I'm not so sure. As for an Obama administration, I could see either Attorney General or Vice President going for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Keith just said Edwards postponed it because copters were circling his house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks for some truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. That truth was a threadstopper, I guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think neither you nor I know what's going on and am uncomfortable with your assertions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC