Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Politico/WJLA Interview: Clinton makes big play on seating the Michigan and Florida delegations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:44 PM
Original message
Politico/WJLA Interview: Clinton makes big play on seating the Michigan and Florida delegations
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 08:50 PM by flpoljunkie
Politico/WJLA interviews

“I think that both Michigan and Florida should count, because these are two states we have to carry,” she said. “This is not about so much as the ins and outs of the Democratic National Committee as to whether the Democrats are going to win in the fall.

“In Michigan, all of us had a chance to leave our names on the ballot – I chose to do so,” she continued. “My opponents ran a very vigorous campaign to get people to vote ‘uncontested.’ There was a campaign going on – it was a campaign against me, and I still won a majority.

“I think that the Democratic Party has to be looking very realistically about what it is we’re trying to achieve here. We need to win in November. … I think that both in Michigan and in Florida, the Democratic Party should really give these people who came out and voted – they weren’t involved in the rulemaking. Give them a chance.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. transparent AND pathetic
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. A fight over seating those will NOT be healthy for our general election prospects. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Va Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I agree, but I think it's coming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Hillary is not healthy for our general election prospects
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope she at least blushed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. She has an argument on Florida; her Michigan position is simply pathetic
I mean, c'mon people- this kind of power play is why so many dislike Hillary.

I don't think Florida should count because those were the rules announced at the outset of the game and you don't change them afterwards. But she at least has an argument here since Obama's name was on the ballot.

But to argue that she should get delegates from a contest where she was the only one on the ballot is beyond the pale. Hillary supporters should be embarassed to see the argument even made by her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. The math must mean that she needs Michigan now
No matter what. Her rhetoric on Michigan got ratcheted up big time. I would suggest for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Power play on her part. She does not care if it divides us.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why didn't she protest this BEFORE she "won" Michigan?
Any record of her balking at having MI and FL punished for breaking the silly party rules when the decision was originally made?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think she SHOULD get them seated.
You would too if your guy had won those states, be honest with yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. "You would too if your guy had won those states"
It may come as a surprise, but many of us actually have enough ethics to remain bound to an agreement all accepted before the election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. And the candidates did what they agreed to.
Show me where they agreed not to accept the eventual delegates if they got seated. You show me that and I take back my words and offer you a big apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Read WesDem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. New Republic editorial today
You can certainly debate the merits of the DNC’s move. What is beyond debate, though, is that all the major Democratic campaigns accepted this move without complaint. Clinton, along with her rivals, signed a pledge not to “participate” in the Michigan and Florida primaries.

But as soon as it became clear, in the wake of Iowa and on the eve of South Carolina, that Clinton potentially faced an extended battle for delegates, she began to demand that the rules be changed in the middle of the game. Her campaign has been arguing that the non-contested elections in Michigan and Florida should be made retroactively meaningful–and, therefore, that Clinton should be handed a gift of nearly 200 delegates. The Clinton team has wrapped its case in the logic of voter disenfranchisement. “I hear all the time from people in Florida and Michigan that they want their voices heard in selecting the Democratic nominee,” Clinton has said.

There is a perfectly cogent case to be made that Floridians and Michiganders deserve their say. (Some of our best friends and elderly relatives reside in those states.) The way to address this complaint is to schedule new elections so that candidates can advertise, make speeches, organize voters, distribute yard signs–you know, do “democracy,” a concept Clinton seems not to understand. The DNC, if it does decide to redress Clinton’s complaint, needs to do so immediately.

The New Republic hasn’t endorsed any candidate in this race. Our staff is divided, like the Democratic electorate.

But neutral observers can’t stand idly by as one campaign openly discusses stealing the nomination at the convention. Democrats need to recognize this potential gambit for what it is: a cynical, selfish hijacking of the democratic process. Clinton would not be laying the groundwork for this ploy unless it was potentially decisive. And the damage to Democrats (and democrats) would be profound. If Clinton is truly willing to trample so many institutions she professes to care about in pursuit of victory, she will have proven her enemies correct.


http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=65ed7d1f-b586-40d0-bc4c-48292494d4ef
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Pretty strong stuff, WesDem. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Okay, I am not loving Hillary here. Um, yuck. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's right and florida voted for her.
And we want our delegates seated accordingly. There is a fight between FDP and Dean/DNC. The fight isn't over yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Except she said they wouldn't count....
Hillary: MI is not going to count for ANYTHING.


NHPR's Laura Knoy: "So, if you value the DNC calendar, why not just pull out of Michigan? Why not just say, Hey Michigan, I'm off the ballot?"

Hillary Clinton: "Well, you know, It's clear, this election they're having is not going to count for anything"



http://www.nhpr.org/node/13858



Her logic for MI not counting also applies for FL too. Sorry...but them's the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. Like it or not, she's right. We tell Dem voters in these states their votes don't count, they won't
show up in Nov.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. But who told them they wouldn't count.
Hillary: MI is not going to count for ANYTHING.


NHPR's Laura Knoy: "So, if you value the DNC calendar, why not just pull out of Michigan? Why not just say, Hey Michigan, I'm off the ballot?"

Hillary Clinton: "Well, you know, It's clear, this election they're having is not going to count for anything"


http://www.nhpr.org/node/13858



Sounds like Hillary changed her mind to help herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. This deserves it's own thread.
You post, and I'll rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. It has it's own thread I will kick it up top fo ryou K and R....
It is funny.... no Clinton supporters will comment on it though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. won't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. What will we tell the children? - rules are negotiable?
It takes a village to piss on moral self discipline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. The Uncommited campaign only ran for a couple of days...
and they split their vote with Romney as to embarass McCain.

CAUCUS OR GIVE IT UP!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. get your stock from the makers of DEPENDS... b/c Obamazombies will shit their pants when it happens!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. They will not relinquish their grip on power without a bare-knuckle battle.
The harder they come...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC