Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 11:57 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Is Hillary Clinton a progressive? |
Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message |
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I would say yes as opposed to most repukes |
|
she's not progressive as me though :o
|
Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 12:02 AM by Drunken Irishman
But I think she's progressive enough.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. too corporate / war hawkish to me |
Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. Well I'm not supporting her, so I agree. |
|
Your name makes me want Skittles.
:)
|
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-11-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message |
2. She's liberal enough for me to vote for her |
|
but I still support Obama.
|
New Dawn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message |
4. No, she is a DINO. n/t |
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message |
6. It depends on your definition. |
|
Does she want "progress"? Again, what sort of progress?
"Progressive" is a label that means different things to different people.
I don't support Clinton, but I believe that she wants to change our current situation. The biggest issue I ahve with her (and, to a slightly lesser degree, Obama) is that she's trying to do it by using methods I deplore.
The entire system is broken and we're really not going to make substantive changes until we're willing to change it...and the "system" is where HRC gets all of her power.
|
gravity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Political issues are complex, and we shouldn't pigeonhole the candidates with simple labels.
|
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Really? I thought it invited some excellent discussion. |
|
Thanks for your contribution!
|
gravity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
16. It is a good question, but bad poll |
|
It just polarizes the discussion into an us vs them, black and white issue
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |
10. No. A progressive would lead on key progressive issues. She doesn't. She resists. |
|
Her behavior as senator is the reason I cannot see her carrying the liberal or progressive banner. She's all too ready to be an imperial president, a unitary president, who lacks any sense of restraint, or is compelled to follow law.
The conduct of her campaign the past 6 weeks has confirmed my worst fears of where she would take us and the country - DOWN. That's why I think she's poison for November.
|
gravity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. In her defense, she has to play politics |
|
You can have the most progressive agenda, but if no one in congress agrees with you, it doesn't matter. Politicians have to make compromises when they don't have the support of the entire nation.
|
Yael
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Not by the way I define "progressive" |
tandot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Progressive Score Clinton: 91.11%, Obama 88.37% |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 12:14 AM by tandot
www.ProgressivePunch.com Progressive Score for Clinton: 91.11% http://progressivepunch.yvod.com/members.jsp?search=selectName&member=NYI&chamber=Senate&zip=&x=35&y=7Progressive Score for Obama: 88.37% http://progressivepunch.yvod.com/members.jsp?search=selectName&member=ILIII&chamber=Senate&zip=&x=41&y=9For some reason, they gave Kucinich a score of 87.40%. I am not sure how correct the website is, though. ON EDIT: Here is a link to the discussion on dailykos. It seems that Clinton and Obama are not that much different. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/10/104656/506/937/434349
|
Alcibiades
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Both are moderate Democrats. What amazes me is that, in polls, 25% of peole think HRC is extremely liberal, vs 13% for BO. The fact that both are really centrist Dems show how little people understand politics.
|
tandot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Forgot to Recommend when I first posted. I hope more will K & R |
|
so I can check the discussion tomorrow morning. Good night :)
|
dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Crappy fake WalMart progressive, sure. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |