Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry, Kennedy, Obama , Biden, Dodd - YEA; Hillary: not voting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:42 PM
Original message
Kerry, Kennedy, Obama , Biden, Dodd - YEA; Hillary: not voting
We see who the true progressives in this party are when the Senate votes on matters such as these.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00015
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Feinstien let a real progressive into your seat you POS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The House can save us on this right?
Don't they have to approve as well? I hope our 231 does the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Apparently the house is more hostile to the immunity portion of the bill
So hopefully it will get dropped from the bill after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I hope they do their job,
I have to bug my critter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. She's still thinking that her votes could come back to bite her in the general
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Oh - I'm afraid you may be right. But wouldn't it be smarter, at this point,
to worry about not alienating potential voters while she's still not been named the nom?

Politics. Thank god WE'RE all sane and not involved in this racket! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Bite her in the general? You mean, bite her in the ass!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Was this today's vote? I haven't gotten caught up yet.
If so, I' surprised Hillary didn't participate - it's the right thing to do, for us and politically.

What say you, Clinton supporters? Thus far usually they ALL show for a vote, or they all don't,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Endorse that, John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Remind me. We have a majority, right?
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is a representative Democracy. Senators exercise the will of their constituency...period.
That's how we roll in America. So you can't really blame the Senator for his or her vote because it isn't him or her voting, it's the people that voted him or her into the office you need to blame for not being progressive enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. from my understanding..The US House of Rep's was meant to reflect..
the will of the people. In contrast, The US Senate was meant to be a more deliberative body. Weighing both the will of the people and the good of the nation.

but then again, what the hell do I know?? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. No, the Senate was meant to get small states to sign onto this idea called the United States.
A truly representative congress would be unicameral and would be completely proportional and it would represent people, not states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. yes, I agree w/ you on the small states...partly
But to further prove my original point, please look to the term limits. House is 2 years, Senate 6 years. That was instituted to make the Senate a deliberative body, free from the control of emotional issues that tend to occur within truly Representative body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. That's true. I would still be happier with a unicameral congress representing people, not states.
Any named party that could assemble at least, oh say, 100,000 supporters nationwide would be seated in the unicameral house with voting power proportionally equal to the number of members nationwide. If there were 20 partys in the house each with exactly 1,000,000 members, each party would wield exactly 5% of the overall power. If a simple majority were needed to pass legislation, at least 11 partys would have to agree to vote together. If there were 20 partys and they each had 1,000,000 membersexcept one had 2,000,000 (call it the gay party if you will), that party's vote would be equal to about two of the votes cast by one of the other partys. In this way, everyone in America receives representation, nobody gets left out in the cold, two party democratic dictatorship is avoided, and lobbyist types have little chance of influencing legislation. It is a more perfect union. It's pretty much my favorite made up form of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Is Hillary copying Obama by not voting?
Has she learned if you don't vote or vote present or hit the wrong button...
That no one can accuse you of voting for or voting against a controversial
issue. Good move Hillary...I always knew you were intelligent and a fast learner. Go Hillary Go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC