Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary worries me because she seems to win in only very blue states

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:14 PM
Original message
Hillary worries me because she seems to win in only very blue states
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 09:30 PM by Quixote1818
what good will that do us in the General election? :shrug: Obama is going to win those states anyway. And if Hillary gets blown out in purple states like Virginia then she may get blasted in November. Obama seems the safer bet for the General Election by a mile.

On Edit: If Obama could only win in red states we might have a problem but he has shown he can also take states like Minnesota, Connecticut, Delaware, Washington and swing states like Missouri and Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. But your post makes sense.
Aren't we supposed to be counterintuitive about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama pulled in more votes in Virginia tonight
than all three of the GOP candidates combined. Quite a statistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. And Obama wins only in states that McCain will take without breaking a sweat.
That's a problem, even if you don't see it. He hasn't proven that he will win those blue states, even if he asserts that all of Clinton's supporters will follow him like lemmings. They just might not. Especially if he doesn't bother to ASK them for their vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Sorry, both Hillary and Obama would crush McCain and his 100 year war in Iraq. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Like Kerry couldn't lose?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/02/03/elec04.prez.main/index.html

(CNN) -- Building on his momentum, Sen. John Kerry picked up five of the seven states holding contests for the Democratic presidential nomination Tuesday. Sen. John Edwards kept his White House dream alive with a win in South Carolina and a surprisingly strong showing in Oklahoma.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That makes no sense. For the Bush 29% to even acknowledge a Dem is blasphemy.
They will not even speak the "devils" name much less vote that way. Not even in jest.

This is real, it's across party lines and those voters will vote Obama in November.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. We'll see. I saw this same kind of Kerry Hubris around this time four years ago.
And we saw how that worked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Actually Obama has done very well in many blue states too
as I listed below. If he only won in red states you might have a point but he seems to win all different types in all parts of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Veeeerrrry Interesting!! (Shults would say) good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. You do realize these are democratic primaries, right?
With this line of reasoning, why even run a candidate?

John McCain has won more Blue States than Hillary or Obama.

What happens in primaries is not especially predictive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. But Obama has shown he can win in very blue states too
Minnesota, Washington, Connecticut, Maine, Delaware and swing states like Iowa and Missouri. If all he was winning was red states you might have a point but he has shown he can win north, south, east, west, red and blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Among Democrats, yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think the "red/blue" divide matters much in the primary.
It's about the number of people who'd vote Democrat vs. Republican in the general election that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Would comparing the numbers for the winning Dem vs Rep in each state be useful?
I'd like to see a table comparing the total number of voters for the frontrunner of each party, by state (since we can't assume all members of either party will vote in the GE).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. showing strength behind enemy lines is horrible!!
i guess?
i dont get that one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. she'd be running against McCain
not Obama. Don't compare two quite different things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Having less support among Democrats in purple states will most certainly
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 09:38 PM by Quixote1818
carry over to the general to some extent. If voter X didn't vote for Hillary in the Democratic primary are you seriously suggesting voter X is more likely to vote for Hillary over a Republican than he/she would vote for Obama over the same Republican? That is very unlikely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. You're assuming all those "crossover voters" -- the GOPs and the Indys--
are going to stay with the Dems in the general. That is a major error, to make that assumption.

Sometimes, those guys like to "shape the field" for the opposition, and then they go back to their own preferred team.

Remember, most of the GOP primaries are closed, so the only place a right leaning Indy can play the "Fuck YOU" game is in OUR primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bingo - this stuff about treating primaries like a GE was nuts.
Obama gets the BLUE states, hence, their bluishness. Obama's appeal in red/purple states is the kicker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. B-But I thought this was "black is white and up is down forum"!? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC