Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 09:57 PM
Original message |
All Hillary has to do is win Texas and Ohio and she's back in the game with the big MO |
|
Then she's on to Pennsylvania and will win with even more MO. 3 straight victories in huge states will solodify her support with the superdelegates. The supers will say do I want to go with the person who can win Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania or the one who can win a 9,000 person caucus in Alaska?
The choice will be obvious.
But I agree that if she loses 1 or both states, the party leaders and superdelegates will probably force her to drop out. Maybe they'll offer her support for Senate Majority Leader in the future if she bows out gracefully.
It's Texas and Ohio or bust.
|
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
1. That's been the plan all along |
|
Focus on the big states with lots of delegates and a strong base of Dem support.
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. waiting for a big state was Rudy Giuliani's strategy, too |
|
Unfortunately, if you lose before that, you also lose momentum.
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
16. Giuliani didn't win anywhere |
|
Hillary has won about a dozen states already. It may work for her.
|
earthlover
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
43. And obama will have won about that many SINCE SUPER TUESDAY! |
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
45. I know so Hillary may wind up like Giuliani |
|
But she is different than Giuliani in a very important respect. It is hard to say because Giuliani was the first to use that weird strategy.
|
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
54. Hillary has already won many states, Giuliani none |
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
18. Her plan was to knock Obama out on Super Tuesday |
|
Whatever plan she has now, it's certainly plan B.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
25. Exactly. Like Bush, she had no plan B. Poor judgement shines through again. n/t |
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
31. Despite what the MSM says I do think she has a plan B |
|
And I don't count her out by any means. But I think her plan B could've been much better. Obama is sweeping and that means he gets good press all week. Even if she could've pulled an upset in one state this week it would've weakened Obama quite a bit.
|
WillYourVoteBCounted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
47. Easy to rig Texas and Ohio |
|
How do you think Bush ever got elected Governor or Texas? And now they have lots of paperless machines.
Oh, and Ohio - Cuyahoga County's ballots won't be counted at the polling places, they will be hauled off two times that day to be counted at the county office.
What will happen to those ballots in transit?
Guess.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
51. I don't think Obama's people are going to let that happen. n/t |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
49. This has nothing to do with what the MSM says. SHE said she planned to wrap it up by |
|
Super Tuesday. She said it (in different words) after her earlier losses. It's obvious by the fact she had so much money in the beginning and ran out. Her donors maxed out. She went with big donors thinking she'd have all she needed by Feb. 5th. She's justifying all Obama's wins with one excuse or another-very ungracious of her. People are leaving her campaign or being shuffled around. This was clearly not planned.
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
46. Or...at this point in time....it could be Plan C, D, or E! n/t |
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #53 |
64. You do have a valid point there! |
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
24. She can't win by a large enough margin of delegates. Or was her plan all along to steal MI & FL? |
YDogg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message |
2. All a bullfrog needs are wings ... |
|
... so he won't bump his ass on the ground when he jumps.
|
thunder rising
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Now that's one big IF after a month of loses. |
Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. they are not fair contests |
|
caucuses are undemocratic.
Virginia, MD, DC are not winnable for a white candidate when blacks block vote 90%-10%.
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
17. So Obama only wins because of blacks or caucuses? |
muntrv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
22. Then explain Obama's wins in Nebraska, Iowa, states with mostly white people. |
Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
muntrv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
30. They still count and Obama still got delegates. |
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
gmudem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
40. Obama won the majority of white, women, and latino voters |
|
in Virginia. What is your excuse for that?
|
returnable
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message |
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
6. If my aunt had wheels she'd be a pastry cart. |
|
And the people in Hell want icewater.
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Indeed, she looks good in OH, but Obama will pull it out. |
|
TX and PA are wildcards, but I believe Obama will crush her in both states by getting 40% or more of the votes, which doesn't let her have as many delegates as she otherwise would have had. She needs to push Obama below 40% and even then she's going to still be in trouble.
|
Hawkeye-X
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
9. It's getting to the point where she needs to do more than just win there |
|
She has to win BIG there and I'm not sure she can.
|
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. We'll hate it come November too. |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
mudesi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Wrong: She has to win them by LARGE margins |
|
If they're close, she doesn't gain any ground.
|
NoBorders
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Yep. As one commenter put it, she's 'all in' in TX and OH n/t |
rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
15. She'll have to win them BIG, though |
|
All Obama has to do is stay close.
:headbang: rocknation
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:02 PM
Original message |
lancer78
(109 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
19. And all Giuliani had to do was win FL. n/t |
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Except she'd have to win by huge margins to win enough delegates. Not going to happen |
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
21. She can no longer get by just winning all those states |
|
Now that she's lost so many in a row by huge margins she has to blow Obama out in votes and delegates to have a chance.
A 5% to 10% win in any of those states wont do it anymore.
|
democrat2thecore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
23. That's ---- " A L L " ???? It's a rough ride to victories there w/ Obama Momentum -nt |
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Maybe...but momentum may be with Obama. If he wins WI next week |
|
and splits Ohio and Texas (I'm now thinking TX may be more doable than Ohio)and is within a few points of HRC in the other then it's going to be tough for her. Obama's strategy of running a 50-state campaign and not just concentrating on the "big states" is paying off. Even if HRC won both TX and OH if Obama is close in both he gets a sizable amount of delegates. I think he takes one of them.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
Since super tuesday we've had 7 contests.
Washington 36 Louisiana 22 Nebraska 35 Maine 20 Virginia 28 Maryland 26 DC 51
The numbers following the states?
The margin of victory. :woohoo:
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
27. "the party leaders and superdelegates will probably force |
|
her to drop out"? why in the hell would they do that?
|
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
32. To unite the party against the GOP |
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message |
29. She's been losing momentum. Steadily. |
|
She looks like a loser, at this point. If she loses Wisconsin...that makes EIGHT Primary or caucus losses in a row. And a total deficit in pledged delegates that means she needs a margin of victory OVER 60% in TX and OH in order to retake the lead.
It ain't happening.
|
kennetha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
36. She should contest Wisconsin. Demographics more favorable |
|
Now way in heck she had even a ghost of a chance in the Potomac primaries. 37% of MD democratic electorate is AA; 30% in VA and probably more than 50% in DC. Obama gets 90% of that vote, giving him a huge insurmountable lead. Best Hilary could hope for is to draw a respectable number of delegates and keep from getting totally swamped.
|
yeswecan08
(134 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
33. Obama has so much momentum now - game over for the Clintons |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
37. I said this almost a week ago. Obama supporters were in denial. |
|
It's good that they can finally accept that they're winning.
|
kennetha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
41. She's in for some bad press certainly |
|
But "momentum" is a myth here. What's happened is a walk through a demographically diverse landscape of primaries and caucuses. Seems to me that who wins and who loses depends entirely on the demographics o the democratic electorate in the relevant primary or caucus. The states coming up are substantially more favorable to Clinton.
Of course, the media is going to pick up the Hillary in "collapse" meme and Obama riding a wave of momentum meme. That right there may alter the landscape a bit.
|
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
34. I'm a white woman from Ohio and I am confident from the folks I've talked to that |
|
OBAMA will be the next president of the United States! It's overwhelming and it's contagious!
Best of all, as someone who has little faith in our current election system, I believe we will have the numbers to overcome a bad system.
|
WillYourVoteBCounted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
48. what about Cuyahoga County? |
|
you know that the ballots won't be counted at the polling places, right?
They will be hauled off mid day to begin counting at the county office, and then again at the end of the day.
This leaves the ballots open to fraud.
|
nomorewhopper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message |
38. that's all she has to do? |
|
gonna be a long, hard road
|
CreekDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Mr. Munster, by how much does she have to win TX and OH to win? |
|
What will her margins be?
|
burythehatchet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
61. say MISTERMUNSTER 5 times reallt fast n/t |
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
But she won't. I hope you and everyone else now is at least preparing for further hurt. As a life-long Patriots fan, I can only relate that it only took me a few days to get over it, despite the utter shock, disbelief, and hurt that endured for the first couple of days.
If it helps, you should all know it's not your fault. You had no hand in her mismanaged campaign and huge misjudgment of her opponent(s). It's her fault that she's in the position she's in, and you had no hand in it whatsoever. :hug:
|
ellisonz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message |
44. The Hillary campaign is in decay. |
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
50. Texas is caucus and Primary right? |
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
52. Hillary will lose Texas by 15 points, and that will be the knockout punch for her campaign. |
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
60. She's already staggering around punch-drunk |
|
Whether she gets knocked out or collapses of her own accord, well, who's to say what the future holds. :P
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #60 |
63. She's got a standing eight count going on right now. |
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
66. If they need to count to 8, she's got one more number left |
DemGa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message |
55. Sorry Obamacrats, TX and OH are in the bag for Hillary |
|
And I'm gonna laugh my ass off when you lose.
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #55 |
65. Wrong. Obama will win Texas. |
|
And you'll cry like Hillary when she tells you it is over.
|
L0oniX
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message |
57. Well it's good to have hopes and goals and dreams. n/t |
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #57 |
62. You're forgetting that they don't believe in those. |
Elsylee
(4 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I totally agree with you. The media is partially to blame with what is going on within the Democratic party. He wouldn’t have these results if it wasn’t for them. It is obvious they are pushing Obama no matter what. Isn't the media supposed to be somewhat objective? Aren’t we (the public) supposed to make up our minds by ourselves as to who is the best candidate? Why aren’t they reporting information such like: http://thecityedition.com/Pages/Archive/Winter08/2008Election.htmlhttp://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/08/09/pacs_and_lobbyists_aided_obamas_rise/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/03/us/politics/03exelon.html?_r=3&pagewanted=1&hp&oref=sloginhttp://obamatruth.org/They throw trash at every other candidate while painting Obama as a saint. BTW check out “Beating a Dead Donkey” on http://www.savagepolitics.com
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message |