Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Article: "Obama and Progressive Change"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:36 PM
Original message
Article: "Obama and Progressive Change"
Published on Tuesday, February 12, 2008 by CommonDreams.org
Obama and Progressive Change
by Dave Lindorff

EXCERPT:

I would also suggest that while Sen. Obama may well be part of the party Establishment- with a record as a safe backer of the status quo- if he succeeds in winning the nomination, and especially if he goes on and wins the White House, it will be because he has aroused a huge pool of voters in this country who had until now been cynically staying away from politics. It will be because he has transcended the racial divide that has stymied real political change for so long.

And the forces that are propelling him toward the nomination, and toward the White House, are forces that will not easily be denied if they succeed.

That is to say, a President Barack Obama, whatever his own political beliefs (and we don’t really know much about the man), could well find himself, thanks to the movement that puts him in power, freed from the shackles of the Democratic Leadership Council and the army of advisors of stasis and corporatism that cling to most Democratic political figures like barnacles to a rotting pier.

For this to happen, Obama will first have to reach out beyond his current base of support, to rank-and-rile workers‹both unionized and non-union–to Latinos and other minority groups, and to older Americans. He’ll have to reach out, that is, to the groups that have thus far still been backing Hillary Clinton and the party Establishment. He need not win all those groups over to his side- in fact it would be better if he didn’t. He needs only to win over the disaffected within those groups- the people who recognize that they have been betrayed by the two parties and by the System.

Should this happen- and it probably will have to happen for this first serious black candidate for the presidency to successfully beat back the Clintonians and the DLC, who will try to kill off his candidacy before the convention- Obama will have been, perhaps in spite of himself, or perhaps because there is in him still some spark of insurgency, transformed into a real agent of progressive change.

None of this means that a President Obama would be a new Franklin Roosevelt. The pressures on any president to “cool it” and play the game of supporting the big moneyed interests that have been undermining and hollowing out America for decades are enormous. But certainly an alternative reality is also possible- namely that an aroused and newly empowered bloc of voters, in bringing a black politician to the pinnacle of power in America, could tip the balance and free that new president from outside of the White Establishment to follow his better instincts. (Franklin Roosevelt himself, remember, was no Franklin Roosevelt when he ran for office; the movement that installed him in office made him into the transformative New Deal figure he became.)

Progressives cannot be naive about this. Even if I’m right, for a Barack Obama administration to become the dawn of a genuine progressive era, it would demand tremendous organizing and continuous political campaigning after Election Day. There will surely be a serious effort by the political Establishment- both on Wall Street and inside the Beltway- to rein in both a new president and the forces that put him there. And Obama himself- clearly no visceral radical–will need to be convinced that the path to a second term lies through heeding his populist base, not through reaching accommodation with the sclerotic old guard.

That is a call-to-arms, though, not a reason to ignore this possibility.

What I’m suggesting here is that Barack Obama’s campaign, by its very rhetoric of change, may be creating something bigger than Barack Obama, and that Barack Obama may never have intended: a powerful constituency for real change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. in short, if he gets the will of the people
he doesnt need the cash of corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He speaks of a Mandate. When elected, he will have that power behind him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. He'll also be pressured to actually serve the people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. A Transformation, a new trajectory
Ending Reaganism, not triangulating it the way the Clintons did.

Uh yeah, he said that in Nevada. He knows exactly what he wants to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yeswecan08 Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama mandate comes from the love of the people - no other politician can deny him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I was just reading an Atlantic article on Clinton that made reference to how
campaign finance reform removed the soft money and how the Clinton's got caught off guard about how Obama could match them in fundraising.

Campaign finance reform (and we need more) + the internet = power of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. A lot of little contributions...
...would sure be better than a few big ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bingo!
I think this article is right on target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. There will be no change regardless of who wins
Because the problem is systemic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckley_v._Valeo">Until this supreme court ruling is overturned, there will be no change, just hot air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. I can understand where David
Lindorff could see this manifesting..I hope we get a chance to find out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. It;s similar to what The Nation magazine said in its endorsement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's similiar to my
thought processes too. We haven't been through this 8 year nighmare without giving long and hard thought to how it will end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. HA!
We progressives will make him into the leader we need him to be. And he will like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Exactly!
People tend to rise to the occasion.

We KNOW the entrenched crap we will get with
a Clinton administration.

Obama has a chance to cauterize the DLC, and
I'm all for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. yep, it is sad to see progressives compromising with a candidate they know isn't what they want and
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 02:48 PM by jsamuel
acting like he is or that they can change him. I know Edwards wasn't perfect but he was a progressive candidate. Obama is no progressive and people who think he is or that he is going to magically change into one when he gets elected are going to be in for a surprise if he wins. He will tear the progressive movement apart because people will want to be loyal and that means doing away with that which progressives want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC