Obama won 21 states + DC ... Hillary won 10 states.

[Hieronymus]

[GarbagemanLB]

1. Obama's don't count. They were black, caucuses, and red states.

lol.

[XemaSab]

3. Unlike Oklahoma and Nevada

:eyes:

[tritsofme]

2. McCain could very easily win 30 states and still lose the GE

Number of states doesn't really mean anything.

There's a reason the delegate count is neck and neck despite Obama winning a bunch of small states.

[OzarkDem]

4. Ridiculous

the primaries are far from over.

[JCMach1]

5. Why then he should have a 2:1 lead in popular vote

and delegates. Ummmmm wait a minute...

[jackson_dem]

6. Land doesn't vote. People do. What are the popular vote totals?

Bush won about 30 states both times. Does that mean he "won" against Gore? He won more states right?

[chascarrillo]

13. There are no popular vote totals.

[Dogmudgeon]

7. 21 + 10 = _____ (Note: There are 50 states and 5 territories)

--p!

[ClintonTyree]

8. Do you happen to know....

the total combined population of each candidates' "states" won? :shrug: Just interested, that's all.

[XemaSab]

9. I'd be interesting in knowing how many of Hillary's "winning" totals you'd have to add up

in Nevada, Arkansas, Okalahoma, Arizona, etc to equal the 1.75 MILLION Obama supporters in California, a state he "lost." :shrug:

[ShortnFiery]

10. Tis true, Obama is also leading in BOTH "The Popular Vote" & "People Delegate" counts.

;)

However, it's not over by a long shot, so please stay FIRED-UP fellow Obama supporters?!?

Go Obama! :patriot: :hi:

[Darth_Kitten]

11. Then why are they almost tied for delegate count?

There's a difference from winning California than winning, say, Maine or DC.

[stahbrett]

12. They are not almost tied, unless you add in super-delegates, which makes it closer (eom)