Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Experience?" Here were some more experienced women who never got the chance.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:58 AM
Original message
"Experience?" Here were some more experienced women who never got the chance.
Hillary's only political experience, on her own, was seven and a half years in the Senate. She never held political office before, not even on the local level.

Here are some other women who've run for President:

Margaret Chase Smith spent 9 years in the House and 15 in the Senate before she ran for her party's nomination for President in 1964, losing to Barry Goldwater (who Hillary organized for). That's 26 years of real national experience.

Shirley Chisholm spent five years in the New York Legislature and three in the House before running for President in 1972, losing the nomination to George McGovern. That's slightly more experience than Hillary has, and she was seen as too much of a lightweight. That's a pity because anyone who ever heard Shirley speak could honestly testify to her ability to inspire.

Pat Schroeder served in Congress for fifteen years before launching her Presidential campaign in 1988. She was considered too much of a lightweight and forced to withdraw before any primaries could be held.

So how does seven and a half years in the only office she was ever elected to translate into "35 years of experience," and qualify Hillary to be President when these three, eminently more qualified women, were never given the chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. If experience guaranteed the Presidency, Robert Byrd would be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. Worse Yet, It Looks Like Hillary's Signed All Other Experienced Women Into Her Suicide Pact
"Hillary or Bust" and I hate to see what happens after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. This argument makes no sense to me.
In fact, it could be a seen as an argument in favor of Hillary Clinton.

Why were other, arguably more experienced women never given a shot at the presidency? Isn't it obvious? Because of bias against women. Why should Hillary Clinton be denied a shot at the presidency because other women were denied it?

To make an analogy, your argument is like saying that Barack Obama should be denied the presidency because Frederick Douglass had more experience, but he never served as president. Or Charlie Rangel. Or MLK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good point
Obama is doing very well now. Specious arguments against Hillary won't help him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC