Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Should Pick A Woman As His Veep

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:29 PM
Original message
Obama Should Pick A Woman As His Veep
That would make women happy and be a good covering your bases move. It would also be historic in its own right. There are plenty of qualified women to fill the spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama/Obama Girl in 2008! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. Obama girl did not vote for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Obama girl didn't vote at all -- just to be clear (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
56. Well, does she have a sister?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. It would "make women happy"?
Wow, that remark is offensive on so many levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Read: that would finally shut them up about this.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. Nonsense
It has been pointed out time and again that HC is going for the female vote and that women are supporting her in great numbers. The reason for that is obvious. As a woman I would love to see a woman have the top job, but if the giant mo goes against that, I would love to see the first female vice in history. As for the pandering mentioned downthread, there are a lot of woman in this country more than qualified for the position and who are more than up to the job, thus making it a smart move to my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
51. Yeah. Because we're shallow like that and stuff.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. There are women on DU who have admitted as much.
Quite a few, actually, who have stated that they primarily support Hillary because she's a woman and they want a woman president. They support her because they're energized that a woman actually has a shot at the top spot.

And yes, I happen to agree that it's a shallow position. When you basically admit, "I'm voting for X because she doesn't have testicles," it does tend to make others question your judgement.

FOR THE RECORD, I happen to hold the same opinion of those who support Obama simply because he's black.

Leaders should be chosen for their ability to lead, not their gender, race, or religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. I've stated here more than once
That supporting candidate solely because they're female/black is just as asinine as refusing to support a candidate because they're female/black. I don't get people who do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. He should pick a man or a woman for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. My God, you're right!
If he picks a woman, then I will be a convert in a second. I mean, one woman is the same as another, right? I support Hillary but if Obama picks any other woman, that will make me happy because I'm a woman and any other woman = Hillary.


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Your vagina will be jumping up and down with joy.
What is with people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
57. As of your post... this thread is officially useless without pictures!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Presumably, you'd be a convert because he'd be our NOMINEE if he picked a running mate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
griffi94 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. yeah condi rice
then he'll get the women and the repubs...oh yeah and african americans too :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. What do you think
of Anthony Zinni?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not woman-y enough...
...think harder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Zinni's not a woman
But he'd make a great Veep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I think that
he may be the choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. No, he should win the nomination first. Then worry about VP selection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Oh, please, minor details.
Heck, I wouldn't put it past him to choose Condi, since he's already said he could see inviting Colin Powell back (RED FLAG alert to me!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Do you REALLY not see the difference
between Rice and Powell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Colin Powell who is a yes man who lied to Congress and the UN
and embarassed us in the eyes of the world. He also allowed his credibility to be exploited to help push Congress into voting for the IWR.

He started his career with a cover up of the My Lai massacre.

Bill Clinton asked him to stay on as Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He refused. I have also heard that it was Powell who refused to implement gays serving openly in the military.

When he was SOS, he stood by and did not make a peep on behalf of the American people when his son was FCC chairman and tried to shut the public out of the airwaves - even though he stood to benefit greatly if such a change to media ownership rules took place due to the large amount of Time-Warner stock he owned.

I dislike both Powell and Rice, but I am tired of people acting as if he's some kind of plaster saint. I reject the notion of a Democrat taking Powell on in his or her administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. I do not think Powell is saint
far from it. But I do not think he is a consistent and remorseless political whore like Rice, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't want Obama to pander to anyone
when he wins this thing outright...he should choose whoever fits the bill and HE wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. True, he took care of that in South Carolina already with McClurkin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. Pandering Has Nothing To Do With It
Unless you think a woman couldn't fit the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Medea Benjamin.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. Obama needs an attack dog. He needs some one like Jim Webb
But Bill Richardson not endorsing anyone is a serious sign that he has been told by both he will be on their top list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. How's a 4-star general for an attack dog?
Clark is much too dignified and classy to be a prototypical "attack dog", but I think even McCain would be in bit of awe of him. He can't treat Clark like an ignorant whippersnapper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. You know I would love it if it was Wes Clark
but his loyalty to the Clinton's likely eliminates him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. LOL
My first thoughts were Richardson and Webb as well

1) Qualified
2) Play the attack dog role well
3) Bring critical states in line

Though Webb going to the White house could mean the loss of a senate seat in 2010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. McCain will probably put a woman (Condi?) on his ticket ...there go the indies & Dem women/nt
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 01:41 PM by Iceburg
52% of the population have been waiting a v e r y - l o n g time to have their voices heard.
Since we are now "One America" I know where those votes will be going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. Exactly
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. I vote for Natalie Mains. Just for spite.
I think she'd be good insurance, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. Oh geez
Obama should pick the person he will trust to work with him - challenge him if necessary - and be prepared to take his place if necessary.

Not necessarily a woman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
26. what do you think women are that fucking stupid to not see through that shit..I hope he does do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndieLeft Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. It doesn't have to be Hillary... Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. Madeline Albright?
She'd make up for his Foreign Policy experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. She's not eligible
she was born in Czechoslovakia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. How about Sen Barbara Boxer? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Excellent
There are so many possibilities
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. Seconded. She's a great choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
47. No thank you.
I don't want Arnie to appoint himself to Boxer's seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent-Voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. So plumbing is your main consideration for a VP slot?
Please tell me you're not voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #36
59. It's Called Targeting A Demographic
So instead of picking a veep because he's a military man or can bring in a big state, why not choose someone that a MAJORITY of the population can relate to? And anyone who thinks it wouldn't be a consideration is kidding themselves. It might not determine a final vote but it would be considered, even by republican women. Women have been waiting a long time to have a seat in the halls of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
39. he needs someone with military experience...like Wes Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
40. Sorry
But Obama should pick the qualified person who brings the most to a ticket...

If its a woman so be it, if its a man so be it...

--

Personally I think Webb would be a great choice solid creds and he brings VA to the table, Richardson would also be a good choice (bringing NM to the table)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cadwallader Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
42. Qualified women
As long as she has these qualifications, which I believe Obama needs on his ticket:

Minority heritage of a major demographic not African-American
Governor or Senator
Previous Diplomatic experience
Service In Clnton or Carter Administrations
Served in the Military

Anyone spring to mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. You need to ad Geography
Someone from a barely red state in 04 would be nice (NM, VA, MO) or one of the big three (OH, FL, PA)..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiamondJay Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
45. thats called "unelectable"
a black or a woman is enough change for most americans. both on a ticket is too much. and I am talking about your average middle american, of course us libs wouldn't mind, but Joe Sixpack will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
46. The ticket should be Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama
You want to unite the party? That's the way to do it. I'd rather see Obama/Clinton. He's got the vision, she's got the experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
48. Shall we try the reverse??? Clinton should pick a black man as his veep...
That would make black people happy and be a good covering your bases move. It would also be historic in its own right. There are plenty of qualified black guys to fill the spot.

boy! I don't know about you, but that doesn't sound so good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. Janet Napolitano ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. no foreign affairs or national security experience /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
50. Campbell Brown
Hey, at least she'll be easy on the eyes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
52. No I think its clear that if we're going to win it has to be Clinton
The ticket HAS to be Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton.

Anything else would sacrifice the momentum we have. We can cream the GOP 2/3 if we keep it up.

When momentum dies, it doesn't come back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amimnoch Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
54. Words cannot express how disheartening sentiments like this is
Aren't we supposed to be progressives? Aren't we supposed to be beyond picking candidates based on race, gender, and other physical attributes?

Call me crazy, but voting for Senator Obama because he's half black (or even if he was all black), to me is every bit as wrong as someone who votes against him for the same reasons.

Voting for Senator Clinton because she's a woman to me is every bit as wrong as somone who votes against her because she's a woman.

I propose that BOTH candidates will make an excellent choice for our leadership, and I deeply hope either, once nominated will select their running mate based on considerably more than such shallow perception based conditions. I hope the nominee looks purely at the best qualified candidate as their running mate without regard to gender, race, orientation, or other non intellectual, or capability based traits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC