Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why doesn't Obama concede?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:35 PM
Original message
Why doesn't Obama concede?
He needs to move out of the way since this race is so close and let someone who can take on the Republicans get down to business already. Let's be pragmatic about it.........Obama is not tough enough to win the Presidency. He's been handled with kid gloves by the Democrats and is in no way prepared to face the Republican Smear & Dirty Tricks Machine once it's turned on.

Democrats went with their heart with Kerry. It's time we start using our brains for a change.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because he's winning.
As opposed to Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Kind of like that scene in The Search For The Holy Grail
the Monty Python movie where the knight gets all his arms and legs chopped off and then says "come back here you coward and I'll bite your legs off"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. That's SO "Old Politics"
Get with the program!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. He's winning by too much though
This is about 50.0001% not 20 and 30 point blowouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. He's winning by over 100 delegates.
Which, I think, is good enough reason to not drop out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. You are not thinking strategically
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 02:14 PM by Yael
You see -- he gets out NOW and she can make up ground and get the win that is hers for the taking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. SERIES! OMG!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Well my reasons are better than..........
...all the patently stupid reasons I have seen for Hillary to give up what, whether you realize it or not is a neck and neck race.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't worry.
He will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. He'll concede in an argument with his wife in 2016 about where to build his presidential library.
That's when he will "concede."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've said this before and I will say it again... If Hillary's name were Rodam...
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 01:38 PM by LakeSamish706
instead of Clinton, she would not even be in a race for the Presidency... She is and always has been running on her husbands name recognition and nothing else.

And as a mater of fact, she probably wouldn't be a Senator either for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Doesn't it drive you slightly nuts that on the one hand Hillary says
That she is experienced and she knows how to get things done and then on the other hand she whines about being a victim?

Give the woman some cheese for that whine!

I'd give her snaps for her "getting things done" if for instance her Natinal Health Plan had gone through. But no, the big bad repugs bashed her little plannee and she had to give up on it. That's how effetive she was!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. You can make the same argument
if Obama wasn't black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mathewsleep Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
easy_b94 Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. WOW give it up all ready
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. noooooooo.....
the point is that Obama needs to give it up. Reading comprehension is your friend.:*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
69. Who made that point?
I haven't seen that point being proven yet. I haven't seen a good reason for EITHER of them to get out of the race yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gotta give you points for chutzpah
Coming on here and suggesting that Obama drop out after he trounced Clinton by at least 20 points in three primaries last night takes guts...gotta give you credit for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I was thinking more like stupidity actually! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
50. Naaaaaaaaah.....
I'm not stupid........but I have seen some around here that don't catch on real fast.:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Thanks.......
I try.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wasn't Kerry more of a "head" guy?
Kerry used to talk on and on about obscure aspects of policy. He tended to overthink his remarks. To me, he had intellectual appeal but specifically lacked "heart", which made him seem cold and aloof.

If anything, it was the Republicans who went with the heart and turned off the brain in '04, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Yeah
Kerry didn't have that likability and charisma that Barack has. He was boring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. No, the Republicans have never had any brains.
Trust me on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Or hearts, for that matter.
Or hearts, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
70. You are correct
Dean or Kucinich were the "heart" guys. And the party tried to rip our hearts out and force Kerry on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. He surely does concede
that his campaign is on fire !!!! : - )))))))

And he's tough enough to take care of himself thank you very much
but I'm sure he'd appreciate it if we'd all watch his back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. That would be rather unprecedented. Win 8 states in a row and then concede...
Walk away from the bong, junior.

Walk away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
40. I inhaled........
And I like it.:evilgrin:

It fills me with hope.:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csorman Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. That explains it all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. because some of us want an actual electable candidate to represent the Dems
Hillary is by far the weaker candidate in a GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think they should both concede
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 01:41 PM by FlyingSquirrel
and let Edwards have it.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndieLeft Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Um........ I know why! HE'S WINNING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. Those Obama folks--sharp as tacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Quick on the uptake, too!
O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think Clinton and Obama should both concede
so that Lee L. Mercer Jr. can stop being just the secret President of the USA and be the REAL President of the USA (all three)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shugah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
52. there is one issue that Lee L Mercer Jr does not address
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 02:56 PM by shugah
and i think it will be a real achilles heel for him if he doesn't clear it up. when Lee L Mercer Jr becomes president of Government #2 in addition to Government #1, does that mean jeb bush will be all in the white house with disease? i can't figure that out, which is hard to believe, since Lee L Mercer Jr is always so clear about everything (All Three).

edit: speilling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RunningFromCongress Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. Dems went with their brains w/ Kerry, don't twist history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Looky....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
death to the DLC Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. Not tough enough?
Are you kidding? Have you ever tried your hand at union organizing? Let alone in the streets of Chicago? He's tough enough and then some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. Why don't we just keep Bush?
that way you don't have to worry about the big, bad, Republicans. What is has always been and will always be, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. Umm...because THE VOTERS want him as the nominee? (more & more overwhelmingly now)
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 01:52 PM by jmg257
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
30. Actually, if you remember 04 a little more closely, Kerry's MAIN selling point in the primary ...
campaign was his supposed electability, especially in contrast to perceptions of Dean and Kucinich. Electability is NOT the meme of people voting "with their heart", although in practice people are ROUTINELY stampeded into something like that, for the purposes of defeating a peace candidate or some other version of "doing the job" in US politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
62. Which is exactly what happened
In '04, the "with their heart" position was essentially anyone but Bush. The insiders kept circulating the meme that Kerry was more electable than Dean, and then the media followed up on it. It convinced the voters to go with Kerry, even though I believe that Dean would have been a much more formidable opponent for Bush, especially on the issues. The problem is that after the "Dean scream", and the ridicule that he got, people ran away from him as fast as they could. Without that, '04 could have been exactly like '08, a protracted primary battle between the two remaining candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
33. he seems to have held up well against the Clinton "Smear & Dirty Tricks Machine"
Isn't it about time for you to aim your sights at the real enemy, McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
36. So a candidate who can't beat him can beat McCain?
Seems like an odd statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
39. As Steve Martin said to Lily Tomlin in All of Me, "Ahhh...good plan!"
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
41. We supposedly went for "electable" with Kerry.
Should've gone with our hearts. In the end, the electable person is the one who really gets people excited, not the one who is the most vanilla or centrist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. Soooooooo if Kerry was 'electable'......
and he thought he knew what he was doing......then why did he not get elected.......and why is he endorsing Obama now telling us all that he knows best? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. Well, that's my point - "electable" is a term injected by the establishment
bigwigs. It's usually used as a ruse when their anointed candidate is weak and bland - like Kerry. Kerry won the election but gave it away by not protesting Ohio and numerous other stolen areas. Therefore he's weak. He may have been strong years ago but somehow he lost his strength.

THough I am an Obama supporter, Kerry's endorsement made me think twice about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. Clintons did a GREAT job of trying to help Kerry in 2004
They left him hanging out to dry is more like it. Calculating for the Clinton birthright Presidency in 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
42. huffing is bad for you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. I'm a fat old babyboomer.......
We huff a lot.:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. lol!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
43. Frustrating, isn't it? Why doesn't he just realize he's a loser after all those wins?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
45. "It's time we start using our brains for a change."
You're right.

Barack has the most delegates.
He has won eight primaries in a row.
He has won more states.
He wins red states, blue states, states with blacks, states without blacks, states in the north, west, south and east.
He just won 55% of the white male vote in Virginia, home of the capital of the Confederacy.
He wins among independents, garners moderate republicans and draws young voters.
He's far better financed.
He draws crowds usually reserved for participants of indoor professional sporting events.
He's the best speaker this country has seen in years.
His policies and votes are generally progressive.
He basically muzzled Bill Clinton, one of the best and toughest politicians in the Democratic Party.

He grew up multiracial in a one race world, with no father, relying heavily on his maternal grandparents. He had an easy childhood.

He should quit now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
47. We're using out heads. Thats why we're not going to nominate someone
who energizes the Repukes and doesn't attract independents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miceelf Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
53. LOL
I'll point out that when an Obama supporter starts a similar thread suggesting that Clinton get out, people get all upset about the "cult" and the "arrogance" and whatnot.

Why should this get different treatment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
54. Because he has always had more elected delegates. Why doesn't Hillary step down, she can't win
All she ever had was her husband's Cronies who are Super delegates and said they would vote for her.

Face it, in Iowa she came in 3rd and Obama came in first. In N.H. she won the popular vote but it was so close that they both got the same number of delegates. In Nev. she won the popular vote but he won one more delegate than she did. He then won S.C. (both popular vote and delegates) then on Feb. 5th he won a few more delegates than she did. Since then he has won 8 straight (both popular vote and delegate count) and should win 2 more to make it 10 straight.


At no time has she been ahead in elected delegates. On no day has she won more delegates than Sen. Obama.


To Win you must.... WIN... delegates.....she can't seem to do that.


She should just pay back the five million dollars she loaned herself and hang it up. She bas begun to embarrass herself.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
56. If he's not tough enough why is Hillary behind??
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sloppyjoe25s Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
57. Pure Joke Thread
just laugh and move along...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
58. This would be funny, but do you understand what would happen to the party is Obama conceded now
with his lead and all his momentum. People would assume the worst and the black vote would be lost to the democratic party probably forever. Are you too myopic to understand about blow-back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
60. Because, as noted, he's winning...
and it's an election, not a coronation. Last time I checked, this was still the Democratic Party, not the Royalist Party (despite what Clinton seems to think).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
61. Because Obama is the front runner
and the people's choice.

Hillary OTOH should immediately stop her divisive campaign and get behind the next president of the United States, President Obama!!!

GOBAMA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. He is the front runner this week.
He just became the front runner. Things change in politics really fast. It would be arrogant for anyone to say one candidate or another should drop out at this point. Why do Obama supporters think she is that far behind? It boggles my mind. They have been neck in neck for a while now. He is not the "people's choice" and neither is she. About half the Dems want her and about half the Dems want him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
63. good post--Shows the utter stupidity of Obamacampers and their 200 plus
threads on the same topic.

thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
64. Why doesn't the sun just take a day off
and not show up in the East?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
66. If he is so weak, then why drop out in favor of someone who hasn't beaten him?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
67. Concede, he's in the lead?
Hillary is going down, but don't fret or frown
Obama can take on any freep, and blow em right down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #67
71. It occurs to me
That as incredibly talented, powerful and gifted a campaigner as Hillary Clinton is, that when Obama finally beats her once and for all, no republican has a chance of taking him in the general election. Thanks Hillary and her supporters. you're making a juggernaut out of our future nominee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. I agree, the Hillary machine is mightier than the McCain one (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
68. Because he's winning?
Why doesn't Hillary concede? It's the same question.

Why would anyone concede in either of their positions at this point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fox Mulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
72. What a waste of a thread.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 03:16 PM by Fox Mulder
I thought the "Three threads in GDP rule" was meant for people to post more thoughtful threads, not crap like this.

FYI, Obama is winning. He has more delegates than HRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
73. Why should anyone listen to you?
You don't even live in the US:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
74. Your post makes sense...

if you replace Obama with Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC