Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama Voted Against Regular Citizens in Class Action Lawsuits - Clinton Voted For Us

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 03:43 PM
Original message
Barack Obama Voted Against Regular Citizens in Class Action Lawsuits - Clinton Voted For Us
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00009

In this vote, the Senate passed S. 5, a bill to move many interstate, class-action lawsuits (multiple claims from various lawsuits with parties in more than one state combined into one, larger lawsuit) from state to federal courts and to make other changes regarding this type of lawsuit. Procedure in federal courts is generally considered less friendly to consumers than in state courts. The bill, strongly favored by corporations that assert that a glut of lawsuits is threatening their survival, would grant federal jurisdiction over these suits where the total disputed amount is larger than $5 million. Supporters of the legislation claimed that the bill would prevent practices such as "forum shopping;" i.e., when lawyers file suits in the jurisdictions where plaintiffs tend to win large awards. In opposing the legislation, Progressives were joined by civil rights, consumer and other public interest groups in arguing that it would prevent seriously injured plaintiffs from obtaining justice, as the federal courts are already overburdened with case backlogs and because those courts might be less inclined to approve large monetary awards even where they are truly deserved. About half of all Democrats joined Republicans to pass the legislation by a vote of 72 to 26; thus defeating Progressives and approving legislation that would make it more difficult for whole classes of injured consumers to go to federal court to seek redress for their grievances.

http://www.progressivepunch.org/vote.jsp?member=ILIII&issue=M9&year=2005&num=9&district=At%20large

Discuss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Crickets...chirp, chirp, chirp!!!
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 04:51 PM by golddigger
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, I Noticed That
I guess there's simply no defending that vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MJJLWolf2 Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clinton voted against the war!
Oh no wait LOLZZZZZZZZ.

Oh btw there's no way she can win! And just to stick it to you even further, welp, she isn't capable of winning!

KThanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just a quick scan of that, I get the impression that's the same as bush's tort reform in Texas.
It helps the corporations and the insurance companies, has not helped the "little person" at all. Nor has it made any appreciable difference in insurance rates. The stockholders won, not the policyholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It is. This was Bush, the corporations, and the rethugs bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. His rhetoric doesn't match his record
The msm is hiding his record. If he is the nominee we will finally hear about it. We need to vet him ourselves as political consumers now before we go on a blind date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC