Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Halperin : John Edwards Thinks Barack Obama Is "Kind Of A Pussy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:51 PM
Original message
Mark Halperin : John Edwards Thinks Barack Obama Is "Kind Of A Pussy"
HALPERIN : I can tell you, he's really skeptical of her ability to be the kind of president he wants. But, he kinda thinks Obama is...he thinks Obama is kind of a pussy...He has real questions about Obama's toughness, his readiness for the office.

http://thephoenix.com/MediaLog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=7bc50b07-ec45-44c2-8816-edf18144313c


What is wrong with clowns like him and Shuster?... There is nothing worse than a bunch of white bread guys trying to sound hip or thug...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just to be clear, Edwards never said this
Halperin just made it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Halperin And Shuster Are Total Idiots
They are not a bunch of guys shooting the shit at a local watering hole and should not conduct themselves as such...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:57 PM
Original message
Halperin is not an idiot per se.
I understand that he is something of a FOB and a Hillshill.

This was intentional. And the number of times it has been posted here this afternoon
is suspect. This is at least the third thread on this sexist statement.

Where is the Hillary supporter's outrage now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
39. "FOB and a Hillshill" - You just made that up. Lie much? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. So does Joe Wilson
-snip-

But will Mr. Obama fight? His brief time on the national scene gives little comfort. Consider a February 2006 exchange of letters with Mr. McCain on the subject of ethics reform. The wrathful Mr. McCain accused Mr. Obama of being "disingenuous," to which Mr. Obama meekly replied, "The fact that you have now questioned my sincerity and my desire to put aside politics for the public interest is regrettable but does not in any way diminish my deep respect for you." Then one of McCain's aides said of Obama, "Obama wouldn't know the difference between an RPG and a bong."

Mr. McCain was insultingly dismissive but successful in intimidating his inexperienced colleague. Thus, in his one face-to-face encounter with Mr. McCain, Mr. Obama failed to stand his ground.

What gives us confidence Mr. Obama will be stronger the next time he faces Mr. McCain, a seasoned political fighter with extensive national security credentials? Even more important, what special disadvantages does Mr. Obama carry into this contest on questions of national security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. :-) (without using that word)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. yes; how halperin said it is the main problem, IMO. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
satireV Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. This is a very important point
It does appear Obama may be too weak to even respond to the reporter who called him a pussy.

These are the attacks that cannot be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cjmastaw Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, Obama is still in it.
And edwards said he was in it all the way... that kind of makes him the p@@@y.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. excellent point!
and I say that as a former Edwards supporter. Granted this is Halperin's characterization, but John should know that he may run the risk of becoming totally irrelevant to this process if he endorses the "establishment" candidate.

I spoke with quite a few people here in red state NC, and a good number of people said they were turned off by john's "fighting" references. I'm all for a good fight, but at some point we have to work together to get anything accomplished. I think Obama is that person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. Please leave Edwards out of this - attack Halperin, who is living up to
the ideals of the man, he wrote was our Edwards R Murrow, Matt Drudge. (Apologies to Murrow)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ironic, since even if true, this coming from someone who refused to
be an attack dog, the traditional role, as VP.

Agreed, that this type of language is inappropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. I find that ironic also n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, that sounds JUST like Edwards' vernacular
Sorry -- he isn't that vulgar. Thanks for playing though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. its clear in the post that JE did not say that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. oh, come on.
seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. IBTL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Do locked threads count against the 3?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I sure hope so nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Word-up!
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 04:55 PM by IanDB1
"What is wrong with clowns like him and Shuster?... There is nothing worse than a bunch of white bread guys trying to sound hip or thug..."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just like the toughness Edward showed us in 2004?
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 04:58 PM by Lost-in-FL
The nerve...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
Just like the toughness Edward showed us in 2004?
Posted by Lost-in-FL


The nerve...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. I could read your post tho...
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #37
50. add partial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Edwards did NOT say this .Halprin did.
And I agree with Edwards about Obamas "lack of toughness" or "readiness for office".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Oh, really? Please enlighten me as to Edwards's readiness for office?
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 05:06 PM by beachmom
Obama has more legislative experience -- 8 years in the state legislature and 3 in the U.S. Senate, known as a quick study on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in addition to his stellar work on ethics reform, immigration reform, and nuclear non-proliferation. Edwards had one term as senator (2 years of which he was absent), and then a perpetual presidential campaign, lasting 6 years. How one runs their campaign certainly can count as experience, but I am wondering how being a trial lawyer counts as more experience compared to being a community organizer, President of the Harvard Law Review, civil rights lawyer, lecturer at a top law school, and a state senator for 8 years.

Look, I have no quarrel with Edwards. He can endorse whom he wants, or not endorse anyone. I will not begrudge him his right to do that. But the idea that Obama is less ready for the WH than Edwards is quite laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. I agree, also Richard Clarke thought Obama "got it" on national security
Last August, A very close friend of mine met Clarke at a wedding and commented on the excellent national security speech Obama gave a bit earlier that people said Clarke had worked with him on. Clarke spoke of how he was a quick study, asked the right questions and got it. On the SFRC, his questions are ususally very good followup questions on threads started by Kerry, Feingold, and Boxer. This is impressive as it is easier to read a prepared statement and prepared questions. (Something that HRC appears to often do on the armed services committee. ) That Senators Kerry and Kennedy are impressed with his ideas on foreign policy means a great deal to me.

I would guess that Clark and Lugar have had more contact with Obama, than Wilson, who was an ambassador when Clinton was in office (I think he was also one during the Bush 1 years.) Pay Back?

This was not an area of strength for Edwards, but in 2004, Kerry did not need someone with foreign policy expertize as he himself was strong in that area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. I vote we send all Male pundits to charm school! Who's with me?
Prepare the bars of soap!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Um edwards is the one who quit
Maybe he's a pussy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Halperin on Edwards: "A pussy beat me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Don't know about the vernacular, but the sentiment is spot on.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Then you concur with reporters making gross sexist statements.
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 05:27 PM by Big Blue Marble
Did you defend Shuster last week?

Did you call that vernacular. Gee, I must have missed your arguments in his defense.

And will you be you be agreeing with this sentiment in the fall here on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Shuster And Halperin =Idiots
I'm consistent...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. Sissy? Momma's boy? Wuss? Wimp? Pantywaist? Cry baby? Chicken-livered? Jellyfish?
pussy:
Slang, A man regarded as weak, timid, or unmanly.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pussy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Pussy is a gross sexist word that demeans women.
So are many of your other examples by the way.

Did you defend Shuster last week. Many here said that was just slang too.
I said it was gross. Did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Complain: letters@time.com I did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. For being "kind of a pussy"
He is holding up rather well in this process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. A "pussy" who was able to pass Ethics reform in the US senate in his first few years.....
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 05:06 PM by FrenchieCat
To me, it is Barack who kicks ass...and it ain't based on how "mad" he can appear to get either!

Here's some detail on this pussy!
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/271/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. He had to stand against some of the most powerful Senators in the Democratic party to do that
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 05:38 PM by karynnj
Reid did not want real ethics reform - just as the Democrats took over and Schumer wanted the lobbyists' help in campaign fund raising. Obama outmaneuvered them on the latter and was with a small group of Democrats who wanted real reform (no HRC no included).

On lobbying: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/20/us/politics/20ethics.html?_r=2&scp=3&sq=Senate+ethics+bill&st=nyt&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
"Given the reliance of many lawmakers on lobbyists as fund-raisers, the idea of requiring them to disclose their roles usually meets stiff resistance on Capitol Hill — all of it behind the scenes and almost none of it in public. House passage is far from assured, and its adoption by the Senate by a roll-call vote of 96 to 2 followed some backroom resistance among senators in both parties to allowing the idea to come up for a vote at all.

The Republicans who controlled the Senate last year refused to let it come up. And on Jan. 12, before the details of the proposal had been disclosed, Senator Charles E. Schumer, the New York Democrat in charge of his party’s fund-raising as head of the senatorial campaign committee, used a run-in on the Senate floor to deliver an angry rebuke to the disclosure idea’s lead sponsor, Senator Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois, several people present or briefed on the confrontation said.

In a subsequent conversation, Mr. Schumer said he worried that the proposal could cramp fund-raising by placing an undue burden on potential bundlers, said aides who were briefed and a lawmaker familiar with their talk, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the nature of the talks.

“Senator Obama has not been the most popular person in our caucus in the last couple of weeks,” said a Democratic aide involved in deliberations over the bill. Mr. Obama also this week started a bid for his party’s presidential nomination.

(Aside - this took strength of character to do - especially when he had Presidential aspirations.)

On real reform: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/7/101110/2068
This is an excellent diary explaining some behind the scenes actions early 2007 when the ethics bill was worked on.

Can you give me a single example of when Edwards led on anything in the Senate that was tough and not wanted by powerful people in the Senate?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Here's another example where he worked for a needed change
that would be more likely to lose than win him votes. It is also illustrative of how you can work with all the stakeholders - even those likely to want to fight it tooth and nail and stick to your principles and get something important done.

This explains how he got legislation passed that makes Illinois police tape interrogations. It is a very important piece of civil rights legislation. The victims of coerced confessions are not upper middle class people powerful in their communities.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/03/AR2008010303303.html

This took intelligence, determination and patience to achieve - and it really benefits those without a voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. But if he really did say this, wouldn't it be
blasphemy? Wouldn't he go to hell or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Honestly, I'd lose some respect for him. I'd expect this sexist machismo from GWB,
not JE.

But I don't think he ever said or would say it. Flame away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. Edwards never said it.
He may have expressed sentiments of doubt about Obama, but he never called Obama a "Pussy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. What has Edwards ever been tough about? Talk tough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. He is the guy who said that Matt Drudge was our Edwards R Murrow
I seriously doubt Edwards was close enough to him that he would speak of such things - I also doubt that that is the way Edwards thinks or speaks.

If you read his book on 2004, you would see that he places very little value on the truth of items reported - just whether they worked. He even had about 4 pages praising Drudge and the Republicans for a story that took a routine $75 Kerry hair cut and turned it into a hit piece speaking of a $1000 hair styling and coloring, complete with completely made up quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Halperin is paraphrasing in very crude terms. But in the other
article Edwards was to have said that Obama was not "tough enough" for the election. See my thoughts on that upthread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
48. I was giving Edwards the benefit of the doubt because I hadn't seen that
Obama has shown for strength and determination than I have ever seen from Edwards. Edwards may have been the weakest VP nominee in terms of fighting back that I have seen in my lifetime - only Leiberman gives him a run for his money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
38. insulting O and women at the same time; don't know what the strategy there is; trying to be a bad-bo
bad-boy i guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
44. "Obama is skinny but he's tough" (quote)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
47. Oh, don't start this again
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 05:49 PM by OzarkDem
I posted a version of this, then edited it. Have been busy all afternoon but came back and saw it caused a stir. Pls. let this one drop. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
49. he appologized already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
51. Maybe this is why Obama keeps telling everyone that he's skinny but he's tough.
He must have found out that Edwards thinks he's a pussy, so he's gotta push the "I'm skinny but I'm tough" rhetoric out there. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
52. Well, Hillary is kind of a... err, or has kind of a...
...oh, damn. I'm just digging myself in deeper. :evilgrin:

(I voted for Hillary in NH, so don't give me grief!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC