Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Hillary letting Obama win a few states here and there?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:31 PM
Original message
Poll question: Why is Hillary letting Obama win a few states here and there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because, as they admitted today, they made a huge campaign blunder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'll go with choices 1, 2, and 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. The same reason Giuliani let other Repubs win a few states here and there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Because contrary to the Clinton meme...
She is not an experienced campaigner at all. She has only run for office twice and only faced marginally serious opposition once. Then she used her enormous name recognition and fondness for her husband to win a Senate seat in a highly Democratic state against a less than formidable Republican. In her reelection campaign she faced no serious challengers.

Obama didn't face serious opposition in his Senate race, true, but he ran for and lost a HR race, faced serious Primary challenges when he won his State Senate race, and was the underdog in the Primary race for his US Senate seat. So as far as campaigning, Obama is actually more experienced and vetted.

Being close to a candidate and a campaign is irrelevant. I mean Rove obviously knows how to win, but he would have a hard time getting himself elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because with her vaunted '35 years of experience', the truth is she ran an inferior campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks! I love The Onion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. This fella has your answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Is that you, mtnsnake?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. No. You have to get something that looks more like a combination of Richard Gere & George Clooney
That dude there doesn't come close :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Well, maybe so, but the rhetoric's the same.....
after all, Clooney endorsed Obama. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. %!X*#!%x@#!
Arggh! I forgot about that :mad:

Richard Gere and Brad Pitt? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I can has delegatez?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because Hillary plans to contest the rules and claim the goal was to win fewer states:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hahahahahahahahahahaha!
Obama - 21 states + DC, US Virgin Islands

Clinton; 12 states

that's not 'letting him win a few here and there'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because she could care less about you
Unless you fit into her strategery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaronbees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. You have a future in satire
That gave me a nice laugh. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. All in fun
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm Torn...
If this isn't the dumbest thread of the day - it's in the top 2.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. She's a masochist who loves pain.
That's why she's still with Bill. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Honestly I think it's all about money.
We all know how elections can be manipulated. As long as we have a tight race they'll be able to whip supporters into a frenzy. ...This race has become about black against white, man against woman, young against old. ...The other day on FOX, :puke:, Karl Rove spoke about sending your favorite candidate money, because that's the only way they could win.

What gets me really sick is that there are still state primaries to come, yet they already know that super delegates will be needed. ...What kind of BS is this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC