mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:31 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Why is Hillary letting Obama win a few states here and there? |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Because, as they admitted today, they made a huge campaign blunder. |
AX10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'll go with choices 1, 2, and 4. |
skipos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The same reason Giuliani let other Repubs win a few states here and there. nt |
NMMatt
(523 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
14. Because contrary to the Clinton meme... |
|
She is not an experienced campaigner at all. She has only run for office twice and only faced marginally serious opposition once. Then she used her enormous name recognition and fondness for her husband to win a Senate seat in a highly Democratic state against a less than formidable Republican. In her reelection campaign she faced no serious challengers.
Obama didn't face serious opposition in his Senate race, true, but he ran for and lost a HR race, faced serious Primary challenges when he won his State Senate race, and was the underdog in the Primary race for his US Senate seat. So as far as campaigning, Obama is actually more experienced and vetted.
Being close to a candidate and a campaign is irrelevant. I mean Rove obviously knows how to win, but he would have a hard time getting himself elected.
|
Diane R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Because with her vaunted '35 years of experience', the truth is she ran an inferior campaign. |
Starbucks Anarchist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Thanks! I love The Onion! |
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
6. This fella has your answer. |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Is that you, mtnsnake? |
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. No. You have to get something that looks more like a combination of Richard Gere & George Clooney |
|
That dude there doesn't come close :smoke:
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Well, maybe so, but the rhetoric's the same..... |
|
after all, Clooney endorsed Obama. :rofl:
|
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
Arggh! I forgot about that :mad:
Richard Gere and Brad Pitt? :shrug:
|
maddiejoan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
anigbrowl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Because Hillary plans to contest the rules and claim the goal was to win fewer states: |
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Hahahahahahahahahahaha! |
|
Obama - 21 states + DC, US Virgin Islands
Clinton; 12 states
that's not 'letting him win a few here and there'.
|
thevoiceofreason
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Because she could care less about you |
|
Unless you fit into her strategery.
|
aaronbees
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message |
12. You have a future in satire |
|
That gave me a nice laugh. :D
|
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If this isn't the dumbest thread of the day - it's in the top 2.
:eyes:
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message |
17. She's a masochist who loves pain. |
|
That's why she's still with Bill. :popcorn:
|
Just-plain-Kathy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-13-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Honestly I think it's all about money. |
|
We all know how elections can be manipulated. As long as we have a tight race they'll be able to whip supporters into a frenzy. ...This race has become about black against white, man against woman, young against old. ...The other day on FOX, :puke:, Karl Rove spoke about sending your favorite candidate money, because that's the only way they could win.
What gets me really sick is that there are still state primaries to come, yet they already know that super delegates will be needed. ...What kind of BS is this?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:16 AM
Response to Original message |