Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Ventura: "It's in the interest of the media to pretend that John McCain has a chance..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:35 AM
Original message
Michael Ventura: "It's in the interest of the media to pretend that John McCain has a chance..."
from the latest "Letters at 3 a.m. Column:

Least Reported and Most Important Numbers:

It's in the interest of the media to pretend that John McCain has a chance in a national election against Barack Obama and/or Hillary Clinton – and a surprising number of smart people buy that storyline. It's dramatic, after all. Pundits cite this poll and that, though polls got both New Hampshire and Super Tuesday severely wrong. Look not at the polls but at the numbers. On Super Tuesday Clinton received a total of 7,427,700 votes; Obama, a total of 7,369,798 (The New York Times, Feb. 7, p.1). Strangely, neither The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, Politico.com, CNN, nor MSNBC reported similar Republican totals. However, USA Today (Feb. 7, p.10) gave those totals state-by-state; I counted them up, rounding to the highest thousand. John McCain, Mitt Romney, and Mike Huckabee together won the votes of roughly 8,393,000 – compared to roughly 14,798,000 for Clinton and Obama. McCain alone got merely 3,628,000 – less than half the total of either Clinton or Obama.

These voting patterns have been consistent everywhere but in Florida, where Democrats did not campaign, and, in all primaries but Florida, Democrats have turned out in higher numbers than Republicans by a rate of 2-1 (The Week, Feb. 8, p.16). In the Iowa primary, "three times as many Iowans shifted their registration to the Democratic Party as shifted to the Republicans" (The New York Times, Jan. 29, p.1). "In the last 45 days of primary registration, 150,633 Californians registered as Democrats, while 39,246 registered as Republicans" (The New York Times, Feb. 4, p.20). In Kansas, supposedly "the reddest state," Republican turnout was just half that of the Democrats' (CNN, Feb. 9). What the numbers say is that if Clinton runs and Obama is not on the ticket, she'll thrash McCain even if many African-Americans desert her. If Obama runs, and Clinton is not on the ticket, he'll thrash McCain even without a large Hispanic turnout.

If the ticket is Obama-Clinton or Clinton-Obama, they'll grind John McCain into electoral dust. That is why Republicans are having big trouble raising money; their own people don't believe they can win – while, as was widely reported on CNN and MSNBC, Obama and Clinton between them, in just the two days after Super Tuesday, raised roughly $20 million. The real election is being decided in the primaries. Unless disaster intervenes, the next president will be Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. All that folderol about "Hillary can't beat McCain because she's Hillary," or "Obama can't win because he's black" denies the only concrete data we have: money raised and votes cast.

<snip>

More at the link -- including quite a bit about Obama's "Exelon" fiasco, where he kept re-shaping a bill to please the nuclear industry:

http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/column?oid=oid%3A591599

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. "It's in the interest of the media to pretend that John McCain has a chance..."
...Aint that the truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, GE (MS-GOP and the NBC family) is selling him hard, like side-by-side
refrigerators on sale!

They gotta keep their Top Ten Pentagon Contractor status up and running!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. GE wants to avoid being reduced to competing in an open market...
...at all costs! Fat government welfare checks are much better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC