Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's the big deal about Obama opposing the war from beginning?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:37 AM
Original message
What's the big deal about Obama opposing the war from beginning?
Honestly, how difficult was it for him to be brave in BLUE STATE Illinois? It's not like he had anything to lose by being against the war. The fact that he still continues to fund it and no-showed a vote calling Iran a terrorist nation doesn't inspire me with much confidence that, had he been in the senate at the time, he would have voted against it.

So he was right about the war from the start. Big damn deal. So were thousands of others including myself. I don't think I'm qualified to be president either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary knew that we were right but was too cowardly...
and too opportunistic to oppose Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Look at his district, though. As Joe Wilson noted it was the most liberal in the state
It took real courage to stand up to his liberal constituents! When he got to the senate he showed this courage by making 0 speeches on Iraq until the middle of 2006 when he rose to opposed a withdrawal bill. Barack Obama: agent of change!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. And you can bet that if Bush had succeeded....
No one have ever remembered his speech at all. It wasn't exactly risky to go speak to a few hundred people and a left anti-war rally. A "profile in courage" it was not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. Yup and the speech is the only reason he is where he is today
Without it he would be another also ran who tried to make it to senator or governor and failed. He would still be voting "present" in Illinois if he didn't have the "courage" to appeal to his very Democratic district and set himself up for the senate primary if he decided to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. You got that right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. He didn't have a district...he was running for U.S. Senate.....
which takes all Illinois votes.

In addition,


OBAMA FIRST ADDRESSED THE IRAQ WAR IN COMMITTEE IN JANUARY 2005 AND ON THE FLOOR IN APRIL 2005, FOUR MONTHS AFTER ENTERING THE US SENATE

1/19/05: Obama Criticized Condoleezza Rice For Not Offering A Timetable, Reiterated That Job Of Senator Is To Confirm That Administration Is Making Decisions Based On Facts. During Condoleezza Rice's confirmation hearing, Obama criticized her for not offering a timetable. Obama said, "And I recognize that you are hesitant in your current position to provide a timetable. On the other hand, constituents and families in small towns all across Illinois need some more satisfactory answer than that. And it strikes me that this whole issue of training troops, turning over security functions to the Iraqi government is critical to that...I guess the comment that I'd like to make is that in the activist proactive strategies that you pursue, it seems to me that this administration often asks that we simply go along and have faith that you're making the right decisions. But I think that from the perspective of my constituents in Illinois, at least, a number of people did vote for George Bush and do trust him. But my job as a senator is to make sure that we're basing these decisions on facts and that I probe and not simply take it on faith that good decisions are being made.

4/14/05:Obama First Addressed The War On The Floor Of The Senate. Obama said on the floor,
"The other day I had the opportunity to visit some of our wounded heroes at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. I know that many of my colleagues have made the same trip and I'd heard about their visits, but there is nothing that can fully prepare you for what you see when you take that first step into the Physical Therapy room. These are kids in there. Our kids. The ones we watched grow up. The ones we hoped would live lives that were happy, healthy, and safe. These kids left their homes and families for a dangerous place halfway around the world. After years of being protected by their parents, these kids risked their lives to protect us. And now, some of them have come home from that war with scars that may change their lives forever -- scars that may never heal. And yet they sit there in that hospital, so full of hope and still so proud of their country. These kids are the best of America. They deserve our highest respect, and they deserve our help."


2005: Obama Spoke Out Against the War Repeatedly. During 2005, Obama continued to criticize the war, saying that security was "horrible", that the war never should have been waged, and that the US should get out of Iraq as "soon as we can."


2006: Obama Spoke Out Against the War Repeatedly. During 2006, Obama continued to criticize the war, saying that we should start phasing down troops soon and calling for an "expeditious yet responsible" exit from Iraq.
RHETORIC: "Yet, like most democrats, Obama voted to keep funding the war until last year."


REALITY: EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT HAS VOTED TO FUND THE WAR IN IRAQ
2005-2007: Since Obama Came To Washington, Every Single Senate Democrat Has Voted For Every Bill Funding Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan Until President Bush Vetoed A Timetable For Withdrawal – Including Both Emergency Supplemental Bills And Defense Appropriations Bills. Since Obama came to Washington in January of 2005, every single Senate Democrat has voted for every bill funding operations in Iraq and Afghanistan until President Bush vetoed a timetable for withdrawal – including both emergency supplemental bills and defense appropriations bills that included bridge funding with the expressed purpose of continuing operations in Iraq as well as Afghanistan.

http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck2/2008/01/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. He was running two years before the election?
So was he running for president from 2005?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #26
36. Yep what? You think he was running for senate when...
the AUMF was voted on? Bzzt. Wrong. He got his ass handed to him in 2000 in a senate primary. He ran again in 2004. The AUMF was in 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. He was running for the Senate.....
In mid-2002, Obama began to focus on the upcoming US Senate race. The incumbent, Republican Peter Fitzgerald, seemed beatable, and it was not clear Carol Moseley Braun, who had held the seat before Fitzgerald, would try to reclaim it. Obama and his wife made a deal: This would be, as his wife puts it now, "the last hurrah."

At a few key appearances around Illinois that year, advisers say, Obama felt the magic again.

On a Saturday night in September 2002, the Pierre Menard Democrat Club held its annual membership dinner at a VFW hall in Sparta, where a few hundred party faithful paid $100 to eat roast beef and ham. Obama was a last-minute fill-in keynote speaker. He made the 650-mile round trip in one day, needing to be back for a church event Sunday morning.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/10/12/early_defeat_launched_a_rapid_political_climb/?page=7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #40
51. He's running for 2004 race in 2002....
and that's not a guy that has spent his life calculating and calibrating? And they called Bill Clinton slick Willy. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. The AUMF was in 2002
Try again. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. The AUMF was in 2002
Try again. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Oh, and that was quite a difficult run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. More difficult than Hillary against Lazo in New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. Yeah, beating Alan Keyes in IL must have been really rough
The world's biggest wonder boy with no real accomplishments. But hey, 3 yrs in the senate and he DID manage to get a post office named something or other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. That and some speeches written by some hipsters delivered baritone
are all you need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. I stand corrected
Now why did he oppose full withdrawal until he began running for president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
57. Compared to Hillary's courage in..
standing up to her constituents and voting for the war?

You know, the courage she hoped would get her into the White House, thousands of human lives be damned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. So what it is considered when you vote for the war in EVEN BIGGER BLUE STATE NY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. Joe Wilson set the record straight today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. He didn't do shit but secured his position as Sec of State in her
kitchen cabinet in New York....where she will remain a Senator. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Hans Blix was lying for Hillary in 2002 too?
Blix knew that without the AUMF there would be no inspections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Then maybe she should have voted for the Levin Amendment! hey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. Maybe she voted against it for the same reason Feingold voted against it?
Hey! Feingold voted against it for the same reason she says she did.

"Mr. FEINGOLD. Mr. President, I rise to briefly comment on Senator Levin's alternative proposal relating to Iraq. Some of my colleagues for whom I have tremendous respect have tried to address the fact that the administration's proposal is simply not good enough by emphasizing the desirability of a United Nations resolution, thus transforming this dangerous unilateral proposal into an internationally sanctioned multilateral mission. But while I recognize that international support is a crucial ingredient in any recipe for addressing the weapons of mass destruction threat in Iraq without undercutting the fight against terrorism, I will not and cannot support any effort to give the United Nations Security Council Congress's proxy in deciding whether or not to send American men and women into combat in Iraq. No Security Council vote can answer my questions about plans for securing WMD or American responsibilities in the wake of an invasion of Iraq. It is for this reason that I must oppose the proposal of the distinguished Senator from Michigan."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. Link.......
And he voted against the IWR. Got that speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #33
43. Kitchen cabinet? Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #33
48. What makes your think he wants a job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
42. BECAUSE BLUE STATE NY got hit by planes hijacked by terrorists.
Proximity matters. Did Obama ever visit Ground Zero? If he did, how long did it take him to go there? What did Obama do for the people of New York who were psychologically devastated by the attacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. I'm Sorry, I was under the assumption that Iraq had NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11
What was I thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #42
58. New Yorkers were opposed to the IWR.
but Hillary had to consider other factors besides the will of her constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #42
66. You still don't get it.
After all these years and you are still buying the bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. New York Senator should have also known better......
since they knew as well as anyone that 9/11 and Iraq were not related. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. 80% of her constituents supported the war
Or did you forget that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. 100%...
of this guys constituents supported it...

http://tnjn.com/2007/mar/26/rep-duncan-rails-against-iraq-/

It's all about judgment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. You're kidding yourself if you think Obama would have voted no
There is no way he would have risked his beloved presidential aspirations on that. Not a chance in hell. That's why he voted against troop withdrawals his first year in the senate, before the rest of the country turned on the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
59. No they did not.
You are revising history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
85. Provide proof for that assertion or stop saying it.
I don't believe you. I know a million New Yorkers marched AGAINST the war in 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
88. Not true. Proof please. I'll wait. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's not going to mean a hill of beans come Nov
But he's put all his eggs in that basket. I don't think it's going to win TX, OH, and PA over, that's for sure. And there are 492 delegates up for grabs there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Especially if Hillary is the nominee.....since she walked in lock steps with McCain.....
another election where going into Iraq is not an issue makes me want to puke! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
30. If security is not an issue we win Hillary neutralizes McCain on security and beats her domestically
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary had the safest state, still caved, still sold out. That's the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. 80% of her constituents supported the war
Was she supposed to represent them or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
45. what?
this is a reason to vote for the Authorization? Because 80% favor it?

80% didn't have the facts, and believed what they saw on the TV. She had access to the facts, and refused to read the NIE, and believed the dog and pony show that Bush threw at Congress.

How did the 2 reporters for Knight Ridder, featured in PBS' "Buying the War" keep on reporting that all the facts about WMD's were bogus, yet this Senator with 35 years of experience, with 10x more information at her fingertips than any reporter could possibly have, believe everything W said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #45
55. So you buy into the Bush bullshit
... that the congress had the same info he did? That's just a bald faced lie on his part, as has been well documented. The biggest problem with Obama supporters is that repeat rethug talking points over and over and over, as if they were true. And Obama does it too. It's a big reason he should not be our party's nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
60. Hillary's constituents opposed the IWR.
They wanted more time for inspections, a broad coalition and proof that Saddam had WMDs. Hillary voted for Bush's rush to war, against the wishes of the people who had elected her.

I don't know what makes you think you can rewrite historical fact. A lot of us were actually involved back then, in contact with Hillary's office on a regular basis.

Why do Clinton supporters keep making this foolish argument? You can't win. Your candidate was wrong for all of the wrong reasons. She betrayed her constituents, she betrayed our party, and she betrayed this country, all for personal political gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
89. Nonsense. You can post it a million time more and it still won't
be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Point Is - Hillary Was WRONG!!!
And too ashamed too admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Actually the point is Bush lied
To you, to me, to the press, and to every congressional rep in the country. Big time. Did you vote for Kerry in 2004? Of course you did. He was wrong too. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. And He Had The Courage To Admit His Vote Was Wrong!!!
So did John Edwards, and nearly everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Not before you voted for him in 2004 he didn't
I was here you know. Nice try, but incorrect. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
78. Really that is the only point. If she had just said I should not
have trusted Bush, this whole issue would have been dead. It wasn't a major problem for Edwards. The problem is not that she was for it, but that it is perceived that her decision was that of calculation to be president and protect her flank, and that she cannot make a coherent response without a 30 minute discussion of the "context" of the vote.

I give her a pass on the war. I will not vote for her because she cannot make a simple declarative statement that it was wrong, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. He also called out the Wolfowitz/Perle ideology
and that they were pushing it down our throats. He didn't just oppose the war, he called all the details of its inception correctly. Hillary not only believed every ounce of intelligence Bush touted, she repeated it to add to the fearmongering, and maintains the validity of it to this day. She's been wrong all the way around. She didn't just vote for the IWR, she supported it while only criticizing its execution. She didn't take a withdrawal stand until it came time to campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Actually neither did he
He voted against withdrawing troops as a senator until it was time to campaign. Brave of him, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
31. The big deal is we are Democrats, and Hillary votes Republican on key issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #31
52. Like raising SS taxes that won't be used on SS
Oh wait, no. That's Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
37. If You Can't Get An Issue Like An Illegal War Right,
why in the hell would anyone vote for you? I have yet to hear a good reason to support Hillary after her votes to allow Bush the right to ruin our country, illegally invade anther country and kill thousands of our soldiers and innocent Iraqis. Exactly how do I forgive that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Cause she's ready to vote for more war, this time with Iran,
from day one? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
46. It shows Obama is not a Flip Flopper, the favorite GOP smear tactic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. O.=1. O.said NO, 2, then said he did not know,3, then funded, 4, decided to run for pres and said NO


whishy washy flippy floppin for political convenience! thats Obama for yah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. Now that is SOME flip flopping
Hell, that a flip, flop, flip, flop, flip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
50. Judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #50
56. Obama's judgement of his pal Rezko was put on hold until after the goods were delivered.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #56
71. Hillary's judgement of her adultering Big Dog was put on hold until after the goods were delivered.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. You're welcome to re-run what ever Clinton flaw comes in to your head...
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 02:58 PM by oasis
but you did get my point.;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #75
81. How about the War in Iraq?
Obama may want to work with the Republicans for a better future, but Hillary capitulates at the sound of their words. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #81
90. Hillary won't need to "capitulate" because she'll be running the show. Get it?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
53. Sizzle.
You burned their asses. Great post, especially this part:

Big damn deal. So were thousands of others including myself. I don't think I'm qualified to be president either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
61. You don't have to be so brave when your opponent is Alan Keyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boricua79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
62. it was very difficult
you could and DID get tar and feathered for not being patriotic.

I had problems at my place of work for being an anti-war activist in 2004. People used to ignore me in the hallways, etc.

It was hard to be someone who put human rights and international law FIRST, before "patriotism".

And it must have been harder for a non-white, liberal Democratic Senator with aspirations to be President.

Easy was going with the Republicans when the wind was going their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
63. It seems GDP has taken a very NEGATIVE turn, even for here in the last day or so. New FUD strategy.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 06:52 AM by Bongo Prophet
New faces and new talking points.
"So Obama was right. BIG DEAL."

Where are any positive threads about Hillary?
Just when the cable pundits are saying she has to go negative, this board changes too.
Coincidence? Nope.

Should this make me, as a voter in Texas, feel really positive about voting FOR something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #63
68. At least the seem to have been told to drop the cult bullshit.
The new talking points appear to be:

1) Obama is B L A C K
2) A vote for the IWR was a vote against the Iraq War.
3) Obama is not a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
64. Let's just say Obama people are easily pleased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
65. Nuttin' ...just great judgement.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 07:25 AM by GalleryGod
TEX-as!


Yeah, like ANY thought uttered aloud against Hill/McCain's War was welcome in Fall,2002... City Council Candidates in Big Cities HAD to discuss the coming clouds of war.
Were you asleep??? Apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #65
77. No one gave a damn about Barack Obama in 2002 or knew who he was
This certainly doesn't excuse Hillary voting for the war but I imagine it was harder for her, one of the GOP's most despised individuals, to oppose the war than some obscure state senator who wasn't on people's radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #77
83. So it was hard, so what?
That's when you stand up and be counted. Or you don't. And if you don't, you have no business expecting to be rewarded for your failure. We're talking full out national disaster here, not renaming a post office, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
67. It's rare these days to stand up for truth when it's unpopular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
69. Hillay is DLC, they supported it from the start, still support it
and her trying to say B*sh and Condi tricked her by saying it was only to apply pressure is disingenuous because the organization she is associated with were all for it from the beginning. That and they are for more wars as well. She will be too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
70. Your arguement only makes Hillary look worse
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 08:40 AM by nomad1776
You are saying she was a coward or she failed to see what "thousands of others including myself" knew, invading Iraq was a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
72. Great point. This one issue doesn't hold up especially since Obama vacilated in 02.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
73. BLUE STATE Illinois? as opposed to what RED STATE New York?!?! keep spinning.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
74. Obama: "I got it right"
"On the single most important foreign policy issue of our time, I got it right," Obama said.

He got it right, but he wasn't there? LOL!! Credit the man with a slick presentation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
76. He had nothing to gain by being against the war.
He spoke out against it anyway, even though he represented a city that was considered a potential terror target. I live in NYC, and I didn't hear many state or local representatives speaking out against the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
79. Dumb
ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. Thanks for that substantial and well-written response
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
82. Perhaps you should address your question to them:


No big deal.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moh96 Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
84. it matters because it means you are not going with the popular vote just to help yourself
you are standing for what you believe in at the time it easily could have been a career suicide

Thats says a lot about his character

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moh96 Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. remember freedom fries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
87. Hel-loo! New York is just as blue as Illinois. Duh.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #87
92. I like it how everyone in this thread assumes I support Hillary Clinton
I think Hillary was wrong for supporting the war but I'm not buying this bullshit of Obama being an "anti-war" candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
91. At the time nearly 80% of America was for the war and those against it were being called traitors
and far worse. You must have a short memory or have been living under a rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #91
93. But not in Illinois.
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 04:22 PM by BlueStater
And I don't think most people gave a damn about what some obscure state senator thought. I would have a lot more respect for Obama had he been a senator at the time and taken this stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
94. So, how did he and Hillary vote on the funding of the slaughter?
Neither will get my vote in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC