Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why people love/hate Hillary - because she reminds you of you.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:45 AM
Original message
Why people love/hate Hillary - because she reminds you of you.
A very important piece written by Erica Jong was posted on DU recently (link below). How can it be captured so beautifully? Hillary is everything we want to love or hate because she has a history and a past by which we can judge her. She has earned my trust and support because she has made choices, difficult choices, throughout her career and whether they were personal or career choices she made them, stuck by them and honored them. I admire her determination, credibility and integrity.

I personally believe she made the right choices. The IWR resolution that Hillary voted for was based upon information, incorrect information as we now know, that was not available to many including Barack Obama. And even Barack in 2002 (?) admits that he didn't have all the information and was not sure how he would vote. This vote as well as the Kyl-Lieberman vote gave authority to our president who made a grave error.

Barack appeals to those that want a clean slate, no baggage - dare I say "a fairytale". That's what he presents, a clean slate a mirror which his supporters can look into and see a perfect world with no history or policies by which to measure him.

I will choose experience and integrity over hopes and dreams every time.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4585961&mesg_id=4585961
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, I believed from the onset that the IWR would give Bush a green light to invade.
Also HRC voted "Aye" on the Kyle-Lieberman Amendment. We're not over BushED yet. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I completely agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Hans Blix credits it with giving the UN the oomph to get weapons inspectors back in Iraq...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. But he's wrong. The negotiations were in progress to let them back in
and virtually every point had been hammered out a month BEFORE IWR was voted on. Don't forget, even then American and British forces were bombing Saddam's air defenses on a nearly DAILY basis, enforcing the illegal no-fly zone. Saddam was only worried about losing control of the Shi'ites, as he had already lost control of the Kurds, and was trying to maintain a semblance of strength to keep the country from exploding.

And even Blix admits that in the years when the inspectors were on the ground, they found NOTHING. After they went back in they found NOTHING - nothing more than a few short-range missiles that might have been capable of striking a hundred miles beyond the allowed range, and they were promptly destroyed.

Saddam was not opposed to the inspectors because of fear they'd find something. He was opposed because he KNEW they would NOT find anything - and there goes his hold on power.

Anybody could see that, if they looked at it honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #44
70. Talk's cheap. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. As did MILLIONS of others across the country and around the world.
The 'secret knowledge' argument has been bogus from the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
76. gee what a coincidence, so did I!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm for Hillary and I just donated to her again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. In a way, it's not fair that everybody is against Clinton while everybody's in favor of Obama
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 08:49 AM by Bucky
Is that really any criterion for winning an election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
67. Im not against her, I think a Lot less people are against her than she'd like you to believe
really. most people I talk to like both Hillary and Obama and they've felt torn between choosing, in general, that's the widespread feeling among democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #67
71. I think you missed my irony
In a democracy, if everyone is against you, you're supposed to lose. That's kind of the point.

FWIW, not "everyone" is against Clinton. But if she keeps on losing primaries, it's hard to see the argument that she deserves to win. If she can't sell the case to a majority of Democrats, how's she gonna sell her case to the majority of Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. oh, oops, lol, sorry! I get it now, yes, I totally agree! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rock_Garden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Me, too, elixir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. I am one of the few young people...
who does not buy into Obama's hype.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. I'm curious. Would you mind filling me in on why the younger generation are
so enthralled? I'm not against the guy, I'm just surprised that there's been such an incredible surge towards him. My theory is that some people who have not been through a lot of experiences in life - debt, paying monthly bills, losing/gaining jobs.. you know, the stuff that really takes a lot out of you ...feel that Obama is the best. I think those people, generally, are the young, fresh-out-of college generation and the older, affluent generation who never had to struggle against those odds.

Let me know what your take is.

Thanks for the message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #43
68. Thats not fair, there are a lot of young people that have had to work really hard for what they have
In my experience, young affluent kids with few negative life experiences generally vote Republican!

The young democrats are those that care about social issues, fixing poverty, healthcare reform, reforming the political system, electing officials that can get stuff done and work for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #43
87. He makes them feel good buy appealing to the optimism of...
youth. Many young have not been touched directly by much and continuous hardship.
The realists understand and respect those offer concrete plans and offer experience of dealing with difficulties. Clinton has both. Young people don't value experience but think that they can change the world on their own. Give it 20 years and they will see the world very differently. They will be older and wiser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. No, I hate Hillary because Sean, Bill, and Rush told me to.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Jong piece is an earnest endorsement of HClinton's candidacy but
the premise about Hillary Clinton reminding us of ourselves doesn't fly, IMO.

It's too early to say that the Clinton campaign is mortally wounded, but they are in a difficult place.

"Fairy tale" and "myth" are nouns used in the United States as perjoratives. IMO they are not 'negative.' The Clinton campaign has been tactical but is low on mythic energy, and Obama's campaign has been both tactically sure-footed and mythically imbued. Note that the polling favors the combination and not the imbalance.

From press reports, somewhere around 20,000 people stood in very cold temps in Madison on Tuesday evening to listen to Senator Obama's message. People were turned away from the arena. Some were redirected to an adjunct Pavilion. From reports, parking is a problem in that area but still people arrived early and stood in the cold to lend their attention to a candidate. Senator Clinton's campaign is not attracting that level of enthusiasm and the whispers grow louder that her campaign operatives have been outflanked.

And it isn't because her campaign staff are dummies. Quite the contrary. It's because there's very little mythic energy to her message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. hit your three post limit yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. what does that mean...?
"three post limit" does not compute. please explain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
45. Not yet, thanks for caring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. many women are not surprised
From our first experiences in the workforce we learned the ropes by seeing women who devote themselves to a company, work very hard and finish every task,often for others who "needed a hand" and learn every aspect of the organization, its systems and its people. Then when there comes an opening in management for someone with just those skills and experiences, the company search a finds a younger guy with some relevant skills, but with "leadership" capacity (meaning not a woman) to become her new boss. She gets to teach him the ropes. In my younger days she's be bringing hom his coffee too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That scenario you describe does occur, but IMO is not related to the
Obama/Clinton nomination race.

Obama is now doing better with women voters than Clinton. It is not reasonable to assume that those women voters supporting Obama are unaware of workplace injustices. Nor is their vote any less than yours or mine.

Your scenario rings true in instances when it occurs, but the extension onto the nomination race is not persuasive. At the moment Barack Obama has a strong wind at his back and Hillary Clinton's camp is reacting to that success, but it is Democratic voters -- including women -- who are making the decisions at their voting booths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
18.  I was just describing a narrative scenario
not the polling details of the Great Obama-Clinton wars in which I am a conscientious objector. I'm thinking more of the historical curve of women's enfranchisement at the polls, in the schools, in the office, and it occurred to me that I see a metaphor playing itself out. I see a narrative arc that is broadly evocative to me, as it will be to many other women my age. I am looking at the big picture of history, not all polling, pushing, and spinning, however passionately pursued, of this disheartening fracas.

I am not calling a horse race
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I'm all for the long view.
But this is a nomination race, and I reject claims posted on DU and elsewhere that Senator Clinton is a "victim."

She needed stronger horses for this charge up the hill. Instead she selected plow horses from her husband's old barn.

And it is Obama's message that incorporates -- skillfully -- that historical trajectory, not Sen. Clinton's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #20
38. you just can't fucking quit can you
talking points, talking points, talking points. What do you do when you have to take time to chew the Rice Krispies? I'm thinking snap, crackle, pop would be a nice change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
82. Let me know if you want a dialogue on feminine archetypes, jeme.
You don't seem to be quite yourself right now.

PM me any time you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
50. What "historical trajectory" is Obama's campaign incorporating - the charge up the hill?! Sounds
like he's Teddy Roosevelt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #50
84. Actually, he is more akin to TR than Clinton is, and that's not so good
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 10:28 PM by Old Crusoe
for her campaign.

Hers is going a bit flat-line these days. She could revive it with some wins in the coming states, or she could fall farther behind. We'll have to see how WI, OH, TX, VT, HI, and RI go, and what the breakdown in demographics is.

The historical alignment is not parallel of course, but the charisma and the brains are a match between Obama and TR.

Good point.

As for the 'trajectory' comment, see also post #18, which references 'narrative arc.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
49. Nobody said they weren't voting for Obama. But the majority are for Hillary. And this happens all
the time and it's definitely happening in this race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #49
85. We'll likely see the total demographic breakdown after the March 4th contests,
to include both HI and WI.

We can see already that increasingly, women are supporting Obama, that Clinton is losing ground at the moment across almost all demographic groups. The Missouri primary is a case in point. It's tough to find a battleground state more battlegroundy than Missouri. It's offered some real cliffhangers over the years, including several races with Democratic women candidates. Harriet Wood, Jean Carnahan, Claire McCaskill, etc. -- all excellent candidates, but they had to find ways to campaign across all of the state. Not easy to do in a state that sent John Ashcroft to the U.S. Senate.

Clinton ran well in Missouri. Obama ran a notch better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. Obama's comment about his
weakness of not being able to keep track of papers, etc. and needing someone to help him with that was a carefully crafted statement to put women in the secretary category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. I'd need to see documentation of intent.
Short of that, I wouldn't worry about it.

Again, count the female vote for Obama, which increases each primary.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Like Obama supporters need to see documentation of
intent over all the shit they lay on Hillary.

His intent was obvious.....or do you really think he thinks his worst fault is a messy desk? Have some more Kool Aid.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. I'm sorry your candidate is not in the lead. I'm sorry she does not have
the momentum.

I'm sorry she relied too much on her husband's political chums for her success narrative.

She may even still win the nomination.

But it isn't looking good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Yeah, sure......
your candidate has had the press on his side to the point of ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Well, the nomination race occurs in reality. We're all observers.
Some of us are volunteers, some donors.

That process is a long-view process. The media are only one part, not all part.

Many women voters support Sentor Obama. You fail to address that part of the equation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. I've address that many times.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
83. ok. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
51. Thanks for the update from Obama central.
Why don't you take your favorite things - "books. music. travel. film. poetry." and include long winded fights about how men are better than women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #51
81. I haven't seen any claims to that effect around here. Have you?
If so, site them.

If not, it looks like you've gone astray on the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Now HOW do you know he wouldn't select a man for that job?.?.?
There are male secretaries nowadays, just like there are male nurses and other jobs once thought to be carried out only by women.

We've come a long way, baby.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. It would constitute discriminatory practice, in fact, on sexist grounds.
Good point, MM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
47. All too familiar. I really want Hillary in the WH, I think she'd be terrific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
62. You are talking about a
wealthy ivy league woman who has taken full advantage of every opportunity that life has offered her. She has the audacity to play the crying female victim in order to try to manipulate me to vote for her. It's low and pathetic and it puts an onus on women that isn't deserved if Hillary doesn't win.

She did not do me or any other women any favors by sending our kids and husbands off to war in order to appear more like "one of the boys".

You know... I asked everyone I talked to in the last few days... What is Margaret Thatcher's husband's name? How about Indira Ghandi's? How about Hillary Clinton's?

Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
12. I love all the analysis about how some of us think.
It's a classic tactic of trying to devalue people who don't share a position. I don't consider Obama perfect with no baggage, I just prefer him at this time. It's not about hating Clinton except for the other side (Republican).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. ah, a voice of reason
how bloody refreshing. I'll take seconds, please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. Egads!! Am I glad yore back to give us the straight poop

You can access the whole thing here. After you get done coloring, see if you can spot any sexism.


Erica Jong, :puke:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
52. No problem, I'm just here to serve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
15. NIE--not worth a read? Come on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. she reminds me of all those goldwater girls i went to school with
they all thought they were far better than the rest of us and when they spoke to us we were supposed to be thrilled. she may have changed her R for a D but she`s still that girl who thinks she can still thrill us by just the sound of her voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. C'mon get giddy and have a big juicy chocolate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. Sounds like you have some unresolved issues. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
53. Pulling out the old ammunition - you guys must be worried about BO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
54. Yep, you can always pick out the guys - especially the insecure ones who need a man in the WH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. "Barack appeals to those that want a clean slate, no baggage" . Bingo! something other then SOP BS
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 10:03 AM by jmg257
She reminds me of...every other professional politician who says and does whatever it takes to stay in power - or garner more.

NO thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
55. Another guy. I smell a trend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
23. I have no problem with her personally - I'm undedided between her and Obama
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 10:09 AM by Triana
neither of them are perfect as people or candidates.

But I'm getting sick of people trying to tell me who I hate and why.

And I'm getting sick of all the hatred towards Hillary and the misogynism on this site. The goddamned lamestream media and this misogynist country does a good enough job of it, don'tchathink? WHY is DU contributing to that? What does it serve? WHO does it serve?

It is UNbefitting anyone who calls themselves a "Democrat" - we do a better job of skewering our own than Freak Repube-lick does. And it is testimony to the fact that just because someone calls themselves a Democrat or Progressive - does NOT mean they're not sexist.

DU is the living, breathing proof of that.

Gotta problem with her policies, her record, her votes (or absence thereof) her rhetoric? FINE. SO DO I. I've got problems with Obama's too - AND with the attitudes and deliriousness of his congregation. But one can do without the rest of the right-wingnut shit-flinging here.

If we want to toss around right-wingnut talking points, lets go flapping and hyperventilating over Hussein Obama and the "fact" that he's a Muslim with "dark past" - yadda yadda.

IF we did that - WHO here would find that acceptable? Probably few.

BUT IT'S PERFECTLY OK to spew comparable right-wingnut talking points about Hillary and the Clinton family. Yap. That's 'different'.

sad.

Just.

sad.

Jesus H. Fricking Christ.

And you wonder why people sometimes say American Voters and/or Democrats are THEIR OWN WORST ENEMY.

Shit. Just spend a day on DU - the answers are all here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
25. No.
Try, it's because I think legacies are BS among other real reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
57. Another one....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. Thank you for your smarmy retort.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 02:01 PM by YOY
It's almost to Perry's level. Thanks for judging me based on my gender. Really proves you're above all of this, doesn't it?

It's really all about the genitals, no?

God forbid anyone of either gender dislike her for any reason...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #57
77. belittlement and condescension from a Clinton supporter?
I'm shocked! SHOCKED! SHOCKED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
26. How can peope accuse Obama of being empty while defending Hillary with psychobabble?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
27. Erica Jong does not speak for me. I find her piece irrelevant to my experiences and beliefs.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 10:15 AM by sparosnare
I'm sure others can find commonalities in what she says but I don't. Sometimes it's best to make the hard and often scary choice of change instead of sticking with what's comfortable.

To say that a clean slate is a "fairy tale" is complete bullshit. If I hadn't gone for the clean slate in my life (which was very difficult and a lot of work), I would not be where I am today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
35. Well she does not remind me of me!
I'm the daughter and granddaughter of steel workers. My dad wasn't born in this country. I attended a state run university and I never had to rely on my husband to help me get a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
37. She doesn't remind me of me, but she does remind me of my sister.
They even look alike. Of course, my sister is a Repub now, so there's that too. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
40. "The IWR resolution that Hillary voted for was based upon information...
...incorrect information as we now know, that was not available to many..."



Um, bullshit. *I* knew Iraq wasn't a threat. How come I fucking knew that and a United States Senator with access to all kinds of diplomats and info from sources other than the known liars in the Executive branch didn't know it? She's either lying or incompetent, and her saber-rattling w/r/t Iran suggests she's both. Every Senator who's used the "if I knew then..." excuse about the IWR is full of steaming, putrid shit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
42. Right - it's not her, it's us. Priceless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
46. Wow, that spoke to me deeply.
Thanks for posting, elixir,

DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
48. Hillary has NO INTEGRITY, why won't she release her tax returns until after the convention?
Why won't they release the papers locked away in the Clinton Library?

Why did she lie about the Levin Amendment during the California debate?

Why did she sell her e-mail list?

Why does she take money from lobbyists?

Etc Etc Etc


NO Integrity, not even close.


It isn't about me, it is about the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. .. and another.. boy, why don't you guys get a job instead of sitting in your pjs on DU?
The men are just afraid of a woman president who has a record of enacting legislation and reaching across the aisle to the other side - sounds like a real problem to me. Yeh, let's get behind the candidate with no proven track record, already making mistakes on votes and record, who can't debate.. and support his run for the WH because he's a man.

Good idea....no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. One can see that you skipped over the female dissenters, around 1/2 of the total
You have no idea where/whatthe f*** you are posting, do you?

Seriously, you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #59
86. I have Bella Abzug PJs.
They're awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
56. I'm against Hillary because she practices a politics of exclusion
She draws the line around her Chosen People and would leave the rest of America to suffer. If you don't buy into her version of "the American Dream" she WILL make you suffer. It's how her husband was and it's how she will be if, god forbid, she ever becomes president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. ...and another...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. You are a sexist pig. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. Takes one to know one, 'eh?

What number are YOU toots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #73
80. Anti-Hillary + male = male chauvinist
is the most sexist formulation I can possibly imagine. Find me one sexist thing I've actually said on this site and get back to me with your offensive fucking pictures, fascist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
61. Bring on the therapy...
I share several behavioral characteristics with Hillary and, yet, I have no interest in supporting her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. bring on the exorcist ;)
"The power of Christ compels you."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
66. I don't know, I like her, but I don't identify with her, we kind of don't have a lot in common
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 01:47 PM by Hill_YesWeWill
you know, there's a lot of people in this country that are younger than 50, I know maybe it's hard for baby boomers to believe that, but, we can vote too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
69. Sigh
"I personally believe she made the right choices. The IWR resolution that Hillary voted for was based upon information, incorrect information as we now know.."

Sorry, but I don't buy it. You're right though in that Senators have information not available to the general public and it is because of this fact I believe they are all lying when they say they didn't know because this short video clip shows what information they already had.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsVKDY74C0g



"Barack appeals to those that want a clean slate, no baggage - dare I say "a fairytale".

"I will choose experience and integrity over hopes and dreams every time."

You're contradicting yourself. On one hand you're basically admitting Hillary comes to the table with "baggage" but then try and assert that she has integrity. Which is it? Baggage or integrity?

As for me, I'll choose someone who isn't all talk, nor talks out both sides of his mouth every time over someone who has experience doing so.



Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
74. I had enough information to know the case for Iraq was bogus.
In fact, I told my father ON 9/11 that the next thing that would happen would be we would come up with false reasons to invade Iraq.

But more importantly, plenty of congress people had enough information to vote against the IWR from day one. The argument that "I just didn't know!" is bullshit. It was "I just didn't want to be on an unpopular side of the issue (since the majority of Americans supported the move to war at the time, according to polls) because I'm going to run for President."

That's not leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
75. Not even fucking close.......
Hillary Clinton is nothing like me.

To begin with, I don't bring my husband on my job interviews.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
78. On the IWR
Akaka (D-HI), Bingaman (D-NM), Boxer (D-CA), Byrd (D-WV), Conrad (D-ND), Corzine (D-NJ), Dayton (D-MN), Durbin (D-IL), Feingold (D-WI), Graham (D-FL), Inouye (D-HI), Kennedy (D-MA), Leahy (D-VT), Levin (D-MI), Mikulski (D-MD), Murray (D-WA), Reed (D-RI), Sarbanes (D-MD), Stabenow (D-MI), Wellstone (D-MN), Wyden (D-OR), Chafee (R-RI) and Jeffords (I-VT)

These 23 are the ones with experience and integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
79. She reminds me of cluster bombs and NAFTA n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC