Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby Polls are WRONG and here's why....folks and Clinton will win

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:25 AM
Original message
Zogby Polls are WRONG and here's why....folks and Clinton will win
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 09:41 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
Obama is still a political unknown. He is undefined. His negatives--- Like those of McCain, Clinton or even Huckabee--- have yet to really be examined because the Democratic primary race has been a referendum on Clinton moreso than a real comparison of the two candidates and their policies.

<b>The more Americans get to know about Obama's policies, rather than his "rock star" image, the higher his negatives will climb and the more his support amongst independents will drop.</b>

What you see with these polls is Obama's ceiling. His positives will not stay so high as the race narrows to two people and more focus can be spent on JUST him and McCain, rather than Huckabee and Clinton (and Romney and Edwards) as it has been for the past several months. His negatives can climb.

On the other end, Clinton's support right now are her floor. The people that "hate" her (for whatever irrational reason fuelled by Conservative media), have already solidified opinions of her. Her negatives are unlikely to go up, because there is nothing new to dislike her for. Her positives would likely go up once she is the presumptive nominee and Democrats are faced with a choice of Clinton or McCain.



Also, this statement shows the reliability of this survey:

"The online survey shows that Obama would defeat both McCain and Huckabee, while Clinton would lose to McCain and only defeat Huckabee by a small margin."

Again, we are all well aware that Obama's support is highest amongst young people, college educated people and the upper class--- All demographics that spend significant time on the internet.

Working class, middle-age and the elderly are Clinton's base, and they spend less time on the internet than Obama's demographics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think at this point we can say typical political models don't apply.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 09:27 AM by sparosnare
How to take the pulse of a movement? Impossible. You are assuming Obama has a ceiling - prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. This should be a mantra for Obama supporters...
Yep, nothing typical about this race.

I don't see a ceiling...:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. As a blank slate, people paint what they want on the image of Obama.
It has nothing to do with who he really is, what he has done, or what his policies are.

They just "imagine" that he is their perfect candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Obama is not a blank slate. Where have you been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. he most certainly is....never even heard of the man before he read a Ted Sorensen speech in Boston
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 02:05 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
and nothing after until he became a Senator 2 yrs ago...he served 1 friggen yr and has been absent for this entire year out on the stump


Who does that other than someone the corporations want to do their bidding...where did all that money come from to put him where he is today?

think about it!

what other UNKNOWN rises that FAST to these heights???

Why do you think he likes reagan and called "the GOP the party of ideas"??

Please, use your minds folks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Zogby notwithstanding, Barack Obama is the political story of the hour,
and there's a good chance it's going to be extended for well more than just the hour and on into November.

The people showing up to cast votes for the man make a very convincing poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. every poll that i disagree with is wrong...
whereas, every poll is agree with is right....regardless of how things turn out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary will never be president.
She has 0 chance of beating McCain, especially when you consider that she's getting creamed by Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. IMO, if we nominate Hillary, we are commiting suicide by election.
She will NEVER beat McCain.

Look, this is NOT scientific or anything, but I have been involved in politics since I was in the 6th grade and snuck out behind the backs of my totally GOP parents to work for JFK. I am a politics junkie and I have been through a lot of national elections and at the point in time, I think I do have a feel for what is going on around me.

Of my gal pals, who all but one are Dems and of those Dems most are on the liberal side, only one of us likes Hillary and this one is conflicted about voting for her. All the rest of us Dems intensely dislike her. And we are all coming from different places and different levels of education, from GED HS diploma only to doctorate am masters degrees. The only thing we all have in common is that we all are over age 55, white, and female.

Of the lonely Repubbie in our midst, she intensely dislikes Hillary to the point of hate..and is not real favorable about Obama, but does not hate him or dislike him. However, she cannot stand McCain and voted for Romney in the Calif primary. As of late, in our coffee get togethers, she has listened intently to the discussions about Obama. If it is a McCain v. Hillary battle in the fall, she will vote for McCain. If it is McCain v. Obama, she is undecided at this point. At least there is hope there.

With the dicussions we have been having, this is the general situation that most of us have encountered outside our little group as well.

Again, this is nothing scientific, but what I am seeing is consistent with what is being reported nationally ~~ Hillary is losing her base of white females. There has been a change over the months and those who started out at least nuetral about her, now dislike her. There are various reasons for this, but all do in some manner state that they do not believe she has a chance in hell of beating McCain.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. I was talking on the phone with my mother, a life long democrat.
I was amazed when she told me that if it comes down to Clinton v McCain she she would be voting McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilyWondr Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Why?
I hear posts like yours almost everyday here on DU and would really like to know what would drive any Dem to vote for mccain? What in mccain's platform does she agree with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I think for the most part it is an anti-DLC vote she thinks that the DLC need to get beat bad
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 11:34 AM by LeviathanCrumbling
or else the Democrats will continue to be the left-wing of the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. And I have life long Democrats in my family that have said if Obama is the nominee...
They would probably vote for McCain.

Anecdotal evidence is just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Has Hillary been able to capture more than 40% of any contest since 2/5?
Just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent-Voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Nope - she's only won one state by more than 60%: Arkansas
Meanwhile, Obama has kicked her ass by at least 60% in damn near every state he's won in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Are these recent quotes?
I thought I read something like this a few months ago, and it certainly doesn't take into account the number of new (young and old) voters finding a reason to participate in this election cycle. Morever, as candidates find out, there IS NO FLOOR. At any moment something (even said in jest) can sink a campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Half of the country dislikes her - I'd hope her negatives wouldn't go higher! (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. The opposite seems to be true
the more they get to know him and see him. His numbers go up. He's started 20 points down in almost every state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElboRuum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Young voters, first and second timers...
...WILL be the deciding factor in the general election and in the primaries. And it should be noted that ALL demographics are spending more time on the internet and using it more as a first choice or a solid second choice for news and political opinion.

Teh Internets Tubes isn't jes for the young'uns anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Obama is still a political unknown. He is undefined." And he shall
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 09:51 AM by Benhurst
remain so until he is nominated, then the corporate press and KKKarl will go after him.

Think of John Kerry saluting the Democratic Convention in 2004, thinking his heroic record in Vietnam would be a plus running against AWOL Bush. Then remember what happened.

Fasten your seat belts! It's going to be a bumpy campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. When is all this "enlightenment" going to happen? The race is almost over and she is almost done.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 09:54 AM by jmg257
His wins have been by larger and larger margins. Yes there ARE states left, but are there enough - is there enough time - to fix her failing campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. James Zogby is an Obama superdelegate. Zogby had him up by 13 on the days of the NH and CA primaries
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 09:56 AM by Yossariant
And we know how well those predictions turned out. :evilgrin:

Zogby is nothing more than an Obama shill.

I am not letting them jam this untried, cheap, opportunistic celebrity down my throat -- for President?!

:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. John Zogby is the pollster. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. James Zogby is a senior analyst for Zogby International.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. In his brother John's company in addition to many other activities, as you no doubt already know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. Even if you don't take the poll numbers into account, there may
be another problem with the current level of support shown for Obama. Much of his support is from young people and they typically don't vote in the same numbers that middle aged or older people do. They have been there for the primaries, but that doesn't mean that they will be voting in the GE.

-----

<snip>
In an October CBS News/New York Times Poll, just 58 percent of Americans under 30 said they were registered to vote. Ninety-three percent of those over 65 were. Thirty is a dividing line, it seems. Among those 30 to 44, 87 percent reported being registered. (Self-reported registration rates in polls are usually higher than they really are. Some of that disparity is because many of the unregistered are not reached by household polling -- like non-English speakers, and people who live in institutions -- and some of it is because saying you are registered is socially desirable.)

However, two-thirds of the under-30s in our last poll admitted they hadn’t voted in 2004, though more than two-thirds of them had been old enough to vote in 2004. Only 17 percent were sure that they would participate in a primary in 2008.
<snip>
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/12/05/opinion/pollpositions/main3577733.shtml
------

Also, when you consider the average of several polls, there just isn't much distance between the two candidates.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/democratic_presidential_nomination-191.html


IMO, it's too early for either candidate to consider that the nomination is settled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. You've got that backwards --
Those that turn out for primaries are those who are motivated to turn out for the GE. It is the older, less motivated voter that turns out in the GE in greater numbers than in the primaries.

The result is the same - that there is a higher proportion of older voters to younger voters in the GE. However, Obama has been brining them out for the primary in record numbers - they WILL vote in the GE if Obama is the nominee. If he is not, that might be a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
18. I just don't buy into your assumptions.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 10:26 AM by Atman
First of all, when you use phrases such as "The people that "hate" her (for whatever irrational reason fuelled by Conservative media),..." it loses a lot of us "haters," (if by haters, I assume you mean those of us who do not believe Hillary Clinton would be best for the country at this time). It makes it painfully obvious that it is in fact you who appear to have made up her mind and won't be swayed.

But okay, -- your opinion is well written and clear. But it is also condescending and presupposes that people who support Obama are just too dumb to realize what is happening to us. I cast my absentee ballot for John Edwards literally the day before he announced he was suspending his campaign. Obama was not my first choice, in part because of some of the issues Clinton's supporters think none of us realize. But I think the so-called skeletons in Obama's closet, which btw, are about as secret as who leaked Valerie Plame's name, are trivial compared to what an Obama presidency would mean for the national psyche.

We're a bruised and battered nation at the moment, thanks in large part to the policies of not just George Bush, but of Bill Clinton, too, and Hillary Clinton's apparent lack of judgement in dealing with W's demands. Regardless of how wonderful things may have been (or appeared to be) during Bill Clinton's term, things suck now, and people don't want to just throw slipcovers on the futon, they need a whole-house makeover.

Put another way; I am far less concerned about what I don't know about Obama than about what I do know about Clinton.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. Obama's ground up personal campaigning is not measured
He is running a meet the people campaign. People trust him because he is specific about everyday things that matter to people. He is willing to spend real time with them.
Hillary sends out impersonal generic messages that are supposed to be molded into anyone's life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
20. I tend to agree with your analysis
In any case, we shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. yes we will...fasten your seatbelts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
21. By the time we find Obama's negatives he will already have been elected...
..and whatever they are, we'll be stuck with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Hillary still hasn't found them yet? She dug so deep on him she brought up Kindergarten essays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
25. The Closed Government Wing of the party Hillary needs is shrinking.
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 11:28 AM by blm
And the gullible base isn't as gullible as it once was for Clintons.

Hang onto your hats, Bush-Clinton-Bush protectors, because Open Government WILL prevail. I hope you decide to support it when it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
31. I question how you come to determine where the floor or the ceiling
for each candidate is. Just cuz you say so? I see Hill as being well-known for a reasonably long time, so I would conclude that she is at the ceiling of her popularity; whereas less is known about Obama indicating the floor of his potential popularity. I think you have this completely backwards, and I doubt it will sway any anti-Clinton voters or excite any pro-Clinton worriers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. I'm sure you do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #38
44. So you are unable to give an explanation as to your evaluation? Hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
33. Zogby blew it on california & NH - he always takes sides in elections. It was Dean
in 2004, and he was openly bashing Clark in his comments...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
35.  Voters will tire of "Mr.Magnificent" before it's too late. Don't worry. (eom)
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 02:42 PM by oasis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
37. So then , good news for War and status quo
Because that's the wing that Hillary represents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. aye....me thinks yer be in dire need of one of these capt'n....
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 07:39 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
41. Wasn't Zogby for Clinton?
Come on.. you can do better than that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
42. Polls are a snapshot in time. They're not a predictor.
The problem with Clinton is that many people (in the high forty percent area according to some polls) hate her already. At least fifteen years worth of hate. Obama may suffer the same fate over the course of the campaign, but nobody knows. I think there are plenty of other metrics on which these candidates can be judged beyond "which one do the Republicans hate the least?" When I caucused last weekend I heard very little talk about "electablity."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC