thevoiceofreason
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:29 PM
Original message |
"Electoral College" Results So Far: Obama - 179, Clinton - 156 |
|
This excludes Florida and Michigan. I know, I know, go ahead and post your rejoinders that they should be added. I didn't include them because I feel their elections violated the Constitution -- there was no free speech.
Also not included, New Mexico's 5 electoral votes.
|
jakem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
1. what is up in NM? anyone know? |
thevoiceofreason
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I think tomorrow is the deadline |
|
In their defense, they did say they would wait and announce the final tally once, not piecemeal.
|
jakem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
and what happened to those ballots that spent the night in someone's house?
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
12. Some well placed Clinton supporters tried to steal the election, got caught will ballot boxes |
|
And who knows what is happening now?
The United Nations should have to run the New Mexico elections. Cheating in the vote counting is as New Mexico as Roswell.
|
skipos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
3. But Obama's states don't matter |
|
We only care about the Dukakis states!
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
5. How is this relevant ? |
|
You have made a weird assumption.
|
thevoiceofreason
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. I saw someone speculate HRC would lead if it was winner take all |
|
So, I did this little exercise for grins. AAnd, of course, I have these 3 posts available and burning a hole in my pocket.
|
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Thanks for doing this.. I was wondering about that ! |
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. How is "winner take all" related to the electoral college? n/t |
thevoiceofreason
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. Electoral college is winner take all |
|
I know delegates are a completely different concept -- I was just having fun blending the counting approaches in response to a post I had seen earlier that was speculating it would go the other way.
|
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Are NMs delegates split or winner take all? Either way, I 'm assuming not much change in count when |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 12:35 PM by K Gardner
they are tallied. Edited to add: Nevermind.. thought the OP was tallying delegates.
|
Yossariant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Democrats have no winner-take-all primaries. |
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Thanks, I thought that was the case :-) |
Yossariant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. We can't stand to see anybody lose. |
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
9. electoral votes are irrelevent in the primaries. |
|
any assumptions based on 'electoral college' votes are invalid. They are based on nothing.
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. Looks like someone has too much time on their hands and |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |