Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Electoral College" Results So Far: Obama - 179, Clinton - 156

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:29 PM
Original message
"Electoral College" Results So Far: Obama - 179, Clinton - 156
This excludes Florida and Michigan. I know, I know, go ahead and post your rejoinders that they should be added. I didn't include them because I feel their elections violated the Constitution -- there was no free speech.

Also not included, New Mexico's 5 electoral votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. what is up in NM? anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think tomorrow is the deadline
In their defense, they did say they would wait and announce the final tally once, not piecemeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Oy.

and what happened to those ballots that spent the night in someone's house?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Some well placed Clinton supporters tried to steal the election, got caught will ballot boxes
And who knows what is happening now?

The United Nations should have to run the New Mexico elections. Cheating in the vote counting is as New Mexico as Roswell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. But Obama's states don't matter
We only care about the Dukakis states!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. How is this relevant ?
You have made a weird assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I saw someone speculate HRC would lead if it was winner take all
So, I did this little exercise for grins. AAnd, of course, I have these 3 posts available and burning a hole in my pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Thanks for doing this.. I was wondering about that !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. How is "winner take all" related to the electoral college? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Electoral college is winner take all
I know delegates are a completely different concept -- I was just having fun blending the counting approaches in response to a post I had seen earlier that was speculating it would go the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Are NMs delegates split or winner take all? Either way, I 'm assuming not much change in count when
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 12:35 PM by K Gardner
they are tallied. Edited to add: Nevermind.. thought the OP was tallying delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Democrats have no winner-take-all primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thanks, I thought that was the case :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. We can't stand to see anybody lose.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. electoral votes are irrelevent in the primaries.
any assumptions based on 'electoral college' votes are invalid. They are based on nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Looks like someone has too much time on their hands and
not enough common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC