CNN's Hillary Shills - Jessica Yellen and Candy Crawley

[TexasObserver]

CNN has been trying every way it can to skew news to help Hillary. Perhaps the worst two are the "Candy and Jessica Show."

Watch these two shill for Hillary some time. They are without any journalist pride or integrity at all. They are selling, selling, selling.

It's not just those two, but they are two of the worst, and seem to work in tandem.

Have you seen it? Tell me, have you seen it?

[Olney Blue]

1. I've never see Candy shill for a Democrat. I will never forgive her

mean coverage of Kerry.

[murbley40]

3. Me either, Never and especially not Hillary.

[TexasObserver]

7. Then you must not be watching her the past week.

She's shilling for her alright.

[Name removed]

44. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[TexasObserver]

46. thanks for sharing

[Hoof Hearted]

49. Sharing that you've racked up over 1000+ posts per week in the last 2 weeks?

Yeah, I find it pertinent to the conversation.

If you're putting in 12 hour days on DU, that's over 24 posts per hour on average.

That's ASTOUNDING.

[UALRBSofL]

15. This is what you call a BASH Hillary post

Calling reporters a shill without evidence of this is merely flaming. Someone posted the other day statistics of the positives and negatives each candidate gets from the MSM. Yes, there is actually a group that keeps statistics on this. Hillary was way negative and Obama was very much positive. So, OP, flame away.

[dansolo]

37. The OP was talking about specific reporters

The overall coverage for Obama may be more positive, but that doesn't mean that -particular reporters' coverage isn't skewed the other way.

[blm]

2. Not so much shilling for Hillary, but keeping their major SHAREHOLDER happy.

Kingdom Holdings trusts Bushes and Clintons. They do NOT want that cycle broken.

Dubai and Saudi royals have long been protected by the secrecy and privilege that Bushes and Clintons respect and protect for each other.


http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html

[TexasObserver]

10. Yes, like Bush, she works for the Saudis.

[Sadie5]

18. Proof!!!

That HRC works for the Saudi's.

[TexasObserver]

26. She works for the Defense industry, the Telecom industry, the Insurance industry.

She's in bed with even worse.

[Sadie5]

35. Hey Texas Observer

I will think you are more credible if you have a star by your name. Otherwise I might think you just dropped by to cause mischief.

[racaulk]

43. Dude has 2,009 posts (at last check) since 1/31/2008.

Where's that troll spray when you need it...

[Hoof Hearted]

50. Mine is empty. It's been too hard to keep up with them in here.

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

59. Record!!!

:wow:

[TexasObserver]

47. Hey Demo5

I will think you have something intelligent to say if you say something intelligent. You haven't yet. Try again.

[Hoof Hearted]

53. HA HA! Having your old profile sig in the open for everyone to see sure made you squirm!

You changed that lickety split, didn't you?!

Why? Because your sig was sexist garbage! That's why!

"I need a lover that won't drive me crazy. Some girl that knows the meaning of "hey, hit the highway."

[TexasObserver]

55. Hey Hoof Hearted.

I'll drop you in the outhouse with the other Hill Shills that have nothing to say.

I give all of you a few chances to redeem yourself, but ultimately, you all end up in the same stinky pile.

[Hoof Hearted]

60. Nah, you'll be long gone after Hillary wins the nomination. I'll still be here. Your sexist ass

will be sharpening up your keyboard for whatever your next gig is.


You can shove your "redemption" right up your ass where you found it. I don't need you for a damn thing. You are quite appropriately just a flash in the pan, and soon I won't have to put up with you stinking up the place anymore.

[TexasObserver]

54. Hey Demo5

I'll drop you in the outhouse with the other Hill Shills that have nothing to say.

I give all of you a few chances to redeem yourself, but ultimately, you all end up in the same stinky pile.

[TexasObserver]

56. Ah, that's better. Sometimes you just have to flush the toilet.

[LisaM]

4. Candy Crowley does not seem skewed to Hillary at all.

On what do you base that?

I can't forgive her for what she did to Gore, much less Kerry.

[Sadie5]

6. Hey! wait a minute

I just watched the candidates and candy never treated HRC any better that the others were treated. Try the truth...it works.

[TexasObserver]

12. Hey, Yes she does!

[Sadie5]

36. How about some proof

Sorry...just your say so is not good enough. Good old fashion proof such as news articles etc will do. Get a star texas observer or AKA...mischief maker troll.

[TexasObserver]

48. How about watching CNN and seeing?

And stop violating the DU rules or I'll have to alert on your posts. I've let it slide twice, but won't do so again.

[The_Casual_Observer]

What, they aren't kissing Obama's feet? Off with their heads!

[ShortnFiery]

9. Nope, I beg to differ. Only "The Queen" is authorized to give that order per Alice's protocol.

:evilgrin: :silly:

[ShortnFiery]

5. It was a full court press to spin positive = perhaps it was the excitement of "the first surrogate"

stumping for his wife that made it a full blown Mardi Gras? :shrug:

[goldcanyonaz]

8. Quick! Send Jessica and Candy some Kool-aid.

[BigDDem]

11. Example?

[BlackVelvet04]

13. That's ridiculous...

Candy Crawley knocks Hillary all the time.

Too much fairy dust, dude.

[LisaM]

14. Nobody can produce an example

When has she ever favored HRC over another candidate?

[apnu]

17. Candi?!?! You're kidding right? That's sarcasim I smell right?

She's been in Bushco's pocket a long time now. I bet they gave here a night in the Lincoln bedroom.


Sheesh.

[TexasObserver]

28. When Jeb's son marries Chelsea, THE ROYAL FAMILY will be complete.

All the Bushes and the Clintons need is a marriage of state to formally bind their interests.

[apnu]

33. no kidding

this is like a sign of the apocalypse.

[TexasObserver]

34. The BushClinton master plan: 8 years of Hillary. 8 years of Jeb. 16 years of Chelsea and Jeb's kid

[QC]

16. It's nothing that few weeks of forced chanting and sleep deprivation can't fix. n/t

[DS1]

19. Candy Crawley is a miserable asshole who needs to climb back under her bridge

[Cameron27]

20. I've been watching CNN

instead of MSNBC for awhile now, and you're absolutely wrong. Neither of those two have any 'love' for HRC. What a joke.

[TexasObserver]

24. Then you would have heard Jessica Yellen reporting from the state of Washington

last week, when her open mike caught her saying she didn't want to interview the Washington governor because "she's for HIM, that's the problem!"

If you can watch the spin for Hillary on CNN and not see it, that explains your avatar.

But thanks for playing!

[calico1]

21. Candy Crowley is a shill for Hillary???

If that's true I'd hate to see what the MSM people that DON'T like her have to say!

:eyes:

[TexasObserver]

25. Yes, she's a Hill Shill.

You know who can't see it? Hillary fans.

[BigDDem]

22. Hey, you're like BO

no specifics!

:rofl:

[russian33]

23. oh my god, i'm pissing my pants

Candy Crawley ....shill....for....Hillary....iamgoingtodielaughing!!!!!!!!!!!

[AlCzervik]

27. do you a different cnn from the one i have? Crowley shills for the corporation and her man George W

[calico1]

29. Oh I get it!

It must be a different Candy Crowley who also happens to work for CNN!

:silly:

[TexasObserver]

32. I don't expect Hillary fans to agree. Delusion runs deep.

[TexasObserver]

30. She doesn't have Bush to shill for, so Hillary is the next closest thing.

[Captain Hilts]

31. Crowley has NEVER shilled for a Democrat. Certainly, not Hillary. Obama supporters complaining...

about press treatment?

Give me a break!

[SaveOurDemocracy]

38. Candy Crowley a 'Hillary Shill' ???

Now THAT'S funny!!


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


You're on a real mission of hate, aren't you TexasObserver? Try observing a little reality.

[QC]

40. It's hard to keep the quality up while churning out a thousand posts per week. n/t

[racaulk]

41. I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed that.

2,000+ posts since 1/31/08? And every single one that I've seen has been some stupid tripe about Hillary.

Hmmm...

[Hoof Hearted]

51. If the dude's been putting 12 hour days in, that's an avg. of 24 posts PER HOUR

for 12 hours, every day.

That's serious dedication!

[Beaverhausen]

57. I'm noticing that too

hmmm is right

[QC]

61. Perfectly obvious what's going on. n/t

[TexasObserver]

39. Candy and Jessica remind me of Chris Farley and David Spade in The Gap skit they did

Can't you see the similar dynamic?

[racaulk]

42. .

:eyes:

[Name removed]

45. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[bridgit]

52. I've never seen Crowley give props to HRC for anything...

:shrug:

[TexasObserver]

58. I want to thank all the Hill Shills for kicking the thread.

Like Hillary, not very smart and not very capable, but you do serve a useful purpose, if only to allow Obama to look so great by comparison.

[bridgit]

62. Well aren't you precious. Ya'know, some would think that Obama supporters...

would take his lead on this 'change' bullshit, and change their shrieking tone of condescension, derision, division, and debasement. It is just such a tacky spectacle to watch Obama supporters ignore the hopes & dreams of their own candidate.

With your post here and many, many others elsewhere it is clear imo that far too many Obamaphiles aren't even capable of the level of change he's referring to.