jjr5
(317 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 01:53 PM
Original message |
Inside the Clinton staff? |
|
<iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/23154327#23154327" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
I couldn't believe this when I watched this. Does anybody know more about this guy? Does Clinton really operate her campaign like Bush?
|
MethuenProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Why are you pimping for the Right Wing? |
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. "pimping" so that word is ok now? Or like everything else anything |
|
is ok if it is done for the Clintons.
|
elixir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Boy, this is very telling. I'm flattered that the MSM cares this much about a campaign that's losng |
elixir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Tucker Carlson, oh, where do I begin? Hmm, such a loser w/ no credibility. |
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Tucker the Dancing Dick, video from his Dancing with the Stars failure. |
jjr5
(317 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Sorry about Tucker Carlson by the way |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 02:03 PM by jjr5
The interview just happened to be on his show. He's kind of biased, but still the story itself poses some troubling questions for me. I didn't particularly like Hillary Clinton, but I at least trusted her to some extent. But maybe she operates her campaigns and would maybe even operate a future government in the same crony-esq style as Bush has for the past 7 1/2 years. A democrat thinking like that is just really surprising to me.
|
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Here's a non-MSNBC report of the |
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. "We were lying about money," a source said. "The cash on hand was nothing." |
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. It's never helpful when your mistakes fit too well with the |
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. They're still lying about the money. |
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. What are they saying? n/t |
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. Well, I don't mind MSNBC. I watch it because |
|
I can't stand Wolf Blitzer on CNN and Fox is blocked at our house. Anyway. A Wall Street Journal reporter was interviewed on MSNBC a few minutes ago and she was telling about Clinton campaign staff member screaming at one another before this all blew up last week.
|
Egnever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message |
9. These two articles tell a pretty grim tale. |
|
The first one was written right after NH and was pooo pooed as nonsense in some of the responses. It is amazingly accurate though knowing what we know now. http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=75e41edb-784d-4f9a-ba6e-08cab93d09aehttp://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200802u/patti-solis-doyle/2
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. This is scary. Hillary |
|
is really starting to remind me of Bush!
|
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. That was my first thought. |
|
There was no Plan B for Iraq, either.
|
jjr5
(317 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-14-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 02:28 PM by jjr5
Please take a breath for a second. I don't want to cause any trouble - we all care about our government. However, that just emphasizes my point. Clinton should not be choosing loyalists already. It just isn't right, at all.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-15-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |