Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jim Hightower gives keynote address at Greens National Convention for Ralph Nader.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:34 PM
Original message
Jim Hightower gives keynote address at Greens National Convention for Ralph Nader.
Now he's campaigning for Obama?
_____________________________

The Greens are holding their national convention in Denver in late June. Nader has tapped Native American activist and author Winona LaDuke as his running mate. Texas populist Jim Hightower will deliver the keynote address, and featured speakers will include anti-nuclear activist Helen Caldicott, 1980 independent presidential candidate John Anderson, Columbia University professor Manning Marable and Tony Mazzocchi, one of the chief organizers of the Labor Party.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/24/16/nichols2416.html

I cancelled my subscription to Hightower's news letter in December 2000.

Bush and Gore are exactly the same. Bush and Gore are exactly the same. Bush and Gore are exactly the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well...I have to congratulate Obama on this endorsement.
Hell, I voted for Nader in 2000. I'm sure as hell not going to condemn anyone else for their past support of Nader.

Jim Hightower is a good man. I always thought he'd make a great Secretary of Agriculture in a Democratic administration. Good for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. he got Susan "mock the Palm Beach voters" Sarandon too - the whole gang is there
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 07:38 PM by robbedvoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. This was in 2000.
I'm sure a lot of ex-Greens are now voting for the right people this time.

Is Nader running at this time? No. Considering, yes, but not running.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The right people got pushed out of the
process. I am glad I stayed Green.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent
I'm glad that he sees the importance of punishing the right-wing Clintons by making them lose the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Trouble with Hightower is that he accomplishes nothing.
The populists always end up on the wrong side of things & unwittingly end up lending support to the right wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nader endorsed John Edwards this year.....
and so, what are you saying?

That because you've gone from progressive to corporate, that somehow every else becomes suspect?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I question the common sense of anyone who supported Nader in 2000.
I'm not alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. But you kind of are.
Again Nader supported Edwards this year.

Hightower supports Obama this year.

Why are you stuck in the year 2000?

Oh, yeah....you must be a Hillary supporter living in the past of the Bill heady NAFTA days or something. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I'm uncommitted. Whoever wins is fine with me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Heh, heh.
Well-timed.

I didn't think the Hightower endorsement was great either.

Now, Joe Wilson and Wes Clark, THOSE are good endorsements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. in other words,
"don't you dare support a third party candidate, ever, or I'll hold my breath until I turn blue every time I see your name in print for the rest of my life".

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That would have been a good year not to support a third party candidate.
Many of us were screaming it that year. Trading our votes. Anything we could do.

It. Was. Not. A. Secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. that would have been a good year not to run a center-right campaign.
Many of us were screaming that as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That's true too.
But less than one half of 1% of 90,000+ Florida Nader voters had to know what was happening.

Maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. they were voting for their preferred candidate.
What's to know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You say potato...
...I say thirty years of a Corporate Right-Wing Supreme Court.

Let's call the whole thing off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. you say tomato...
I say NAFTA and "the end of welfare as we know it". Unfortunately, it's too late to call it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. So Obama's winning us Republican, Indy and Green voters. Good for him!
It means if Obama's the nominee, we won't have to worry about Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC