Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DNC not backing down on FL and MI delegates.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:01 PM
Original message
DNC not backing down on FL and MI delegates.
Here is a statement from a DNC spokesperson, making it clear that there are only two options for those states at this point.

DNC refuses to back down Michigan, Florida delegates

MILWAUKEE (AP) -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton desperately wants meaningless wins in Florida and Michigan to turn into votes she can count on. It won't be easy with the Democratic National Committee rules standing in her way. The DNC is refusing to back down from the tough sanctions it imposed on the two states, which held early contests in violation of party rules. They have been stripped of all their delegates to the national convention in August where either Clinton or rival Barack Obama will be nominated for president.

The DNC has offered Florida and Michigan a couple ways out in compliance with party rules. First, they could hold second nominating contests, but Democratic leaders in both states reject that idea. Or they can appeal to the DNC's credentials committee, a 186-member body that usually operates in obscurity and has a complicated membership and rules process that will require deft maneuvering in this divided campaign.


More about the committee.

Clinton's operatives want DNC chairman Howard Dean to come up with a resolution, but Dean is staying out of the fight for now. Dean spokesman Karen Finney said Florida and Michigan still have a choice to follow the rules.

"At this point, there are still more than 1,000 pledged delegates to be determined and 33 percent of our party has yet to have the opportunity to have their voices heard, so it would be premature to speculate," Finney said. Dean declined an interview request. Most of the credentials committee members will be appointed by the Clinton and Obama campaigns, depending on how they perform in nominating contests across the country, with Dean having already named 25. Although Obama has won more contests so far, Clinton has won most of the larger states -- and larger states get more seats. So there's the potential for the committee to be closely divided if the race stays tight.


I think the DNC is planning on being very fair, as fair as they can be under such circumstances. Two big states deliberately and noisily broke the rules, even though there was a Supreme Court precedent saying the DNC has the upper hand on this issue.

Democratic Party of U.S. v. Wisconsin..1981


"The State has a substantial interest in the manner in which its elections are conducted, and the National Party has a substantial interest in the manner in which the delegates to its National Convention are selected. But these interests are not incompatible, and to the limited extent they clash in this case, both interests can be preserved. The National Party rules do not forbid Wisconsin to conduct an open primary. But if Wisconsin does open its primary, it cannot require that Wisconsin delegates to the National Party Convention vote there in accordance with the primary results, if to do so would violate Party rules. Since the Wisconsin Supreme Court has declared that the National Party cannot disqualify delegates who are bound to vote in accordance with the results of the Wisconsin open primary, its judgment is reversed.

It is so ordered."


Howard Dean publicly offered his opinion about the role of the superdelegates and the DNC itself. It went pretty much unnoticed because of the blathering of Chris Matthews who said in that interview that he was trying to trip Dean up...to get him to say stuff he was not supposed to say. He kept interrupting Dean so it was hard to hear what Dean was really saying.

He appeared to be issuing an opinion for others to wait and let the voters finish having their say.

Dean said let the voters speak first.

I mean, let‘s listen to the voters before we—you know, on television everybody handicaps everything. I‘ve sort of given up watching television in between these elections because people blab and blab and blab. But the fact is, the voters—it‘s the voters‘ turn.

....."DEAN: It‘s not the pundits‘ turn. It‘s not the pollsters‘ turn. This is the voters‘ turn. This last month-and-a-half and this next two or three months coming up, this is the voters‘ turn. It‘s time for us to shut up and listen to the voters, and that‘s what I‘m going to do.


And there have to be rules. A culture of Democracy can not flourish without rules.

I think the superdelegates and the DNC committees will be fair.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good. Fuck ClintonCo's strong-arming.
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 12:11 PM by jefferson_dem
I read where many "establishment-type" Democrats have had enough of ClintonCo using them like mere pawns in their political power plays. Payback...will be a beautiful thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I find it hysterical
that the "rules" that people are adamant about defending are rules that were put in place to ensure the primacy of Iowa and New Hampshire - a system that is universally derided here.

And that people think disenfranchising two states is worth doing in order to defend the system they claim to hate.

The mental gymnastics are truly impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Obama's name was no on the MI ballot
I frankly would have no problem with Michigan and Florida being the first two primary states. But the DNC shot them down. So all the candidates (save one) did not campaign.

I think after this cycle, EVERYTHING needs to be looked at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They shot themselves down. The DNC followed the rules scrupulously.
FL and MI thought they did not have to do so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. And Obama chose to take his name off the ballot
nobody made him do it. There was no pledge to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. And the feelings of Floridians is
You don't want our vote, you wont count our vote then you don't need our vote in the GE. People in florida are very disenfranchised with the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Wrong...most here do not feel that way. They don't even care...
and most do not have clue what a delegate is. Even with the media ripping the DNC apart...most simply pay no attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. speak for yourself
I damn care..........many people here care....and yes in the GE it will show up in the results.........

the GOP'ers wanted our votes in the primary ..they ribbed us....teased us... and told us that at least our votes would count in their party system.........don't you remember that?.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. No. It was a Democrat who introduced the bill. It was Dems who pushed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. I know this...........I live here also
Our votes should count.....I know support Obama..can tell from your posts........tell me......what if he had won in FL..........would you still feel the same way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Yes. I would. I supported no one until Hillary starting pushing..
for the FL delegates. I have said so very often. We voted Obama, we support him now. But we were not that adamant until about a week and half before the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
satyr9us Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. On Day One
The horse race is the horse race. What I want to know, irrespective of who wins:

What are they going to be up to on day one?


Let's make our democracy more democratic-- let's all play a role in setting the agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #51
60. On Day One, Obama will be meeting with generals to remove the troops from Iraq.
Hillary will supposedly do the same thing, though she supports reducing troop levels while
leaving bases on the ground until 2013.

If you want your vote counted, then you should be up for playing by the DNC rules by now.
Just hold another election, one in which both candidates are allowed to meet with the public.

We can all live with the results from those elections.
It's fair, and it's something Floridians should be willing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
55.  Name them. I don't care. The "dem leadership" of this state
screwed up and is now trying to blame the DNC and Dean.

They can take a flying leap. They're a bunch of political whores with a bad case of Stockholm syndrome when it comes to the Republican powers here in FL.

They played along and are now trying to screw real democrats in Florida yet again.

The Dem Leadership in FL are nothing but Republican shills in my book.

Who the hell puts up McBride over Reno?

Who the hell bares their collective necks on a repeated basis the powers that be?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. With a 50% school drop out rate it's no wonder people in Florida are clueless about delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. Well, heck, they are still fighting the teaching of evolution in science class.
And they appear to be making inroads. Teachers are afraid to teach it. They are afraid of the backlash. It's really scary.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/1832

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
56. not agreeing with a poll I saw
Poll , think conducted by the Orlando Newspaper. Said 20 percent of independents were less likely to vote Democratic in the GE because of the DNC actions. The piece was later published on the Nation's website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PermanentRevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I don't feel that
I'm definitely not sitting home in November, and I don't know anyone else who's planning to over the primary mess, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. Oh the irony, if they had waited one week they would both be VERY influential
:rofl: That's hysterical my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
47. Yeah, it doesn't make sense
except if they had a plan to screw the DNC and to help the dlc candidate. Am I missing something from all these backroom shenanigans from wanting an earlier primary that couldn't wait for Super Tues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. If Clinton was so worried about FL and MI
Why not advocate on their behalf BEFORE the election, when the penalties were put in place, rather than now - when it smacks of craven opportunism? She had pleanty of time to argue about the unfairness of the rules, of IA and NH, etc. The fact that she didn't, and in fact supported the DNC in this, is the key point here.

As an Obama supporter I would be glad to see a change in the way Primaries are done. I think it is good to feature a few states first, in order for lesser known candidates to make an appeal to voters directly, but I would favor rotating the first states in a lottery system of some kind. But the time to decide these things is in 2009, not DURING the Primary season.

Talk about mental gymnastics - Hillary supporters can't really be buying into this spin and after the fact rule changing!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
57. 'Universally derided'?
Not so.

Personally I see the start of the campaign season occurring in small states as being a good thing; it levels the playing field. If large states like, say, Florida are the earliest primary contests...it becomes al about whoever has the most money. In places like Iowa and New Hampshire, actually connecting with voters in person is far more important, and it enables candidates who may not enjoy the sort of fundraising advantages of a Senator Clinton to put themselves and their ideas before voters. This is a good thing, I'd say, especially as the rest of the country is watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bill Nelson says "absolutely not" to do-over.
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 12:27 PM by madfloridian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Bill Nelson is a right wing Democrat whose opinion I hold in very little regard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. A do-over would be the best of the fair choices...
How and who would pay for it is another question.

If this does go all the way to a credentials committee, can you imagine a process similar to seating a jury for a trial? Would each side need to agree on each member who would be making the judgment? Or would some members simply get appointed?

Geez, what a mess that could be!

Thanks for the excellent post Mad; who needs the news when I can read this stuff on DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Another question besides how and who pays is who will be the
possible choices. Will the ones who have dropped out be included? Will there be some way to factor in who may have changed their minds since the original primary - changed votes due to drop outs and the "I want my vote to go to a winner" mindset?

Personally, I am against a do-over of any sort. I knew when I went to the polling place that it wouldn't count, but I went because of the property tax amendment (FLA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. You are right. A lot of the votes were because of the tax amendment.
It got the Republicans out, and they are planning a gay marriage amendment on the ballot in November. Wonder if it will work this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. nelson? the little fascist from Florida? The man who supported
invading Polan... i mean Iraq?

The man who as recently as last September voted in-line with Dick Cheney and the various administration criminals to OPPOSE even limited redeployment? That Bill Nelson?

Sounds like a clinton supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Nelson is wrong for not having another re-do on a primary
I don't know what his reasons are other then I suspect it's too expensive. JMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thepricebreaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sharpton also sent a letter to the DNC a few days ago against seating them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Well, I am not sure what he means. I saw a video of Sharpton at Newshounds.
He sounds like he might sue the DNC, and he does not sound that happy with them either. Will find the post and put the link here if I can stay online long enough to do it. Cable problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Brave New Films has made a video about the conflict
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 12:56 PM by madfloridian
between Sharpton and Bond. Sounds like Sharpton will sue the DNC over something. I say go ahead, everyone else is.

http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/29330-sharpton-threatens-action-against-dnc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Clintons Are Ruthless, Unethical Politicians
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 12:29 PM by From The Left
They will rob, cheat and steal to get back to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. That's because Ruth is in the Obama camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
49. And Billary Prays to Her!
Next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good, rules are rule, but Obama is still ahead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Thanks for that. I had missed it.
Been offline most of 24 hours with cable problems. Makes one realize just how sorry the TV really is. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. K & R
Great work mad :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Viva Howard Dean !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Stay tough Howard. The Clintons do not own the Democratic Party.
They should not be allowed to bend the rules (which Hillary agreed to) for Hillary's benefit. This is a glaring example of why I do not support her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. I am from Michigan. We were told then that the primary was meaningless
It should remain that way or there should be a revote when we are not being told that it is meaningless, PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. can't change the rules after the game is played, Clintonistas!
I think most Clinton supporters would agree with this, even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Somebody tell Big Eddie that Big Bill Nelson won't allow a do-over
I finally had to turn him off because he is just not up to date. He has said do-over at least 20 times in just a few minutes.

The state leaders do not want a do-over.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/1817
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
28. the clinton's don't like having to play by the rules...
tough luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
31. Levin and Nelson say no do-overs.
http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_stump/archive/2008/02/13/levin-and-nelson-no-revotes.aspx

"Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) dismissed the possibility in interviews on Tuesday. Levin and Nelson said caucuses would effectively void the primaries in each of their states, and are pushing to have their delegates receive full voting power at the convention.

“You can’t undo an election with a caucus, especially one where 1.75 million Florida Democrats voted,” said Nelson, who filed an unsuccessful lawsuit last year seeking to overturn the national party’s decision to strip Florida of its delegates.

Levin had similar thoughts. “It would not be practical or fair to hold a caucus,” Levin said. “You’ve got 600,000 people who voted. You can’t just throw out the votes of 600,000 people.” Levin said the state will appeal to have its delegates restored by the party convention’s credentials committee this summer....

Asked about the fact that Clinton appeared on the Michigan ballot and Obama did not, Levin noted that it was Obama’s choice to withdraw his name.

“I was disappointed that he did,” Levin said."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. So these senators believe they should make their own rules, screw them
They also both voted for the IWR. Typical of Senators who don't want accountability, because the IWR effectively invalidated the war powers act, which allowed effectively removed oversight of Congress over the executive branch

Good work boys


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. Well, there goes Carl Levin as a potential Sec Def under Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. I would say so.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #52
64. There goes Obama's election if Michigan votes Repug
Which will happen if the Michigan delegates are not seated and the voters are disenfranchised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. You can't change the rules after the game is played.
What part of unfair don't people understand? Many voters assumed - because of the arrangement - their votes wouldn't count and so they stayed home. I suspect Obama would have won Michigan if he had campaigned there. Probably not Florida, but he would have made a better showing. The name "Clinton" is well known. The other candidates were not. For all we know, John Edwards might have won Michigan with his populist message. Unless they want to lose thousands of Democratic Party members, they will not pull a stunt like an after-the-fact rules change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Speaking of changing the rules
It seems to me Obama is trying to change the rules on the S.D. and influence or sway them. That's why I'm voting for Hillary and not Obama, among other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I think he's suggesting they vote for the person with the most support
from the voters. Seems to me that could be either candidate. Or if Hillary's ahead do you want your state delegates voting for Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. You misunderstand what he means.
He means let the voters have their say first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilyWondr Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. They did
In September 2007 when their state legislature decided to move their primary even though they knew their delegates being stripped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. He is not changing the rules only making an appeal for their votes...
And they both are doing this. There is an obvious difference. Making a case about how someone should vote is a completely different thing from saying what votes count after the election already happened. If Obama were saying Super Delegate votes shouldn't count after they had already voted within the rules... then you would have an argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #34
50. It is not against the rules to try to convince SDs to vote for a particular candidate
Why would it be against the rules to try to sway SD votes? SDs vote however they choose. Of course candidates are going to try to get them to choose to vote for them. That's what campaigning is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
45. Well, I expressed my views to them. Here is the link if anyone else wants to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
48. No matter what the credentials committee decides, the loser can take the matter to the floor
and it will be at the convention floor that the delegates will decide whether to sit or not the FL and MI delegations. If Obama has a majority of the delegates, however slim, he can control the final outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. Think Obama might want to not ignore Mich come
November.It's only 17 electoral votes. No big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
59. Continue to disenfranchise a large state like Florida
and watch it fall on the Republican column in November. At which point I'll either be repeating "I told you so" or laughing my butt off.

Since no one campaigned in FL, it was an even playing field. I don't see the problem with allowing their delegates into the convention. MI is another story since only Hillary was on the ballot. Maybe they should hold another primary, but who would pay for it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #59
61.  The DNC wants Florida to vote. They're not interested in disenfranchising anyone.
Hillary campaigned in Florida, Obama did not.

The DNC wants a fair election, one in which both parties get to canvas the state for votes.
Florida can still have that election, but it refuses to do so.

There's nothing funny about the prospect of Florida going republican, unless you are a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Hillary didn't campaign in Florida
Obama did however. He ran ads and Hillary did not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
62. Excellent News! I would totally loose my faith in the DNC if it backs down now
after it is too late for fair and "valid" voting to have taken place on those fake primary days. If they (MI and FL) want to be counted they need to re-primary or re-caucus as required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC