Story, Resurrected
The Atlantic trumps GQ
By Megan Garber
Fri 15 Feb 2008 11:51 AM
Last September, GQ killed a piece by Atlantic senior editor Josh Green that detailed—and, in turns out, foreshadowed—internal struggles in Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The move caused a scandal, and rightfully so: the piece was axed because, allegedly, the Clinton campaign had threatened to withhold a cover story with Bill Clinton (naming the former president its “Man of the Year”) if GQ ran the critical piece.
In the current issue of The Atlantic, that story—pumped up with fresh reporting and more current detail—has been resurrected. And, in that, it has amounted to a victory for rigorous journalism (Clinton, campaign-as-troubled) over fawning puff pieces (Clinton, Bill-as-demigod)—and for journalistic interests over commercial ones.
..............
Instead of appearing last fall, when a lot of voters were still only devoting partial attention to the election, and fluctuations in the polls didn’t mean much, Green’s story has come out at the most critical juncture of the primaries, with Barack Obama one or two big states away from sewing up the nomination. And instead of appearing in a glossy men’s fashion magazine, it’s running in one of the country’s most respected highbrow publications.
Nice work, Team Clinton.http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/story_resurrected.php*************************
How Hillary's campaign managed itself into a ditch—and how it might get itself outby Joshua Green
Inside the Clinton Shake-Up Like so much involving Hillary Clinton, Sunday’s departure of her campaign manager, Patti Solis Doyle, has gotten tons of attention, but its larger significance has been somewhat misunderstood. I’ve spent a fair amount of time over the last two years reporting on “Hillaryland,” as Clinton’s inner circle is known, for pieces like this one and this one, and also, infamously, for one that did not run when GQ magazine opted to kill it after learning of the Clinton campaign’s displeasure (full story here). The latter piece focused on the inner workings of Clinton’s presidential campaign and Solis Doyle’s controversial role in it, and I’ll draw on what I learned then to try to add perspective to recent happenings.
For the many people in and around Washington who obsess over the latest machinations in Hillaryland, the firing of Solis Doyle—and she was fired, several insiders confirm—is a big deal, but for reasons somewhat different from what the media coverage has suggested. Her title of “campaign manager” implies a loftier role than the one she actually played. She is the furthest thing from a Rove-like strategic genius (Mark Penn inhabits that role for Hillary), so her leaving doesn’t signify an impending change of strategy, as some reports seem to assume. Rather, Solis Doyle, who began as Clinton’s personal scheduler in 1991 (and who, as it happens, coined the term “Hillaryland”) was Clinton’s alter ego and was installed in the job specifically for that reason. Her performance in Clinton’s past races and especially in this one reflects all the good and the bad that the alter-ego designation carries. I’ve always felt that the most revealing thing about Solis Doyle is her oft-repeated line: “When I’m speaking, Hillary is speaking.” It is revealing both because it is true and because it conveys—and even flaunts—an arrogance that I think is the key to understanding all that has gone wrong for the Clinton campaign.
Such arrogance led directly to the idea that Clinton could simply project an air of inevitability and be assured her party’s nomination. If she wins—as she very well might—it will be in spite of her original approach. As one former Clinton staffer put it to me last spring: “There was an assumption that if you were a major donor and wanted to be an ambassador, go to state dinners with the queen—unless you were an outright fool, you were going to go with Hillary, whether you liked her or not. The attitude was ‘Where else are they going to go?’”
It’s important to emphasize that Solis Doyle was not the architect of the Clinton strategy. It was devised and agreed to by many of the campaign’s top staffers, and the candidate herself signed off on it. But in all my reporting and personal experience with the campaign, Solis Doyle probably embodied it more than anyone else. It’s not unfair that she lost her job; but it is unfair that no other senior staffers appear to be in danger of losing theirs.
more at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200802u/patti-solis-doyle
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
