Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary interviewed by NYMag about the media bias during the primaries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:28 AM
Original message
Hillary interviewed by NYMag about the media bias during the primaries
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 10:28 AM by sueragingroz
It's an interesting read and I think that it's recent enough to merit posting here:

http://nymag.com/news/politics/powergrid/44211/?imw=Y

An excerpt from the article follows but I suggest that you read the whole thing.


That the campaign exaggerates its degree of outrage, and Hillary her victimhood, in order to gain a tactical advantage is obvious. But that doesn’t mean their critique is meritless—quite the contrary. The more interesting question, however, is what role each campaign has had in fostering a media dynamic that has clearly favored Obama and plainly damaged Clinton. And also whether that dynamic will come back to bite Obama if he’s the Democratic nominee.



It’s worth pointing out, to begin with, that the Clinton forces are hardly alone in noting the disparity. “Both of them have gotten an enormous amount of play,” says Marion Just, a political scientist at Wellesley who has made a systematic study of the coverage of the race. “But the coverage of Hillary has been primarily negative, while the coverage of Obama has been so positive that you have to call him, though I really hate this term, a media darling.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, agree
I'm an Obama supporter at the moment but I'd be the first to acknowledge that the media is biased. This morning was all about how Hillary is going negative against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. it will come back to bite him. The higher they put you the farther you fall.
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 10:40 AM by kikiek
If anyone knows this it is the media. I think Obama is in for a very hard landing. And the way he is feeding the Hillary frenzy he is creating some very bitter Hillary supporters. Those combined will haunt him, and could very well cost him should he win the nomination. Great article I hope everyone actually reads it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. absolutely
In January I was authentically on the fence. Now I've become an ardent Hillary supporter. For two reasons:

1) I learned a lot more about Hillary and started to look beyond the meme and also because

2) I learned a lot more about Obama and started to look beyond the meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I know if the GE were tomorrow and he was the nominee I
could not support him. I am sick of him and his better than thou attitude. He has attacked her consistently and sometimes Bill but if she or they try to fight back they are pounded by the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Me too. I am hoping Hillary wins or that I soften my attitude towards him. Best bet is Hillary tho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. If Obama gets the nom the media will turn on him
with a frenzy that will make the swiftboaters look like a bunch of Sunday School teachers. It's going to be brutal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. It worked for Bush and the neo-cons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick & rec for Obama, "the media darling"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. I Believe Fox May Skew Anti-Hillary
And some MSNBC hosts/pundits don't hide their dislike for her, you do have to chalk a lot of the seemingly negative coverage to the fact there have been a lot more positives for the Obama campaign than for hers. No reason to spin the truth, it is what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. This was very interesting, the jist of which most Hillary supporters
are very much aware of. The problem is that most voters are just not readers. The hear only the sound bytes. Hillary's supporters need to invent new sound bytes for her and try to overpower the obamites intentional slander.

Uniter my ass! This man is the most divisive mistake to ever hit the democratic party. Because we see the hypocracy, lies and sexism, and yes, reverse racism, simply says to us that this man is a charlatan. This in a nutshell is why so many hill supporters declare not only their immunity to his supposed charm, but declare they will not support him if he wins the nomination.

What is really bothering me now, is the possibity that he is a republican in disguise, and the combined forces of deluded democrats and in-the-know republican manipulation could put us in another eight years of scary shit that will make the Bush administration look tame by comparison.

Yes, I am that scared of Glitterbama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I wouldn't put anything past
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!"
Should Obama get the nomination, he and his followers will soon discover they're not in Kansas anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. yeah the media is biased. I am an Obama supporter but even I can see it.
hopefully it will help get him to the nomination...i know that seems wrong but im hoping for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Its always been this way for the Clintons
The right wing created a Hillary hater demographic that has an appetite for slander about the Clintons. The media is always happy to tell those people what they want to hear. Its good for ratings.

There's also resentment among major media figures because their egos were hurt when the couldn't destroy the Clintons before. They are out to get her again and they get away with it. So few journalists, like the one who wrote the article above, will point out the hypocrisy. The right wing managed to create an unwritten rule that its OK to spread hatred and lies about the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hillary courted the wingnut media and they set her up good (including Murdoch and Sciafe)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. . “But the coverage of Hillary has been primarily negative," This a reseached conclusiong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. Media...
Please. For the past three years we have been continually bombarded by the media with the message that Hillary was the inevitable nominee. If the emphasis has shifted a bit toward Obama now, she hardly has cause to complain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC