Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas Papers Endorse Obama – 5 majors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:14 PM
Original message
Texas Papers Endorse Obama – 5 majors
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 05:17 PM by autorank

POLITEX


http://startelegram.typepad.com/politex/2008/02/star-telegram-o.html


Texas papers back Obama and (mostly) McCain

Presidential endorsements are out from the five biggest Texas newspapers. Barack Obama had a clean sweep on the Democratic side. It was also a good day for John McCain. (Note: The Morning News announced their endorsements back in December, well before Mike Huckabee's campaign stalled. Politicos will likely be debating whether the paper's op/ed board would have chosen differently had they waited until this week)

Star-Telegram: Obama & McCain

The rest:

Austin: Obama & McCain

Dallas: Obama & Huckabee

Houston: Obama & McCain

San Antonio: Obama & McCain


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Moh96 Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. thank you for that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Clean sweep. We'll see how they count the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama should get a large bunch of delegates from TX
even if he marginally loses to HRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Is TX proportional?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Texas has a weird system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Thanks. That is diffdrent, interesting too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. all RW rag papers....why doesn't that send up any red flags? don't ya'll get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Endorsements
These papers all endorsed Bush for president in 2004. There were only two papers who endorsed Kerry - the Waco Tribune and the Crawford Lone Star Iconoclast. I don't know about RW rags. The Dallas paper ran the story about Edmonds, a violation of the gag order to not discuss that story (just recently), and the Ft Worth paper ran the story about the "missing nukes" - a scathing critique by a former USAF officer saying there were all sorts of things wrong with that event.

Don't get me wrong, I don't have much faith in any papers. Wasn't it the NYT that sat on the Oct 2004 story of presidential ordered wire tapping well into 2005, a story that would have won Kerry the election (based on the initial reaction to that). And the Washington Post is laughingly and accurately called the Penta Post for their stenographic efforts in behalf of the administration.

They're all right wing to varying degrees (with some exceptions like the McClatchy papers).

The post just reports what's happening there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. The NYT is the worst of all..
but, all these endorsements might generate some excitement that otherwise might not be noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nominated.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. It's what's happening;)
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 07:54 PM by autorank
Virginia's primary had 950,000 voters this year. It had 450,000 in 2004, which was a hot primary.

Who were the extras? Well, lets start with all the people in this fine state who are fed up with a timid Democratic Party and add the large urban votes in Richmond and Tidewater, where many of the 200,000 disenfranchised ex felons live, largely black and 90% non violent crimes, but denied the vote. Their family and friends know that two Democratic governors could have, by fiat, restored voting rights to these individuals who have done their time and paid their debt.

For these folks, Obama's candidacy was a vehicle of pay back to the tepid faction of the party

- look what you could have if you really represented us, spoke for us, cared!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hey
Hiddey ho,

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm impressed by the momentum behind this effort.
I think even the powers that be have to be impressed with Obama's performance since, by my understanding, he's the guy behind himself;)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Spectacular!
Thanks for posting this, Mike! It appears the big mo remains with Barack.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. 50% - 48% Clinton - Obama in Texas but that's a rolling average.
Lots of heads exploding after the big three. PA is the wild card. Watch how he does in the middle of the state. That will tell a lot. Maybe some corks popping in your neighborhood;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's happening all over Texas. Hillary is not liked here.
She may win the valley. She may win a large number of sparsely populated, largely white counties in west, north, and east Texas, but she'll lose the big cities and the big senatorial districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. The Rove plan here...get the knuckle draggers to crosover vote in the OPEN Primary for......
the weakest candidate.....and they will NOT be there for Obama in November.....GET IT YET?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Nonsense. Utter nonsense.
Save it for someone who doesn't know and understand Texas Politics better than you ever will. I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. keep telling yourself that....I will remember you and hit you back with an "I told ya so"
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 08:45 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. No, you won't, because you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.
But you already know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. Kick! Real News.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC