JackRiddler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:26 PM
Original message |
The "plagiarism" debate in regard to politics is kind of ridiculous. |
|
I wish the only problem with politicians was that they all draw from the same tired body of rhetoric. When was the last time you mistook one for Shakespeare - himself an incorrigible plagiarist?
make no mistake god bless hope and change for our children hate our freedoms
new ideas keep us safe create jobs help you help yourself end partisan politics brush your teeth
trust the maverick trust experience get things done outside the beltway unite don't polarize my plan
resolve to flipflop tax and spend those who serve work for you war and peace secure prosperity
i've heard your message old glory
|
chimpymustgo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
1. LOL. I'd rather hear Obama say something with some substance, rather more platitudes |
|
whether he "borrowed" them from someone else, or not.
|
Windy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. I've listened to Hillarys stump speech and Obamas... where is the "substance" in Hillary's stump? |
|
There is none! Both candidates make campaign promises. There is no substance in either of their speeches. This argument is pure bunk. Hillary hopes that by repeating this claim over and over, that Barack is all words and no substance, will cause the weak minded to believe that its actually true when there is no evidence that her stump is any different than his!
It appears to be working with some of you!
You may want to actually listen to both of their stump speeches for a change!
|
Raven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Thank you. I was trying to say this very thing in an earlier post. |
|
You have said it much better. This whole debate/discussion is ridiculous. And I think William S. stole from Marlow and on and on and on...
|
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:30 PM
Original message |
Essentially I agree with you, however... |
|
There is a real element of "Live by the pen, Die by the pen" at play in this. So much of the positive media buzz about Obama has centered on his dazzling oratory skills, about his uplifting and powerful speeches and his amazing way with words, that there is almost an inevitable reverse focus now on whether Obama can take full credit for those speeches, and for those words, as his own.
It's the other side of the coin. Obama has run his campaign less on his record of accomplishments (with the notable but ironic exception of his powerful 2002 speech against pending war with Iraq) than on his ability to inspire, and his ability to lead and unify America through his ability to inspire with words. Therefor the mechanics of how Obama inspires with words almost inevitably become newsworthy to a media that was mesmerized by them in the first place.
|
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
3. But Obama's supposed to be different |
|
that's his whole thing, he's not just another phony politician.
|
JackRiddler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. And what's Clinton's "thing"? Please. |
Enrique
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. imo, her thing is Bill Clinton's presidency |
mrreowwr_kittty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Seriously. The level of naivete in this place is astounding. |
|
I honestly think some Dems like losing. It's like a badge of honor or something. They can't even contemplate that we have a candidate who is energizing a lethargic electorate, for once. Can't have that! My heavens no! They want the candidate who drones on and on about policy details, like I'm watching Clinton do on CSPAN right now.
|
JackRiddler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Truth to tell, I want the one who drones on about policy details, too... |
mrreowwr_kittty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Get elected now. Drone afterwards. nt |
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Kick for side by side comparisons with the other thread |
|
Who is plagerising who here. lol?
|
JackRiddler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Seriously: Which other thread do you mean? |
|
If someone else did the same thing, they are helping to illustrate the same point.
No, wait.
I'm gonna ruin them for ripping me off!!!
|
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
JackRiddler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-18-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Hmmm... the plagiarism of my plagiarism post is getting more replies. |
taterguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
JackRiddler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. I never thought otherwise, I had the Bard as my teacher nt |
taterguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. So that makes you what? About 500 years old? |
|
What's the secret to your longevity?
|
JackRiddler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. No, he has a secret way of communicating with me through time. |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 06:00 PM by JackRiddler
He wrote words on paper.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:38 AM
Response to Original message |