Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats may regret emphasizing the "creepy" memes about Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:34 AM
Original message
Democrats may regret emphasizing the "creepy" memes about Obama
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 11:43 AM by Armstead
It's one thing to disagree with or dislike Obama.

However, if he gets the nomination, Democrats could regret the endless repetition of words and images that portray him and his supporters as creepy. All of the talk about him being Messianic and his supporters as Cultlike and the implications that his campaign has some quasi-mystical dimension to it.

It is giving the GOP a pre-fab basis for their own campaign if Obama wins.

Obama is basically a very successful politician. No more no less. He is doing exactly what any politician would love to accomplish -- run a campaign that generates strong support among a wide range of people. And, yes, one that is inspiring people.

In fact, he is basically doing what Bill Clinton did in 1992.

His public image is still in the process of being formed. So far, according to the polls, people generally have a very good impression of him.

But if Democrats keep trying to portray him as a weird, empty, exotic cult leader, we will be handing the GOP the gun that could shoot us in the foot.

I'm not suggesting that no one should criticize him.

However, I would just suggest that Democrats tone down the efforts to turn his positive qualities into a liability and create an image of him as a creepy weirdo leading a cult of creepy weirdos. It could create unwanted consequences in the General Election.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Will the Obamaniacs regret their allegations of racism against the Clintons
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 11:52 AM by Tarc
if she wins? Along with the numerous other slurs and putdowns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Probably
I realize there's a slight double standard in my OP. However, the difference is that Hillary is already a familiar figure, while Obama's ultimate image is still being created.

In reality, the Republicans are not likely to create a new image of Hillary based of the objections of Democrats to her candidacy. Especially objections from "the left."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
griffi94 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. don't be silly
it's not like we'll actually take back the white house.....in the end we'll find some way to blow it.....that's one of the reasons im a democrat.....there's a real sense of crusading in trying to do the right thing and never being able to pull it off.lol......in an election year when everything favors us....from the war to the economy to the national mood......at the last possible second we'll snatch defeat from the jaws of victory....like in 2000.....not trying to be a killjoy.....just pointing out the obvious.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. Defeat Has Already Been Snatched from the Jaws of Victory
We are running the weakest candidates in living memory. They are running McCain, whom the media totally adores.
McCain already ties us or beats us, and the Mighty Slime Machine hasn't even started to swiftboat our candidate yet.

I hope we win somehow, but I don't see how it can happen now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
griffi94 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. well for whatever it's worth
after we lose again we can all rally around the thought that 2012 will be our year.....then in 2011 we can fragment again and start the whole thing all over....i take some comfort in the thought that we'll add to our congressional majority....
we're already dead as far as the white house goes....i knew as soon as the repubs nominated mccain.....any other candidate from them would have been crushed by either of our remaining candidates.....alas it was not to be....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. McCain Could Have Coat-Tails
I would not take our "majority" in Congress for granted either.
Lieberman will probably defect to the Repigs officially,
now that he is openly endorsing their candidate.
We are unlikely to pick up seats in the face of a resounding defeat at the top of the ticket.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. They are trying to destroy him.
All of these attacks are intended to wreck his credibility and make him unelectable. This is scorched-earth campaigning. Thankfully, people are not buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. "The cult of Obama" is applicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Please explain why it is more "cultlike" than any otehr campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. It's not
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 12:16 PM by high density
Many of these "cult" whiners are annoyed to see people gravitating toward Obama because they can't understand why. I believe their reasoning is that Clinton is so great, how could somebody not choose her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama is just another Axlerod "hope & change" franchise holder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That may be true
But Axlerod is not some mysterious overlord from the depths of Hades.

He's a political stretegist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. So much for "transformative". The whole thing is a cheap campaign strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. No it's a successful campaign strategy
And isn't having a successful campaign strategy sort of important in politics?

Yes, governing is the real point. But to govern you have to get there first. And I'm not sure that trying to knock the legs out from under successful campaign strategies is the way for Democrats to take back power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. It's the worst kind of "I'll give you a pony" campaign strategy.
The legs are going to get knocked off of it, but it won't be the Dems fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. How is he giving any more of a pony than Hillary?
He's not making any promises that Hillary isn't. He's just been better at it.

Should both candidates run on a platform of "Elect me but it won't make any difference because the system will defeat you anyway?"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Obama "vote for me, I've employed the better pony salesman".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. I guess you are saying you're against success?
IMO the Democratic Party needs an injection of good salesmanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I reject the use of the message of "hope" to sell a defective product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. You'd be praising it if your candidate had chosen to campaign this way
It's like we're supposed to fault a candidate for being successful and getting votes... Come on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Bullshit. You have no idea what I would do, and it sure as shit wouldn't
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 12:23 PM by The_Casual_Observer
be to buy into a lousy stupid synthetic message like that. You've as much as admitted that the whole thing is a crock, yet, it's okay, because he can win on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. It's a successful marketing campaign and you are kneecapping him for it
Marketing is a part of how political races are won these days. If it helps somebody with his platform win over some red state folks, I'm all for it. It sure as hell beats Hillary Clinton's scorched earth strategy that inflames other Democrats and brings zero people in from the opposing side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. It didn't take long for "transformation/brighter day" to be reduced to
a marketing ploy that I ought to shut up about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. Give me a break.
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 01:13 PM by high density
You know that's not what I meant. What a nasty fucking response. I give up trying to reason with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. And if Hillary wins, the same holds true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Please see my Post 4 for a response.
P.S. Love that little running dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. If Clinton doesn't win the nomination
Will they even really care if Obama is defeated?

It seems to me that the election only "counts" for them if Clinton is the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Who is "they?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. Clinton. Both of them. Who will be co-presidents, if elected. (at least Bill thinks so)
Sorry, I guess that was too nuanced. (or just stupid on my part. :P)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. People haven't been pushing the racism issue
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 12:09 PM by Levgreee
I don't think anyone (or hardly anyone) is trying to paint Hillary as racist. At the worst, that she made insensitive comments, but that does not make a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Indeed...
The Repubs are letting the Democrats create the narrative for the general election. And we are obliging them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. I agree, and I think that Obama supporters should drop the crap about Hillary, too.
There's a thread up now suggesting that "we" purge the Democratic Party of the Clintons and anyone else perceived as less than perfect. This is the kind of crap that hands Republicans victories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. more to that point... its what the GOP does internally.
the Big Tent of the Democratic Party is getting smaller by the day with this kind of stuff.

That said, you're point (and the OP) are valid, good and true. We need a return to civility in this primary, and a return of civility to the GE as well.

That has to start right here, at the root of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. I agree 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. When will Obama's surrogates...
apologize for their playing the race card against the Clinton's?
Will Michelle do the same since she deliberately took Bill Clinton's fairytale comment out of context?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I didn't think that was approriate either.
At least not until Bill Clinton's idiotic and racist Jesse Jackson remark after Obama won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. One could say that he was fighting back against them.
Especially Michelle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Yes, by playing that good ole Lee Atwater perfected "Southern Strategy"
All Bubba needed in addition to two thuggish guys leaning on his Limo, was mirrored sunglasses to make "the scene complete." <cue "The Dukes of Hazzard Theme Song.">
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Yes, it's sort of disingenuous of people to spin that into "See! Michelle's not patriotic" B.S.
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 12:22 PM by ShortnFiery
Gee, her husband has VASTLY exceeded all expectations ... don't you think that we could cut her a little slack on the use of hyperbole?

Does anyone TRULY believe that Michelle Obama does NOT love Our Country? Now, really - Does anyone truly believe such *bunk?*

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's a marketing tool of his invention. NOW you want to pull it back?
Those bad, evil boomers, that hope thing with no explaination, the crowds of "yes we can" chanting the yes of what? The exclusivity of his generational war games.

Don't blame us. Your guy and his pals though this one up by themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. True. Obama began this crap.
He has only himself to blame when it backfires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. The Clintons and their beloved DLC have perfected the art of "divide and conquer" politics.
You know that, don't you? ... but Uncle KKKarl says to "hit them in their strong spot (integrity)."

Bravo, Good old boy, Mark Penn is proving himself up to the task of FILTHY campaign managing. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. Many boomers get his point.
I'm one of those bad evil boomers myself. (And I was originally an Edwards supporter, and still would be if only....)

I don't see it as generational war. Rather it's the fact that politics has been stuck in one destructive position since....well, at least the late 1970's.

We need a fresh perspective. I'm not advocating -- nor is Obama -- that everyone over 50 be tossed in the wastebasket. But we do need some new input, that offers at least the possibility of the gridlock and the steamroller of right-wing corporate conservatism that we've been trapped by for several decades.

And how is "Yes We Can" any more empty that Hillary's chants at rallies?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. clintons supporters are about to become targets of thier own filthy attacks
some karmic justice in there..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. And may I be the first to say, with a few very notable exceptions ...
it couldn't happen to a NICER clutch of people. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
43. So its ok for Democrats to reinforce the RW memes about Clinton?
This post is a perfect example of the meme you seek to debunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Depends on the memes...or more accurately the criticisms
Ppersonal attacks on Hillary based on the crap that Rush spews out shouldn't be reinforced by Democrats either.

But differences on issues are not just memes.And they aren't right-wing.

I'm not saying Obama should be immune from criticism on his positions -- and yes he does have positions and proposals. Nor should Clinton be immune to that.

My point is that there is too much creepy imagery that is wrongly being used against Obama by Democrats that could have blowback come the General Election.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
49. I agree -- That kind of talk is over the top and not helping our cause at all
I have criticized Obama a number of times myself. But our criticisms should stick to tangible issues of policy and actions, not emotionally laden stuff that Republicans can make use of in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
50. Great article in NYT on Sunday on some of this.
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 01:37 PM by cbayer
It talked alot about charisma, while sometimes using the phrase "cult of personality". I think charisma applies in this case and I agree that we should find a less loaded word than cult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. yes. Charisma is a good thing. So is enthusiasm of his supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
51. Thanks for posting this message.
I'm mostly a lurker on DU, but I've been struck -- and bewildered -- by the tone of the debate here. I voted for Obama in California, but I'd be perfectly happy to vote for Clinton in November if she wins. I don't understand what the source of all the bitterness I've read here is. We have two good choices. There's no reason to demonize either of them. And there is a very good reason to refrain from personal attacks or scorched earth tactics: one of these two has to face McCain in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC