Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Proof Obama is opposed to real health care reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:54 PM
Original message
Proof Obama is opposed to real health care reform
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 01:40 PM by OzarkDem
"But there are still certain things that make me really, really nervous about Obama. At the top of that list is the health care debate, where I think he's just wrong about the importance of universality, and where he's employed Harry and Louise-style tactics to argue against Clinton's plan. My concerns shifted into overdrive, though, when I noticed that the Obama campaign is now using Rep. Jim Cooper as a spokesperson/surrogate on health care.

I was part of the Clinton White House team on the health care reform issue in 1993/94, and no Democrat did more to destroy our chances in that fight than Jim Cooper. We had laid down a marker very early that we thought universal coverage was the most essential element to getting a good package, saying we were to happy to negotiate over the details but that universality was our bottom line.

Cooper, a leader of conservative Dems on the health care issue, instead of working with us, came out early and said universality was unimportant, and came out with a bill that did almost nothing in terms of covering the uninsured. He quickly became the leading spokesman on the Dem side for the insurance industry position, and undercut us at every possible opportunity, basically ending any hopes we had for a unified Democratic Party position. I was never so delighted to see a Democrat lose as when he went down in the 1994 GOP tide. "

http://openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yawn-posted already. The rebuttal is better:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Nothing in that rebuttal
but some GOP trash talking about Clinton's first try at health care reform.

Certainly nothing that in any way exonerates Mr. Cooper.

Obama's own words are his worst enemy on this issue. Time and again, he has used the talking points of the private health insurance lobbyists to criticize Clinton's plan and even sabotage his own.

So much of his health care reform talk comes right from the "Harry & Louise" ads. So now we know its not an accident, its deliberate and we know who's writing those speeches for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The old 'kill the messenger' meme. And it IS getting old. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Obama has a poor health care reform plan
he seeks to sideline the issue by using GOP talking points about Clinton's plan, even going so far as to hire the guy who undermined the last effort at reform.

Pretty cut and dried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, and also he once stole my mom's aspirin.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. The problem is both the Clinton plan and the Obama plan suck. So the question
then is who will we better be able to push to a single payer fee for service plan? You know, a plan where we self insure as a country and cut out the middle men, the insurance industry.

From what I've seen of Clinton over the years, she has no use and no respect for the grass roots. She's a power player who only deals from the top down. Since the Insurance industry is at the top of the feeding chain, that's who she works with.

Obama, on the other had, has shown that he's quite comfortable with the grass roots. He worked with the grass roots organizing on the South Side, in Chicago. His campaign is strongly grass roots. I have togo with Obama, if only because I believe we will eventually be able to move his plan to be a lot better, and to use grass roots energy/action to actually get it passed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Not true
Clinton's plan is better because it provides universal coverage and is thus sustainable. This has been discussed many times and not been successfully refuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Senator Kennedy who has done more than anyone on healthcare vouches for him on this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. I prefer to have a choice as to whether to have health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigoblue Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Choosing not to participate in is
refusing to share the responsibility. Do you hate social security, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It also puts the cost of paying for uninsured's care
on those who do buy insurance. Sorry, no free riders for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. No, I don't expect anybody else to pay for me. And honestly I don't mind if
my taxes help pay for others to have health care, if they need it.

But I don't like the way people use health insurance to abdicate responsibility
for taking care of their own health. I've seen a great deal of this: people run
to doctors and the pharmaceutical counter without stopping to figure out
why they're getting sick all the time. I'm not in favor of that, I think it
ends up hurting everybody. I believe the majority of health ills are caused
by crappy diet, pollution, and lifestyle. Many of the cures are worse than
the disease. And most hospitals are dangerous places, unless you have
a life threatening emergency.

I don't like the whole health care industry, period.
I do have strong personal feelings on this whole issue, and they're not even
worth a debate, because they're my own; I'm not trying to convince anybody
else to feel the same way. I just don't like the idea of health insurance
being mandatory, on principle.

I don't like car insurance either. In fact, I don't like insurance in general.
It's a huge scam overall. Scuse my rant.... (I am restraining myself).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. and one last point...
it seems to me that the main resounding message of the medical
industries is this: avoid death at all costs. As if that were an option
for mortals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Proof that Hillary is working with lobbyists on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Keep those facts handy, ProSense. Maybe someone will 'get it'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Both candidates are pro-corporation here. This is a surprise? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Both are opposed to actual reform
as is a substantial segment of the Democratic party.

So long as the corportists hold sway, nothing rational will ever be passed on the health care front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. For a minute there, I thought you had Michelle's pay stubs...
There's big money in big medicine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC