NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:32 PM
Original message |
Clinton needs to win +/- 65% of the remaining states delegates |
|
per MSNBC.
I didnt know her "magic number" was that high.
Not insulting anyone, but that is a HUGE number considering she hasnt won the majority of delegates in the last ten states. Obama is also now making inroads in Texas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Texas is tied. She's ahead by 9 in Ohio. 16 in Pennsylvania according to the latest poll. |
|
I just don't see how she can do it.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Unless Obama COMPLETELY flops in the two debates, and I mean drooling on the podium flop, there's no way she's gonna get those numbers.
Or unless the Rezko thing ends up being way more damaging than anyone suspects.
|
Omega3
(412 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. in order for it to be damaging the MSM has to talk about it.... oh yeah they will , after June |
mckeown1128
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. lol "drooling on the podium flop"..... lol |
|
that is the funniest damn thing I've ever heard. lol :rofl:
|
nomorewhopper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
4. she hasn't won a single "One on One" primary OR caucus against Obama yet |
|
I don't expect that trend to stop anytime soon.
|
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. so she hasnt won since Edwards dropped out? yikes |
MindMatter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's called "Negatives in teh high 40s" |
|
And that is not just among Limbaugh listeners.
Those negatives have been there -- haven't changed a bit in 16 years. I have no idea how they ever thought they could win the Presidency. You cannot get 'er done with negatives that high. The only way a person can escape from negatives in the high 40s is if they are relatively unknown. She has 100% recognition. People made their mind up a decade ago and there can never be enough people changing that opinion for her to get elected.
|
Medusa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. I loved the Clintons right up til this race |
|
and they had the SC race incidents regarding the race-baiting and it's been one dirty campaign ever since. I realize that I wasn't seeing them as they really are for way too long.
|
nomorewhopper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. it was posted here tonight by a different poster and it was a very telling statistic |
|
all of this "we don't do well in caucuses" doesn't hold up when you compare the massive margins of victory by obama over clinton (in primaries and caucuses) since edwards dropped out.
|
Redbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-19-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I thought Russert said 65% in Texas, Ohio, Penn |
|
Overall its 58% but given that Obama will win some states, Clinton would need huge numbers in the three biggies.
|
CorpGovActivist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 02:32 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message |