Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's & Clintons-The 2 Ruling Families Function With A Monarchical Air-By Robert Parry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:07 AM
Original message
Bush's & Clintons-The 2 Ruling Families Function With A Monarchical Air-By Robert Parry
Clintons Plumb Absurd Depths

By Robert Parry
February 19, 2008


Like the Bushes, the Clintons seem to believe they have some special entitlement to the White House, and thus whatever they do to get there is justified. The two ruling families function with a monarchical air that is unique – or foreign – to the American experience.

.....................

But like the Bushes, who bullied their way back into the White House by shutting down vote-counting in Florida in December 2000, the Clintons also seem to view their claim on the presidency as a right. Any serious challenger must be treated as a pretender guilty of the crime of insolence.

............................

In her recent stump speeches, Hillary Clinton has demeaned the power of words to put down Obama, who clearly has an oratorical advantage. She said: “There’s a difference between speeches and solutions, between talk and action. I was raised to believe that actions speak louder than words.”

Responding to that argument in a speech in Milwaukee on Feb. 16, Obama said, “Don’t tell me words don’t matter. ‘I have a dream.’ Just words? ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.’ Just words? ‘We have nothing to fear but fear itself.’ Just words? Just speeches?”

In a way, of course, Clinton is right. Her recent action – dispatching her spokesmen to attack Obama’s character over trivial issues – does speak volumes. It underscores that the Clintons are prepared to sink to any depth and create bitter divisions within the electorate to secure what they regard as their entitlement, the presidency of the United States.

more at:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/021908.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. words are indeed power. read the amancipation proclamation,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't understand this
Bill was president. Hillary has never been president. What about them makes them a "ruling family" over any other presidential family, like the Carters or Reagans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly. It's a pointless article since it looks like Hillary won't win the nomination anyway. I
just wish this anti-dynasty argument had been made just as forcefully back in 1999/2000 when GWB decided to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paperbag_ princess Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. just Bush fatigue
If GWB hadn't run and won after Clinton then the fact that Hillary is running would be a novelty...and it would probably benefit her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, the Obama campaign telling women it's OK to vote for Obama slices into the brain.
And any woman that falls for this demeaning rhetoric sets herself further behind than anything else can in this primary season.

Women do not need an OK to vote for anyone. While others fall all over themselves trying to bash the Clintons, the Obama campaign's audacity of OK creates a genuine division that is perhaps 32,000 feet over the heads of men with their politically-biased pomp based on hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC