Who Agrees? Taylor Marsh v. Stephanie Miller

[Khaotic]

Now that's a showdown I would love to see.

Marsh is FREAKING out on her show about Hillary's slide and she doesn't have a kind word for Obama. From the time she goes on the air until the time she goes off she's reharshing every negative item ever lobbed at Obama. If she was in front of him and had a pair of scissors I think she would have to be stopped by the secret service.

While Stephanie isn't a hardcore Obama supporter, she can smell bullshit when she smells it. I think she would do great against the swill Marsh is throwing around.

It's a cat fight that would be one for the ages.



Thoughts???

[THUNDER HANDS]

1. woah, Taylor Marsh

yeeeesh.

[Big Blue Marble]

2. Taylor Marsh.

Bought and paid for.

[liberalnurse]

4. Oh for Chrissake

like Stephanie Miller isn't a media whore. She is doing whatever gets her a paycheck, content be damn. Here and peer-buddy Schultz. They both lick the boots of MSNBC producers, Matthews and anyone else on TV who will give them air time.

[WolverineDG]

5. Which is why Steph called Tweety

a right-wing tool on air.

dg

[GarbagemanLB]

8. Don't share logic with Hillbots, they can't handle it.

[liberalnurse]

13. Stephanie Miller and Ed Schultz

are parroting O'Riley, Hannity and other right-wing hosts. She and Ed both now are cutting off callers who support Clinton, try to disrupt their train of thought...then use condensending tone with callers then brag at how open and balanced they are...sure, and I'm a Nun.

[Big Blue Marble]

9. You are always so angry.

Her dedication to Hillary's campaign seems more than loyal.

[ronnykmarshall]

3. If you think Stephanie ISN'T ...

as hardcore Obama supporter, I have a bridge to sell you.

[Khaotic]

7. She supports him now

... but that's not the point.

My point isn't to paint her as not taking a position.

The point here is whether DUers would like to see Marsh v. Miller???

Thoughts and how do you think it would go down?

Also ... if you like the idea, how can we make it happen?

[ronnykmarshall]

11. She supports him NOW?

Try since last summer.

And I could give a flying fuck about a Miller v. Marsh duel.

Why should we have two progressives going after each other.

So I guess you still want to continue the Hillary vs. Obama battle. For what?

Yeah, just what we need to split supporters ever FURTHER.

I'm a big fan of Momma, but her show has turned into a three hour ad for Obama.

I'll turn her back on after the convention or if the nomination is settled in a few weeks.

[Khaotic]

14. The negative-ness is beyond our control

In case you missed the memo ... "it's on!"

Hillary's "people" will be diving from the balcony now and swinging with everying including the kitchen sink.

Might as well put the shreeking Marsh in with Miller who will expose her for what she is.

Regardless, I think it would be entertaining.

Another thing ... on the progressive side we listen to each other take cracks at Bush Co. and rethugs and feel we're one big family, but I think this process is good to expose those who back the corporate Dems like Hillary and side w/ the DLC Landos of the party.

Since the atmosphere is hot right now anyway, I think it would be great to get these two together and see which talker gets the best of who.

Can the DLC-Lando talker Marsh take down the more progressive Miller?

I don't know for sure ... I would love to find out.

[GarbagemanLB]

6. Taylor is sexist, plain and simple. Hillary has a vagina and shares some of her viewpoints, so she'l

l obviously be for her rather than the more electable candidate, Obama.

[MadBadger]

10. I think the commenters on Taylor Marsh give Hillaryis44 a run ofr their money

http://taylormarsh.com/comments.php?postID=27055

though they are probably a lot of the same people.

[Khaotic]

12. Talk about a cult

... those people on Marsh's site are crazed!