Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question: It seems like Hillary does BETTER when she stays away from attack ads...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:11 PM
Original message
Question: It seems like Hillary does BETTER when she stays away from attack ads...
and focuses on the positives of her campaign as opposed to the negatives of Obama.
With that in mind, why is she going hard negative? I'd think that, with her campaign in a tight spot, she'd want to AVOID the strategy that has hurt her up to this point, and stick with the one that has gotten her actual results.
I'm just wondering, then: why the continued focus on negative campaigning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. One Clinton aide said, to paraphrase, "The bright side is that his negatives
have nowhere to go but up". Hillary's campaign is going to keep trying to pull him down, until the superdelegates no longer are sure he's the most electable compared to Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I sincerely hope that's not how it plays out.
I've said I'll vote for Hillary if she wins, but if she decides to run a campaign that dirty, pulling out all the stops to win...It'll be very very painful for me to vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They're going to either give up and hope that a final positive message works, or
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 06:23 PM by wienerdoggie
try to take him out at the knees and cripple him for the general McCain matchup, in a very nasty, specific way. So that they can then turn to the supers and say, we can't run him--look, his poll numbers are going down. He'd be a disaster.

edit to add: They've admitted already they're not targeting voters now, they're targeting the SD's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Desperation, I think
She seems to have done best in (a) home states, (b) states where no campaigning happened, (c) states where only her name on the ballot (and Kucinich, to head off that reply), and (d) states where her opponents did not have as much time to campaign (due to compressed election scheduling).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:19 PM
Original message
I think she'd do better to not listen to Penn and Wolfson...
they're going to drive her campaign straight off a cliff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which is why she'll continue to go negative...
....because her campaign, at every step of the way, continues to do the exact opposite thing that common sense would indicate needs to be done.


She's running the Bizarro-World campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm starting to wonder...haha...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. and also, with the increasing numbers on my ignore list
she does conversely, poorly in the primaries/caucuses. I recommend they both keep it up. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. A Chris Matthews style 'HA!'
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Leave Hillary ALONE!!
She is doing a bang up job for us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. LOL...sorry. I don't want to give Wolfson any GOOD ideas, do I?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC