Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, who was really the source of the McCain sex scandal, dirty lobbyist leak?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:12 PM
Original message
Poll question: So, who was really the source of the McCain sex scandal, dirty lobbyist leak?
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 08:23 PM by sniffa
Not to influence any votes...... so I won't.

Edit: Jeez, I meant to butcher Rudy's name, but not that bad. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mike Bloomberg?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gomer Pyle. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's the worse misspelling of "Giuliani" I've ever seen.
And I've SEEN 'EM ALL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean627 Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Guolianni?
Yes, left out the h...Ghoulianni LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Pat Robertson?
He sees and hears a lot of strange stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mercer
...shhh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. My guess..your hint is one letter
K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Karl?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yeah
certainly and totally possible or probable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I'm not sure I understand the logic of breaking it now.
If Karl and co doesn't want him as the nominee they could have broken it weeks ago. This just gives the Democrats a better chance. Why would Karl want that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. That makes sense. Break it now so it becomes a near non-issue by Nov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Other: RNC -- straight from the Lee Atwater Playbook. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. In January,
I had posted about a passage in Arthur Schlesinger Jr's recently published journals, about McCain's problems with affairs. Arthur said that these would sink any presidential hopes that McCain had.

I think these issues were well-known in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Huckabee is the only one (Ron Paul) out of top 3 that stayed in for some reason.
He'd be my first suspect, then ruling him out... but should I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. You'd think Huckabee whould have put this out a few weeks ago then. nt
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 08:19 PM by Flabbergasted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I'd say that, but...
I don't think he has a shot what soever (even with this scandal), and I also don't think he has the inroads to get this info first, and the contacts to get it out there. My first 4 possibilities are the options aside from other. After mulling over these options I decided that 9/11 is the behind it; I came to the conclusion that it came from one of the dropped out candidates, or maybe some future candidate, and after narrowing it down to Mitt and Rudy (and just to make a note of it - I initially belted out Romney as Bi-Baby and I were watching this), I decided that the Ghoul is the one most likely to have the inroads for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Why? So he can run later? He was soundly rejected and will have
even less clout in four years. Romney? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. God told Huckabee
It's his ordained endorsement for Huck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Fundies had it planned all along
that's why Hucky stayed in.

Now we know the source of the dirty tricks... the "virtuous" ones
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Flynt? Limbaugh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Not LF..he would have announced that himself
not let the NYT do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. And waited until October n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. McCain railing against lobbyists while he was slamming into one, how ironic.
Mark Foley protecting "the Children!!!" from the internet predators while he was one, Ted Haggard the crystal methodist and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. Everyone involved is saying there wasn't any sex... but interestingly...
...the sex details are obscuring the fact that John "Straight Talk Express" McCain was doing legislative favors for a lobbyist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sybbis Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. Not Flynt, he'd wait for the general to bury McCain...
Rush and his merry band of fuckwits is a good call. Coulter and the rest might be responsible as well. They HATE McCain with the heat of a thousand suns. I wonder if this is the much discussed "candidate sex scandal" that the LA Times was sitting on a few months back? It was bound to get some traction sooner or later.

God, that poor Stepford Wife of his must be ready to kick his ancient, Viagra popping ass. I don't think he can weather this, not after what the Republicans did to Bill Clinton.

So - Huckabee can't make it, they're back to Romney. In some ways he's a stronger candidate than McCain but his endorsement and the release of his delegates is a problem.

Since we continue to destroy the Democratic Party from within this season, I suppose it's just as well that the Republicans are in a clusterfuck. Still, it's a pity they didn't wait for the old goat to get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. The other half of the BlondeWhich with Extra McMayo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. McCain. I'm not kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Has he had enough?
Or is he trying to help Clinton be his opponent some how? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Here's my reasoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. evidently
former campaign workers, according to the report.

As hard as it is to believe these days, sometimes newspapers really DO break stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
33. Former McCain staffer was the primary source.
That staffer has been well-compensated by Bush/Cheney top confidante, and will have steady party work forever now.

Secondary, confirming source was a driver.

A few other staffers got cornered into partial confirmations, before clamming up.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC