Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prediction: Obama will pick Edwards as his running mate.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:12 PM
Original message
Prediction: Obama will pick Edwards as his running mate.
Edited on Thu Feb-21-08 02:15 PM by sparosnare
I know, I'm not a psychic or an oracle and I don't have a crystal ball into the future. But I'm noticing a trend - former Edwards staffers and supporters moving to Obama, endoresements by unions who would be in Edwards' camp and now word that Plouffe is in NC.

I might be wrong but then I might not be. Edwards might not have endorsed yet for a reason. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup, and I've thought so for weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I seriously doubt it
I think he'll pick someone with lots of foreign-relations and national security experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samdogmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I agree--he has to get a "Cheney"!
Someone who will dispel all of the concern over "lack of experience"--and he needs someone popular in or from one of the BIG states or regions.

I've been intrigued by Sen. Webb of VA--but I'm waiting to see who gets the nod
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. That would be great, but I'm not sure Edwards wants another VP run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think not. IMO, Richardson. He needs someone close with extensive foreign policy experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Richardson is a lock
for the above reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Richardson would be an excellent choice
So would Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NDambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. RICHARDSON...would be an excellent choice
and maybe Richardson knows that which is why he hasn't endorsed.

Biden..eh...not a bad choice..but I think Richardson would be a better one..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. Yep - and experience outside of the legislative kind
Edwards does not, Richardson does. Richardson is from out west, and is half-Mexican, Edwards is neither. Richardson has been my guess for awhile now for all of those reasons...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. that would be an excellent choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Edwards would make a great AG
He was one hell of a trial lawyer and I would LOVE to see him try former members of the Bush Misadministration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. I agree 100% - He should be AG whether it's Obama or Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Edwards has already been "vetted" in a Presidential race.... could be a good move....
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. I doubt that, but I will say this much: The longer the primary goes on...
the more likely you are to be right.

As the primary goes on, the Dem. Party gets more and more divided. And Obama's tapping Edwards will shore up the Edwards supporters and help unite the party. It's the best unifying move Obama can do short of tapping Clinton, and I still dismiss that as an impossibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. I Was Just Talking A Little Bit Ago At The Coffee Station With A Few Guys And That's Who They Picked
I'd say it a very plausible possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. I doubt that
Obama needs someone seasoned with years (and years...) of government experience who shores up his credentials with foriegn policy so he isnt at a disadvantage to McCain in the GE.

Edwards wouldnt fit either of those two requirements, but he would definately be a good choice for a cabinet position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't think so. In fact, I don't think there's any way.
Neither Obama or Edwards have serious foreign policy creds. And Edwards was a one term Senator with no other legislative or governing experience. That ticket would look really weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peaches2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Has to pick for experience
Edited on Thu Feb-21-08 02:20 PM by peaches2003
VP has to come with foreign policy and security experience, Obama's weak suit, to counter McCain's only decent talking point (though there is no doubt McCain would have us in war after war and I think he's a madman). I agree with the others on this. Edwards doesn't add anything that Obama doesn't already have himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. IMO he needs someone with more experience
Especially foreign policy experience. I love Edwards - I was an Edwards supporter - but I think a better choice would be Richardson or even Chris Dodd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COFoothills Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. Prediction: You are wrong n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. VP I don't think so. He's too talented. Question where can Edward's be most helpful to everyone.
I'm looking forward to his continued presence in defining U.S. issues and concerns. Obama is popular but that's about it. Obama is nothing more than a Tom Cruise of the Dem party. Why do women swoon at their feet? Why do people go "gaga" over their every word? It's the "halo effect." I didn't vote for Bush but I remind people that they get what they voted for. I won't vote for Obama but you will get what you voted for. An actor playing a good roll and getting the big bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. No, I don't think so
Obama will pick a national security VP. The war's got to end and the troops be withdrawn first and foremost; and he will need the heft on the ticket to run against McCain. So would Hillary if she were the nominee, but to a lesser extent because of Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. bob graham, bill richardson or joe biden...
Edited on Thu Feb-21-08 02:33 PM by QuestionAll
it will be one of those three, IF he gets the nomination.

if hillary wins, her running mate will be wesley clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. How about Chafee?
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. No telling until McCain's story shakes out
It's no use talking about a running mate until we have a better idea of who the Republican nominee will be, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. Edwards wouldn't accept it
Someone like Biden or Richardson would be a better choice. My dream candidate would be Barbara Boxer but
I doubt that's possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. No.
He needs to go with someone who has more experience, and expecially with someone who has credentials in national security. Wes Clark would be my ideal, though I doubt that would happen. Maybe someone like Jim Webb.

Hate to say it, but Edwards already had and blew his chance as running mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. hmm...lotsa choices
Richardson brings a large demographic under the Obama tent...Also a likeable guy, fairly progressive

Biden gives him the foreign policy street-cred...

Edwards gives name-recognition, but Obama already has former Edwards voters anyway...

Webb is the choice of the pundit world...

Kerry is a dark horse with the 'veteran' cred all tied up, and he's pre-swift-boated.

Claire McCaskill gets all the 'women-voting-on-gender-only' former Hill-backers...


My prediction

P - Obama
VP - Richardson
SS - Biden
SD - McPeak
AG - Edwards

Kerry, McCaskill, Webb, Kucinich all get cabinet positions..?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
28. Far off, my friend
nice try though. Edwards has waited far too long to endorse, that shows incompetency,
flawed judgment. This is Edwards problem, the same judgment that eluded him during
the primaries has come back to hunt him. Same thing in the senate.

If he wanted to be a change candidate, he could have endorse from the day he suspended
his candidacy.

This is not a game, this is about the American people

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. I thought Edwards/Obama was unbeatable. But Obama/Edwards would be very strong.
Not sure if Obama would pick Edwards though.

Edwards was the VP nominee in 2004. I'm not sure Obama would pick him again for another election four years later, and plus Senator Obama should go with someone with more experience. Like maybe Senator Kerry or Senator Biden. Hell, what about General Wesley Clark?

....What am I talking about. Barack hasn't won the nomination yet. Let him win the nomination, then we'll talk. I'm pulling for Hillary, and I think she is going to win the next few states. This thing is FAR from over. If Clinton is the nominee, I'm pulling for Clinton/Clark!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC