Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A tool of the Military-Industrial complex

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:26 PM
Original message
A tool of the Military-Industrial complex
0bama he just exposed himself in the debate

He'll be ready to attack any country

invest in arms and re-arming

increase our military

everything Lockheed and Bechtel are happy to hear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. So why are they giving their money to Hill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. really, you better look again at his contributors and
as he said, he cant help it if the people who work for those companies are
contributing to him....
right, contribute and keep our industry and your job going - not hard to figure out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Read the link. Follow the Money-- It doesn't lie!
number of military donations…from the Defense industry.
Posted on October 19, 2007 by Lance
The ever famed ‘Military-Industrial Complex’ has picked their candidate of choice: Hillary Rodham Clinton. When Hillary takes office, do not be prepared to see an anti-war populist of any sort. She is as establishment as Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson, ready to declare war on Iran at a moment’s notice. The defense industry sees this and, I think, has made a good investment. Well, good if you’re a defense contractor. The Huffington Post reported:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Could you please name a candidate who WOULD NOT be a tool...
...for the MIC? Any person who would be President of this country, and went against the MIC, would find themselves six feet under in Arlington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds Like Our Next President!
Sorry, I'm feeling cynical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Same contributors as Bush - doesnt that make you a wee bit suspisicious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Not as suspicious as this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. I dunno. BO doesn't have the guy who defended Blackwater working on his payroll
BTW, what is Mark Penn doing these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is it odd that so many soldiers support Obama?

many want out of the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Obama wont take them out of M.E. - said he's keeping embassy n force there..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Not combat forces n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Junior decimated the military. This is Obama being Commander-In-Chief and fixing it.
Edited on Thu Feb-21-08 10:27 PM by AtomicKitten
Responding to your other insinuation:

Defense Industry Embraces Democrats, Hillary By Far The Favorite
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/10/17/defense-industry-embraces_n_68927.html
October 17, 2007 11:07 PM

The defense industry this year abandoned its decade-long commitment to the Republican Party, funneling the lion share of its contributions to Democratic presidential candidates, especially to Hillary Clinton who far out-paced all her competitors.

An examination of contributions of $500 or more, using the Huffington Post's Fundrace website, shows that employees of the top five arms makers - Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop-Grumman, Raytheon and General Dynamics -- gave Democratic presidential candidates $103,900, with only $86,800 going to Republicans.

Senator Clinton took in $52,600, more than half of the total going to all Democrats, and a figure equaling 60 percent of the sum going to the entire GOP field. Her closest competitor for defense industry money is former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney (R.), who raised $32,000.

Insofar as defense workers making political donations reflect the interests of their employers, the contributions clearly suggest that the arms industry has reach the conclusion that Democratic prospects for 2008 are very good indeed. Since their profits are so heavily dependent on government contracts, companies in this field want to be sure they do not have hostile relations with the White House.

The strong support for Clinton indicates that a majority of defense industry executives currently believe Clinton is a favorite to win the Democratic nomination and, in November, 2008, the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyVT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. I wish people would look more closely at this
He continues to say this, very clearly, but somehow, no one's listening.

He also had a plan to dismantle NASA because he couldn't see its relevance (my husband works there).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC