democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 11:13 PM
Original message |
What did HRC say about superdelegates? |
RL3AO
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Forgot about anything after that.
|
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That the nominee will be decided before the superdelegates are going to vote. |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-21-08 11:14 PM by pirhana
on edit - I was actually surprised she said that.
|
Windy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. She did preface it by stating that rules are rules |
|
however one must wonder how much her message is being driven by others and not by her.
I don't think she has control over her own campaign or message. Maybe if she did, things would be different for her.
Unfortunately, if she doesn't have control, then I have to question her ability to lead.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. No, she said "it will sort itself out" |
|
and we'll have a united party to take back the White House. She did not say there would be a nominee before the superdelegates vote, the transcript is posted below.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
4. My recollection (remember - we all remember things differently :-) |
|
is something along the lines of she kind of made a brushing aside motion and said -- oh, I'm not worried about that. It'll all work out, and we'll have a united Democratic party in the WH.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Here - I posted the excerpt from the transcript: |
stillrockin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message |
5. ducked it, said "it'll all work out" . . . |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |