Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question--Is it true that until the convention, nothing is set in stone?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:18 AM
Original message
Question--Is it true that until the convention, nothing is set in stone?
Until the delegates actually pledge themselves, it's all open?

I don't think Hillary should do anything even vaguely resembling conceding until the convention, even if Obama gets to the magic number.

There is too much going on that will probably hit the news and we should not be saddled with someone who cannot seriously make a good run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I want a brokered convention. I want to see the Ds nominate a third
person because neither Senators Clinton or Obama get enough delegates and the Republicans will not see it coming and have to come up with an entire strategy to bash the D candidate overnight.

The party wacktavists will be kind of mad though-unless the delegates come home and tell them what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorewhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. if clinton stays in the race after the people have spoken
she will forever ruin her career and her husband's legacy

she will drop out after ohio or texas if she does not win both. google bill's comments from the other day. he said so himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I agree, we need a brokered convention given how divided the party is.
Al Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Exactly...a third candidate that no one else is expecting to give those
who would not support the other candidate no matter what a chance to pick someone everyone can agree on.

And boy would it MESS up the R's little plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. I like Gore as much as the next person but can't really see someone
who hasn't been through the grueling primary season just stepping in and taking the prize.

It just doesn't seem fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. Yeah
Our big problem this year is that we have TWO very strong candidates - so let's choose someone who didn't get a single vote, has no money, and has no campaign organization. That's smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. I can't imagine a surer path to defeat
Both Hillary and Barack have gotten millions of votes. Kicking the first woman and the the first black man to the curb for a white male (and who else is there?) would completely alienate millions. It's the only scenario in which I would not vote. And I sure as hell wouldn't be alone. And if you think the pukes couldn't attack, well.... Oh, and how in hell could someone else pull together a presidential campaign in August for Novemeber? It's totally ridiculous. Fortunately, it will NEVER happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I agree, it's handing the election to the GOP
Actually, the sooner we have a nominee now the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Well our forebearers always managed to handle it.
Guess we are lamer then them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. You are just so sure Barack is going to screw it up that
you want Hillary waiting in the wings to save us? :eyes: Say it isn't so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Are you suggesting Hillary try to go after Obama's pledged delegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. She'll have NO MONEY. Hate to be the one to tell you that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. She won't have to do much except keep visiting various cities and
towns, talking to people and continuing her campaign in a more leisurely manner.

She could give speeches hither and thither, talking about issues but not necessarily putting herself forward as a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. in the last 90 days before the general election?
In 90 days she's be hard pressed to make it out of Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I'm talking about the time before the convention.
I'd say finish the all the primaries even if she's behind the count on delegates.

I read here at DU that the Rezko trial is starting at the end of this month. She should absolutely stay in the race until then and a few weeks after.

She should finish the primary season, no matter what the MSM or Obama says. They have wanted her to drop out for a long time, something to do with Faux Big Mo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. She's be a laughing stock . A traveling joke.
Once someone is done, they're done. She's not there yet, but if she loses TX or Ohio, it's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, the delegates can "vote their conscience" but that is a technicality
Remember the convention is in August, If we don't start a GE campaign before that then McCain has a huge advantage. He has already started his GE speeches.

We need this to end no later than the first part of June. April would be better and March 5th would be better still. (most were planning on Feb. 6th, so a one month set back isn't that bad).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yeah it looks like McCain is off to a really good start. Ahem,
while you make some very good points, and I would pretty much agree with you normally, things are somewhat different this time around.

I think Bush has made the Dems job a little easier as far as campaigning. Pretty much everyone knows they want the opposite of what's been going down in the country during his reign.

Also, hate to mention it but, ahem, Obama has a big scandal that is just about ready to blow. The delegates and party elites may just think twice before handing him the nom. As far as the people are concerned, they will most likely have some buyer's remorse as the whole thing plays out on the evening news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. What I'm saying is, Bottom line, if there's no concession, she is still viable
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 01:27 AM by anamandujano
if necessary.

edit to add--that's a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. as viable as Huckabee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. That may be more viable than people think
Wait and see if the sex scandal has legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Great! Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. Hillary cannot even manage a primary campaign
with candidates who pretty much treated her with kid gloves. If she can't handle that, with over $100 million, then how in the hell do you think she's going to be able to handle the GE? She's run a horrible campaign, she's alienated voters with the same old same old attack politics and blustering foreign policy, she's presented the worst of the Democratic Party with big govt health care mandates; how do you think she could win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. Note to poster #18, sorry, whoever you are, you've been on ignore
for awhile. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
23. this is why people 'suspend' their campaigns rather than concede.
a la Edwards.

but, yes, your OP is essentially correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
26. Yeah thats a BRILLIANT idea.
Ignore the will of the people. Steal the vote. Genius.

Mark Penn is that you pretending to be anamandujano on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. agreed the DNC, Hillary and the super delegates all know this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC