|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ariesgem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:07 AM Original message |
The Secret Service told Dallas police to stop screening for weapons at Obama rally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
1. That makes absolutely no sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meshuga (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
2. Pretty scary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
3. Might be time for Obama to hire his own security until the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThatBozGuy (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 09:04 AM Response to Reply #3 |
20. The Secret Service INCREASED protection of Mr Obama not decreased |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 09:21 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Balderdash, but thanks for the spirited defense of the SS troops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. Wow you certainly know your security details.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nailzberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
36. RFK did not have secret service protection. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagickMuffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
4. Even a Madman can seem friendly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 11:34 AM Response to Reply #4 |
27. Right. A member of the police would never ever look at security in this way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Submariner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
5. Yeah right.....Sirhan Sirhan was friendly too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lse7581011 (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
6. And In Dallas No Less? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #6 |
31. Is that chilling or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:21 AM Response to Original message |
7. The good news is that the rally is over, and that this has been exposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
32. so this rally already happened? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. That is how I read the UPI article, but it is quite serious /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glimmer of Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:21 AM Response to Original message |
8. That is crazy. I hope this isn't a standard practice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemzRock (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:32 AM Response to Original message |
9. Oh boy... Dallas, eh!? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobRossi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
10. Orders from the top no doubt. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
11. In Dallas for christsakes!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
12. "the crowd seemed friendly" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NDambi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 08:53 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. No diggity! Unfricking believable! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 09:04 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Something is absolutely wrong with the secret service. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ossman (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
13. How about Blackwater? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
14. Nothing to see here...move along now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my2sense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
15. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Araxen (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
16. It only takes one "friendly" person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
18. Bottom line - who do you complain to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheZug (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
21. Outrageous. People need to be fired, immediately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seen the light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
23. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
24. Stunning. Those service members must be fired! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithfulcitizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
25. Appalling! People need to be fired quickly for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
26. This is insane! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
28. I demand to know the "logic" behind this decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. Plan B. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
29. There was no screening at all at any of the rallys I attended in NH. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seen the light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
30. So how long before this disappears down the memory hole? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
COFoothills (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
34. You gotta be careful in Dallas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
35. is this rally over? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ariesgem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. This story came out after the rally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-22-08 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
39. Extremely disturbing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC