Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about health care plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Indy Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:10 AM
Original message
Question about health care plans
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 09:15 AM by Indy Lurker
Both Obama and Hillary say you can keep the insurance you have.

My question is why would most companies continue to offer the same insurance if they dump employees off to a government plan.

ON EDIT: This would seem most likely for low income people. A company could offer to pay the sliding scale premium for the government plan, and probably save $3000 per employee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. If you're talking about employer provided healthcare it's not up to them.
Not unless they would enact some measure that would prohibit employers from eliminating or reducing employee/retiree medical benefits. Right now employers are moving to high deductible catastrophic-only policies, coupled with healthcare savings accounts. In these plans the goal is to have the employee bear all costs, and the employer none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. maybe I'm lucky
I have to pay about $3500 per year, and my company puts in $4000 per year, this give me a $25 office visits, $1000 deducible and 20% copay to an out of pocket max of $3000 for hospital type stuff (plus the $1000 deducible)

I could see our company (and many others) dropping all health care, and offering to pay employees a monthly amount to cover a portion of the premiums of the government program (assuming it is less than their paying now) This would even allow the company to cut out an HR person, who does all the medical stuff.

And since the premiums of the government plan is based on income, the less employees are paid, the less their health care will cost the company (if they are paying out a sum of money equal to the premiums)

Hope my point makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Companies would be allowed in on the public plans.
From Hillary's plan

2) A Choice of Health Plan Options: Businesses, employees, and the uninsured will have the
option of buying group insurance through a new Health Choices Menu. This Menu will
give all Americans the same set of insurance options that their Member of Congress has.
Without creating new bureaucracy, the Menu will be part of the Federal Employee Health
Benefit Program (FEHBP), which includes numerous, high-quality private health insurance
options. The Health Choices Menu will have the purchasing power of millions of
Americans in securing high-quality and affordable insurance. States will also have the
option of banding together to offer the same type of choices in a region of the country if
they wish. The benefits will be as good as those offered to Members of Congress. Such
coverage includes mental health parity, and many plans offer dental coverage. In addition,
as a condition of doing business with the federal government, insurers must cover highpriority
preventive services that experts agree are proven and effective. This focus on
prevention will improve health and lower costs in the long run.

Obama has something similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's exactly the plan. Swell the rolls of the public plans till they become dominant.
You could have defacto single payer thru "free market" mechanisms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's fine
I guess my concern is that either plan was banking on seeing the same amount of dollars from employers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama's plan has penalties for employers who don't provide coverage
Not sure about Clinton's plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC