MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-22-08 02:37 PM
Original message |
|
Can a candidate mock the other candidate as being a plaigiarist ("Change you can Xerox"), then go on to plagiarize one of her husband's speechs - who, in turn, is an admitted plagiarist ( http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/20/pastor-gratified-by-bill-clintons-use-of-his-line/). And then supporters call her "gracious". Feh.
|
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-22-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
1. She should stop being silly. |
elixir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-22-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Earth to MannyGoldstein, take a long walk. |
dionysus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-22-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. facts you can't deny hurt eh? |
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-22-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
3. you can get away with this stuff though |
|
if the media supports you. In the same way Bush lied through the second debate about "fuzzy math" and the stories afterwards were about Gore's "lies". Thanks to the M$M you can lie at the same time you call your opponent a liar.
|
Kittycat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-22-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Olberman brought it up - actually referencing Edwards first. |
|
Which I thought, on a whole, was quite like what she said, and more recent. I really thought there at the end she was being sincere - until a couple hours later when I heard about edwards' comment, then bill clinton's. My stomach just turned at that moment, and it thoroughly disgusted me.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-22-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-22-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. This is a pretty weak tactic |
|
If emilyg says it's done, it's done!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |