Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Pentagon should know how many weapons there are in Afghanistan. Right? Maybe not...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:02 PM
Original message
The Pentagon should know how many weapons there are in Afghanistan. Right? Maybe not...
Well, maybe not. Obama made the suggestion in the debate in Austin that US troops in Afghanistan do not have enough weapons and protection. The Pentagon released a statement disagreeing with that assertion.

Obviously, the Pentagon keeps good records and certainly can attest where all the weapons are going in the so-called War on Terror, right?

Well...maybe not so much.

Maybe they forget a little story last August where the GAO said that the Pentagon doesn't know where 30% of the weapons are that were sent to Iraq from 2004 onward.

Weapons Given to Iraq Are Missing
GAO Estimates 30% of Arms Are Unaccounted For

By Glenn Kessler
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, August 6, 2007; Page A01

The Pentagon has lost track of about 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and pistols given to Iraqi security forces in 2004 and 2005, according to a new government report, raising fears that some of those weapons have fallen into the hands of insurgents fighting U.S. forces in Iraq.

The author of the report from the Government Accountability Office says U.S. military officials do not know what happened to 30 percent of the weapons the United States distributed to Iraqi forces from 2004 through early this year as part of an effort to train and equip the troops. The highest previous estimate of unaccounted-for weapons was 14,000, in a report issued last year by the inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/05/AR2007080501299.html


I guess we can count on the mainstream media to check out these stories, although they are a couple months old. The Pentagon certainly should know all about how many weapons are accounted for in Afghanistan based on their Iraqi Occupation records. Right? So they are missing 30% in Iraq. Afghanistan is...um....different.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, no, all it takes is a little
reprogramming. That's right! The "missing" 30% are in Afghanistan, along with a brazillion Kalashnikovs and who knows what else. When I was there a few months ago, I talked to a number of civilians, all of whom had their own guns...but only vague accounts of where they actually came from. Only one of them was "licensed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC