Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

All of these bogus charges of sexism & racism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 04:54 PM
Original message
All of these bogus charges of sexism & racism
do nothing but water down the true meaning of the words.

It's making me a tich sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Depends on what you mean.
The original 'slights' - you're right. But the reactions to those have brought out responses that have been flat out racist and/or sexist.

Then, of course, there are the trolls here who claim to support one or the other and spew racist/sexist crap to taint the candidates - after the elections we will, no doubt, see the "ha-ha" posts as they boast of fooling us all.

Don't give them too much credence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's flimsy stuff. Both Obama and Clinton supporters...
... do their cause a disservice by engaging in it.

While we're on the topic... I have to suppress a gigggle everytime I hear one or the other's partisans referring to the divide as a "party split". Party splits happen for ideological reasons. ( Kennedy-Carter, Humphrey-McCarthy, Ford-Reagan, Goldwater-Rockefeller).

There is simply not enough difference , ideologically, between our two leading candidates. It's not a 'party split". It is the pointless bitterness of two highly competitive camps, many ( not ALL) of the denizens of which, having chosen one candidate or the other on the basis of gender or racial loyalty or identity ( and NOT on the basis of ideology or philosophy) have lost the forrest for the trees.

One of the two will be nominated. The Democratic electorate will overwhelmingly support the nominee.

What , on earth, would be the alternative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Over 80% dialogue is spoken by male actors. Disney's ratio is worse. Women's voices are still
not considered the 'norm'.

There IS latent sexism. Hell, I'm a sexist. I'm just smart enough to count to ten and not act on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC