Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Since when do Democrats attack one another on universal health care?'"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Ghost Donating Member (557 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:43 PM
Original message
"Since when do Democrats attack one another on universal health care?'"
"Well, since she started saying that I’m against universal health care, that’s when it started," he answered. "Something that she repeats every single day."

Obama responds in Akron :

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0208/Obama_responds_and_hits_Clintons_experience.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe if she actually proposed "Universal Health Care"
it would strike a chord and I would actually listen. Obama doesn't propose it either, but at least he gives lipservice to the actual problem. The problem isn't that people are uninsured, the problem is the whole private healthcare/insurance system is a racket. The first goal should be bring costs down, not making people pay a ransom to Blue Cross so they can live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "lawyer" should know Hill's is "universal" and O's isn't and will therefore cost more
so as to cover the freeloaders who game the system.

The goal of getting costs down is in each's plan - but is a con if you expect a cut in expenses thats more than a one years normal increase in health costs (when those ideas are implemented)/

The insurance companies profits must go up 15% each year to keep the stock up so the premium and thus the cost of health care will likewise increase for no good reason beyond the fact that insurance companies that should be used as they are now in Medicare - as administrative services only clerk providers - are allowed to claim a "risk" and demand a "risk premium" that increases every year.

Only Hillary and Edward's Medicare like option will be a start on changing this situation - and while Obama has the same in his plan, he also has us on notice that he will give it away so as to get some GOP LOVE and thereby "change the atmosphere" in DC.

I suggest that what she is saying might strike a chord if you tune out the media noise so that you can get a better listen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm going to guess that you work in the insurance industry
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 10:46 PM by DefenseLawyer
Because only an insurance guy would say the problem with healthcare in this country is "freeloaders who game the system". I've got news for you chief, the problem is the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Here, here!
I am so sick to death of this phony debate. If it were Dennis Kucinich complaining that Obama's plan wasn't universal, that would be different. But Hillary's plan is not universal either, and this is a phony argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Minor bone pick....It is "Hear, hear!", not "Here here!" The latter is for calling a
dog. The former is for asking people to listen up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Since when do Democrats compare other Democrats to Karl Rove?" Better question. n/t
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 10:08 PM by casus belli
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Answer: When one dishonestly peddles universal health INSURANCE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. They conveniently forgot the "mandate" of 2006
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 10:20 PM by mac2
for National Health Care by the voters. It's another...well "we will give you crumbs policy". Isn't my idea great? No I say.

Public Citizen's Health Letter, February,2008 (under "outrage of the month" section) says, the "drug industry spends almost twice as much on promotion of drugs as on research". It's billions.

"That amounts to an average expenditure of $61,000 per physician in a promotion year". Heck the doctor could give his patients free drugs for that amount.

That is no surprise to me since we tax payers usually pay for NIH federal grants to develop new drugs. The foreign countries who manufacture the drugs which we developed don't pay us back either.

It's a big ripoff. Drugs should be cheaper here since we pay for their development..CONGRESS!!! It's obvious that the drug corporations are paying for their vote regarding drugs for Americans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Check out Hillary's attack on Obama's healthcare plan in PDF format
http://www.wispolitics.com/1006/080217ClintonMailer.pdf

Since when? Since she started running...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Since when does one pro-choice dem dare question another pro choice dem's belief in abortion rights
Thats what id like to know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. because Obama possibly isn't one did you read what he said about Clinton .....
"she part of the Democratic network in Washington"


so what Obama you're not a democrat?

ummm no wonder you pander to and care more about the rethuglican voters and saying Reagan was better than Clinton and that` the GOP is "the party of ideas"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC