Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama could pick up another Delegate in Nevada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:23 AM
Original message
Obama could pick up another Delegate in Nevada
U.S. Sen. Barack Obama has won 59 percent of the Washoe County convention delegates, despite having won just 51 percent of the Washoe County votes in the caucuses. U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton failed to turn out enough volunteers to fill all of the county delegate spots she won in the caucuses. The final Washoe County results are:

Obama: 972 delegates, 59 percent. That's compared to 855 he had won in the caucuses.
Clinton: 683 delegates, 41 percent. That's compared to 697 she had won in the caucuses.

http://www.rgj.com/blogs/inside-nevada-politics/2008/02/obama-picks-up-more-county-delegates.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. WOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. What goes around will definitely come around
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 02:31 AM by liberalnurse
and bite Obama in the "add" when the math is all done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. This doesnt appear to be Obama stealing delegates from Hillary though
This looks like Hillary's people just didnt show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. expain... All i see here is HRC's campaign messing another thing up
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 04:22 AM by landonb16
10% in pa too.

Her people didn't show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well thats a little fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Uh Oh, delegates switching after the vote isn't good. not good at all,.
I don't have an issue with the Edwards delegates moving because he "suspended" his campaign. The Clinton delegates dropping from 697 to 683 isn't great though.



I clearly understand that this is a Representitive Democracy and I would not suggest changing that. I simply feel that the Representitives elected should reflect the will of the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Seems a little weird to me to,o although I don't understand the rules...
from reading that article though it seems like, he got those delegates, because the people for her side that were eelected, didn't even show up. It almost seems like the equivalent of us voting for a politician, and he just never showed up in office to accept the job,even though the people voted him/her in which is why the obama delegates that were there made up a larger percentage of the vote. Seems like it could have been prevented by better organization/attentiveness by the Clinton campaign. But that's just my interpretation after reading the article and I don't have a firm grasp of nevada electoral politics =P, so a more knowledgable member may correct me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. nobody shifted, HRC people didn't show up... it was based on %
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. She's Done The Same Thing In PA....
Rendell even extended the deadline for her & she still didn't nominate enough delegates. I'd say she's not ready, even before day one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Which is why I find it hilarious
That the Clintonites were floating that trial balloon about stealing delegates at state conventions. The fact that they have no ground game and are too incompetant to even field a full slate of delegates in PA despite the extended deadline makes that suggestion laughable. This is just more evidence of their incompetance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Hey
I'm an Obama supporter but I don't understand how that is fair. This could be done by Hillary's campaign, too. I get the gist of county delegations and how you have to elect there then go to district and then state. But this seems kind of wacky, still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Obama campaign didn't do anything
Hillary's delegates just didn't show up. There is going to be a convention in August. If delegates don't show up, it's not any particular candidate's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Ok.
Still seems kind of strange. But I guess I won't complain. :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMatt Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. You are right
It is complicated and not the most democratic process. However, as the previous poster noted, trying to flip delegates is very cynical, underhanded and even more anti-democratic than the process itself. Having delegates not show up is either incompentant on the part of the campaign, or often due to waning support. It's actual very common for delegates pledged to a campaign that has already withdrawn to lose interest and not show up.

So that is really the question: is Hillary's ground game that bad or are her supporters just losing interest or recognizing reality before the campaign does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. What would his wife say about that?
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 02:42 AM by Breeze54
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. Obama's campaign as always trhoughout this thing is on it!
I got 3 calls and an Email asking me to show at the convention today. Despite the fact that I wasnt elected as a delegate in the original caucus. His campaign is amazingly efficient.

I wasnt able to go today as I had other commitments allready. After hearing how it went though I really wish I could have cleared my schedule. It had to be sweet I heard it was chaos! The Dem party leadership here in Vegas is stacked in Hillaries favor they must have been shitting purple today at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC