|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:45 AM Original message |
Finally saw clip of Clinton's display of outrage at Obama. Where was that fury after Abu Ghraib? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, neither of them have shown much outrage over the truly outrageous acts of our government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
71. Exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:50 AM Response to Reply #71 |
120. Hillary was the one who freaked out, not Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:53 AM Response to Reply #120 |
124. Obama showed no Outrage whatsoever for any of the same subjects... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #124 |
134. Obama commanded tv cameras and mics from 2001-2006? Really - he was the Dem party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
102. Bingo n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
109. The difference is one of them doesn't show fake outrage on the campaign trail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. I think there's plenty of blame to spread on the lack of outrage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. I remember clearly Kerry, Dean and Clark all calling for Rumsfeld's head in 2003 and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:38 PM Original message |
Oh yeah? What about Obama? Where is his outrage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
62. Those matters happened when CLINTONS were the faces of our party and its best known |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Clinton and Obama were both in the Senate during much of that time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. SHE is the one showing outrage NOW over mailers. Obama doesn't SHOW fury as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriouslyfrivolous (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #66 |
123. Her outrage is totally manufactured. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #62 |
94. great posts -- original and follow-up -- blm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
64. Obama was a state senator in 2003 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #64 |
133. And Obama was only elected to the US Senate in late 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
3. Where did you see it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Here's a link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Danke! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. MSNBC. I read some of the threads yesterday but I didn't see the 'out of control' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
88. She's unhinged. Yea it was fake outrage but why even go there unless you are falling apart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. It's on another thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
4. INDEED! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
6. Here is Obama's measured and mature response...video link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
90. Thanks, I haven't seen this before. He can sure stand his ground. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kokonoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. To be fair, she was not really outraged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. She must have exceeded the dosage suggested on her bottle of "Feign-Feign" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
12. no kidding!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calmblueocean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
13. My thoughts exactly. Her outrage over this, and her lack of outrage over what matters, is revolting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
14. This is an astounding post.. and one we should all think about very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. It was a staged "stunt." And it came across that way. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
16. It's manufactured, calculated, FAKE outrage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
63. Outrage you can Xerox! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
76. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #63 |
80. Hah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
psychopomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:30 PM Response to Reply #63 |
87. Nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #63 |
95. Kicking this thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #63 |
101. Hahahahahahaha! Good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beezlebum (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:00 AM Response to Reply #63 |
125. nice! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
17. Where was Obama's outrage? Must be a lot of it somewhere...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Obama was not a leader of the Dem party with the most access to cameras and mics AT THE TIME. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. Well, she did go out of her way to throw John Kerry under the bus for a joke-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #18 |
37. Didn't she say something like.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:15 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Hillary Clinton is 100% for Hillary Clinton. Every action she has ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
19. hilary's a fake and any person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
21. Where was her outrage when people were dying in New Orleans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Bill went on Larry King Live after Katrina and wouldn't say a word against Bush's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. They were best buds with Bush for a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindMatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
24. None of those things affected her personally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
25. The Audacity of Hillary's Selfishness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. His campaign is welcome to it. Hillary's outrage here is "just words' imo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calmblueocean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
26. K&Ring this to get some Clinton defenders in here to defend it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
27. Hillary for Hillary 2008. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
29. Because they are simply full of shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
30. Exactly. Hooray for Hillywood. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
31. Hillary is not fit to be Commander in Chief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. I disagree - this is not being 'nuts' it is being calculating. She calculated wrong, imo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. See, I think giving an angry, outraged-appearing PERFORMANCE for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. In that sense you are right. Plus the narcissism isn't exactly healthy, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 02:00 AM Response to Reply #34 |
105. You think she actually "calculated" being that way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psyop Samurai (873 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
32. shhhh.... you're supposed to look at this mirror over here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
35. Hillary Clinton: 35 years of being a stalwart defender of, and advocate for, Hillary Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
36. Tell me about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
38. Invisible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
39. Oh, SNAP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VenusRising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
41. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
44. Exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
45. HRC is finishing off her campaign... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
46. Neither of them showed any real outrage - they are corporate puppets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. The difference is that one was face of Dem leadership for YEARS and could command cameras |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
47. You just make me smile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unbowed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
48. I've never seen her that outraged about anything before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #48 |
83. Scares the mud out of me to think how she'd handle a military crisis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadmessengers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
49. I just clicked Recommend so hard... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
50. Exactly. K&R. Save the "outrage" for a real issue. It's not flyin'. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #50 |
74. well, we had a candidate who showed disgust for these horrible acts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
51. Deleted sub-thread |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
52. that should be a campaign flyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mculator (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
54. This is stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Binka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. This Is Not Stupid Give It A Rest! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentj44 (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
55. please send this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
56. Deleted message |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
57. Excellent point!! I have no problem with her being feisty... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:56 PM Response to Reply #57 |
67. If she HAD shown this level of outrage and opposition, she'd BE our nominee by now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Torn_Scorned_Ignored (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
58. @ OutRage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
59. Where is Obama's outrage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #59 |
68. From 2001-2005 there was no Sen. Obama. And until 2007 he wasn't considered a leader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vireo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #68 |
77. Then why is his 2002 "antiwar" stance considered significant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:50 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Only in that he took it. The theme here is about selective OUTRAGE shown by a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #77 |
96. because he was right and was brave enough to speak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
60. But none of those things directly interfered with her own ambitions! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
69. Great post. Of course the answer is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
70. That's unfair, she did have outrage over the Iraq war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:23 PM Response to Reply #70 |
84. Before or after she voted for it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
72. Oh man. This is the state of the Obama campaign. Terrified of a Clinton recovery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
writes3000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #72 |
81. You're deflecting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
73. Agree...it did come off as "feigned." A better description that the sexist crap that's been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
75. Hillary reminds of a soap opera female villain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
78. She only gets outraged or tearful over HER political ambitions. Shameful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
82. Excellent post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
parkeradison (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
85. Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
86. Let's see if a serious reply gets taken seriously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ekwhite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. A serious comment deserves a serious reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #89 |
137. True - she never even showed outrage over Rove's 'Clintons trashed the WH' lie the way she did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:48 PM Response to Reply #86 |
99. I never said Hillary became "unhinged." But the OP has a valid point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:06 AM Response to Reply #86 |
126. Still doesn't show ANY sense of proportion to what she CHOOSES to be outraged about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baconfoot (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
91. Do you not have CSPAN? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
92. none of those things were hindering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
u2spirit (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
93. Because it wasn't about her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
97. Very good point. Where was Obama's outrage, as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
98. Don't you wish Hillary would have shown such outrage at all those horrible things? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dicknbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
100. Now for the good news FARAHKAN ENDORSES OBAMANABLE....Man that's going to go over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #100 |
136. RevMoon won't be happy if McCain goes after Farrakhan, will he? They're tight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemzRock (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
103. So far as outrage goes, those candidates didn't get very far... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
104. Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:09 AM Response to Original message |
106. where was obama's outrage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beezlebum (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:38 AM Response to Reply #106 |
119. why should he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:30 AM Response to Original message |
107. Excellent points --- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitty Herder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:35 AM Response to Original message |
108. That says a lot about the state of politics in this country. Clinton wasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:55 AM Response to Original message |
110. None of those things were about Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:32 AM Response to Original message |
111. A. FUCKING. MEN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:37 AM Response to Original message |
112. Get a grip on your outrage-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:39 AM Response to Original message |
113. Her ire is only raised when her political behind is in jeopardy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:18 AM Response to Original message |
114. Be reasonable, none of those things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
115. Yeah, where was that outrage? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
116. What a silly thread. Even coming from the DUbama Camp, it's just plain silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
117. You need another loooong vacation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beezlebum (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
118. i rather liked obama's response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beezlebum (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
121. and by the way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
122. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
127. her campaign is sinking, desperate measures. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
128. none of the previous things affected her personal ambitions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
129. Link to Obama's outrage on all these topics, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #129 |
130. Obama was a BIGNAME LEADER in the Dem party from 2001-2006? Are you sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
131. K&R!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RememberWellstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
132. Apples and oranges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. How so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC