Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question - If Obama wins the WH, how will he use the former President, Bill Clinton, in his admin?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:35 PM
Original message
Question - If Obama wins the WH, how will he use the former President, Bill Clinton, in his admin?
The truth is, is that Bill Clinton has done so much for poverty around the world, for aids, for the climate.

http://www.clintonfoundation.org/seewherewework.htm

Not to mention the fact that Bill Clinton is loved around the world.

Do you think Obama will embrace him, or ignore him, in his administration?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. You first
What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't know. That's why I was hoping to start a discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. OK - then he won't use him - as he prefers the company of GOPers in his change the
atmosphere in DC approach to selling out the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Well slap my mouth; here's proof of Obama and the GOP; yea, it
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 01:52 PM by babylonsister
really proves he's in bed with them. What a clown. :eyes:

Lugar-Obama Nonproliferation Legislation Signed into Law by the President
Thursday, January 11, 2007

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Lugar Contact: Andy Fisher, 202-224-2079, andy_fisher@lugar.senate.gov, http:// lugar.senate.gov
Obama Contact: Tommy Vietor, 202-228-5511, tommy_vietor@obama.senate.gov, http://obama.senate.gov
Date: January 11, 2007


Lugar-Obama Nonproliferation Legislation Signed into Law by the President

WASHINGTON – President Bush today signed the Lugar-Obama proliferation and threat reduction initiative into law.

Authored by U.S. Sens. Dick Lugar (R-IN) and Barack Obama (D-IL), the Lugar-Obama initiative expands U.S. cooperation to destroy conventional weapons. It also expands the State Department's ability to detect and interdict weapons and materials of mass destruction.

"The United States should do more to eliminate conventional weapons stockpiles and assist other nations in detecting and interdicting weapons of mass destruction. We believe that these functions are underfunded, fragmented and in need of high-level support," said Lugar, Republican leader of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

"The Lugar-Obama initiative will help other nations find and eliminate conventional weapons that have been used against our own soldiers in Iraq and sought by terrorists all over the world," said Obama. "The Nunn-Lugar program has effectively disposed of thousands of weapons of mass destruction, but we must do far more to keep deadly conventional weapons like anti-aircraft missiles out of the hands of terrorists."

"We want to ensure that our government has the capacity to deal quickly with vulnerable stockpiles of shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles, otherwise known as Man-Portable Air-Defense Systems (MANPADS). Such weapons could be used by terrorists to attack commercial airliners, military installations and government facilities here at home and abroad. Al Qaeda reportedly has attempted to acquire MANPADS on a number of occasions," said Lugar.

The Lugar-Obama initiative would energize the U.S. program against unsecured, lightweight anti-aircraft missiles and other conventional weapons. There may be as many as 750,000 man-portable air defense systems in arsenals worldwide, and the State Department estimates that more than 40 civilian aircraft have been hit by such weapons since the 1970s. In addition, loose stocks of small arms and other weapons help fuel civil wars in Africa and elsewhere and provide the means for attacks on peacekeepers and aid workers seeking to stabilize war-torn societies. In Iraq, unsecured stockpiles of artillery shells and ammunition have been reconfigured into improvised explosive devices (IEDs) that have become an effective weapon for insurgents.

more...

http://obama.senate.gov/press/070111-lugar-obama_non/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. Yes, we all know that Pat Leahy and Ted Kennedy and
Russ Feingold and the majority of the House Progressive Caucus are republicans. Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. As an International Figure
Play a role in the Israel affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I hope so. Bill Clinton definitely would be an asset.
Even the asshat-in-chief knows that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
47. I think Bill could make real progress in the Israel affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I absolutely believe the he will make the best use of ALL resources
regardless, of gender, color, creed, status, or former opponent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Great answer :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. If Bill is willing, he needs to be included
He could be a powerful ambassador, spreading goodwill and trying to heal relations with nations that GWB alienated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. Needs to be included is right.
But not in the context you mentioned. More like has a need to be included. Bringing him into the Obama Administration doesn't represent the kind of change that excites me about BO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. keep him the hell out of the White House.
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 01:40 PM by jakem
he can go do something useful.

build houses with carter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Send him to be US ambassador to Serbia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. I'm sure he would do a great job there as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #27
45. They would certainly be interested in having some words with him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raydawg1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. he won't use him, that doesn't really fit with the "change" theme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. He would be a great asset to an Obama presidency! n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Obama would rightly be wary of embracing the Clinton-drama python,
I'm pretty sure. I doubt there'd be any official role for Bill in an Obama government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think he will ignore him completely; Obama has displayed an
arrogance to many established Democrats including Boomers and Gays. Why should he change if he wins the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. He hasn't really ever given the Clinton years any praise and
it would be a shame to throw all that talent away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Fallguy and scapegoat.
For nothing is ever Obama's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. BINGO -we have a winner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. Yup. And it will be a tragedy. For all of Bill Clinton's faults, the world loves him, and he could
really help get us back on the right track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ambassador to the United Nations, perhaps? Perhaps the head of
a special task force on international poverty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janetblond Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Clintons in an Obama WH? NOT Wise!!
I would never have someone work for me who HATES me.
And clearly the Clintonistas HATE Obama.
Notice, I said "HATE" in all caps.
I don't mean "dislike", either.
The level of HATRED I seen in the Clintons is frightening. And what's more frightening, is what the Clintons could do to Obama IF they worked in his WH.
I hope Obama is SMART enough not to make this misstep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean627 Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. I'm with you, Janet.
I haven't trusted the Clintons in a long, long time and even less after this campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
39. Ambassador to the UN is my call
Seems like a job tailor-made for Big Dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bill is such a loose canon these days...
I'd have to ask if he could leave his giant ego at home, and do the work of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrishBloodEngHeart Donating Member (815 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. If Bill is humble enough to work for someone
(which I am not convinced of) he would be a great special ambassador to the middle east. Imagine him and Carter working together on resolving the Palestine/Israel issue. That would be awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. That would be awesome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. well, hopefully
He will tap him for UN responsibilities
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. Ignore him - we want change, not more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. Obama words
I am a friend of Hillarys and I will be a friend after the campaign

Hillary I would want you as and aid.

These are his words, maybe not exact but the meaning the same.. If he would reject Bill Clinton, his life in the W.H. would be limited to 4 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. I say let him continue with his great work
around the world with the Bill Clinton Foundation...he won't be needed or used in any official capacity by an Obama presidency-Gore OTOH I would reach out to if I was Obama-Edwards too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
28. If I were Obama, I would nominate him for the Supreme Court
Bill Clinton would make a great Supreme Court Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
46. Oh yeah, because that wouldn't require a massive struggle for his confirmation.
It isn't worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. If the Dems control both parts of Congress it wouldn't be that hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. The extreme sniping may build a wall too tall to climb ...
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 01:52 PM by Trajan
I hope that unity will be achieved ...

I think it more possible for Obama and Clinton to unify than it will be to unify DU ....

DU is the ultimate kindergarten class ..... with 50,000 ornery, willful students ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. Head of the UN would be a great role for him!
Lets hope there's a chance for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
32. Clinton is not part of any administration now
Why would Obama need to have Clinton as part of his administration? He is much better as an independent entity. That way he may act as a honest broker, not beholden to the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
34. why should he have to
better off using gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
35. I don't see Obama reaching out to either of the Clinton's
if he wins the nomination and election. i don't think he will forgive them for opposing him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. It's not that they opposed him...
it's the *way* they opposed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
37. Ambassador to the UN, IMO
I'd put money on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
38. As long as Bill keeps his wife out of the house, then maybe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
41. Ambassador to Timbucktu
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 06:59 PM by woolldog
I don't want to see him anywhere near the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
44. Intern interviewer? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
49. He doesn't need to. This campaign, the Clintons have effectively put themselves in the past...
something the Republicans tried to do for years, but only the Clinton's could apparently accomplish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
50. I think he'd be a great UN Ambassador
Actually, I wouldn't mind seeing Justice William Clinton on the supreme court either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
51. he should tell Bill to piss off. He's made an utter embarassment of himself
Barrack doesn't need Bill Clinton, in fact none of us do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC