|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:13 PM Original message |
I'll Be Nice And Defend Hillary -- Because There's Something She Shouldn't Be Attacked On |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Agreed. Hillary has many things to be ashamed of but this isn't one of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. Exactly. Talk about grasping at straws. It's pathetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
5. I'm suspect of this myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. Want to bet the GOP was holding onto this story until she got the nod. BTW I agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Oh for crying out loud. The story was in her book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. It would have been used during the GE against her. I also think it's a non-issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. Our judicial system supposedly guarantees everyone a fair trial... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yes, there are a million reasons to dislike Hillary but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I Vote In Pittsburgh (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. agreed n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. I think I agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
11. Attorneys told me they protected civil rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. if your client tells you to question something, they usually do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Only if there was real corroboration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. What witnesses? Do you people even read the article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Yes witnesses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. Completely agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. I was not fond of this attack for two reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:20 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Your actions as an adult |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
15. Nothing in the article suggested she pushed for a plea deal, nor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. i think it would be hard to determine if she did push for one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
16. Agree 100%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. She at least ought to stop trumpeting her so called |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Ridiculous claim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. It's not a "claim". Simply a suggestion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. How about blaming the DA for not doing a better job advocating for the kid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malletgirl02 (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
83. the DA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
46. If I were a lawyer (which I am not), then I would have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. As I just posted in another topic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #22 |
36. Sure she was just doing her job... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #36 |
53. You really are an idiot if this is the point you're going to try to make hay with here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. You suppose she enjoyed this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:35 PM Response to Reply #22 |
72. they have no shame. simple as that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tokenlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
20. I agree except for one point....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Oh give me a break. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yossariant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. If the defense attorney does NOT attack the victim's credibilty, what's left? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mme. Defarge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
23. Obama supporter here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
union_maid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
27. You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
28. I must be obtuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. that when you're a lawyer, you start out defending criminals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. The 5th and 6th Amendments? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #34 |
51. I never said or implied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Yes you did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #52 |
62. No, I didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Well, you're not even a lawyer at all, are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #66 |
77. Of course not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. I am not an attorney. I've not been schooled on laws and civil rights and responsibilities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:40 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Alright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. Yes, I "copped out" of your irrelevant and ridiculous hypothetical question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abacus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:09 PM Response to Reply #84 |
88. No, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. The court system requires lawyers to function n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
37. Suborning perjury is unethical. So is promoting a story you know is false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:35 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. cute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #41 |
58. I'll prove you are not competent to offer the opinions you have. Right here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. dude, what's your problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. My problem is your telling people in your OP that this is nothing to be concerned about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:36 PM Response to Reply #67 |
74. you have 3200 posts in the last 24 days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:42 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. You can count, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:35 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Whatever in the world gives you an idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. You are jumping to conclusions again, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. No, I'm not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. Where's your proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Not going to waste any more time with you. History has shown it's pointless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Yeah because you're always wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:39 PM Response to Reply #71 |
75. You are not listening and you do not want to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
38. Agree -- I didn't even bother reading the article because I could just see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
39. I have an uncontrollable negative reaction to child rape nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pdxmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
40. I work for a criminal defense attorney and sometimes it sucks what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
44. Thank you for explaining this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
45. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamaman2008 (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
47. A Lawyer that would do this, is not a lawyer that should be President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. For the last time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:48 AM Response to Reply #54 |
92. "She was REQUIRED to accept the case" . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #92 |
95. That's the Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gravity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
48. Thanks for the clarification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
55. THAS SRE KAOEUPBD OF U RBGS PHAPBLG-EUBG RAT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. THA*U / SRE -CH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
56. Agreed. And let's not forget that 1975 was a very different time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1awake (852 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
64. yes, its all pretty much BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
69. Why let the facts about the court system get in the way of hyperbole? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
70. same poster just posted a second one -same story. can't we stop this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
73. MR--thank you so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
78. You earned appreciation for this thread, knowing some of your other feelings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malletgirl02 (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
79. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
81. If my daugher were raped I wouldn't care: I'd want to smash that defense attorney's head in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. The defense attorney and not the accused? Not the DA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:50 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. The accused too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 06:01 AM Response to Reply #81 |
94. And you would have every reason to want to do that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RunningFromCongress (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
87. I agree, it's a lawyers job to do everything they can for their client, no matter what their own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rexy (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
89. Another nod of agreement here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comradebillyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
90. thank you magic rat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebaby3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
91. I posted this in the attack thread, but I'll post it here also. As an Obama supporter, I support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:52 AM Response to Original message |
93. I couldn't agree more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC