Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama HAS to pick a military, foreign policy guy as VP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:52 PM
Original message
Obama HAS to pick a military, foreign policy guy as VP
There's no way around it. I can see all the generals lining up now, getting ready to make their McCain commercials, on every talk show they can get booked on.

Got to be a very, very strong foreign policy person to diffuse this!

Webb
Clark
Biden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democrats have a lot of generals too.
Many generals are loyal to the nation and not the republicans. They can see that Bush is tearing down the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. and therefore
more generals are becoming Democrats all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Those three would all work for me, but especially Biden...
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 08:00 PM by polichick
...and maybe Richardson as Sec'y of State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. I like Biden and Webb the best. Biden is great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bob Graham. He's the perfect choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. I really like Webb
He is so quick on the uptake. All three of these men are good suggestions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm an Obama supporter, but he should focus on winning the nomination first and foremost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. but this issue could surface in the primary too
like maybe even tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Of the three
my personal preference at this time would be Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. AGREED. McCain's trump card is his national security experience (so people believe). Take it from hi
m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yup.
The point of the VP is to mitigate the weaknesses of the nominee. Obama's is his lack of experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamaniac Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not Clark, he's too hated by the military. Besides he's a Clinton guy.
But Biden and Webb are my two top choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
42. Clark is hated by the military?
That's right-wing propaganda.

The Army doesn't put four stars on guys they hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamaniac Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
68. He's hated passionately by the military brass. Even those on our side.
That's a well-known fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #42
74. "The Army" doesn't give out stars.
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 12:12 AM by dmesg
That's the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. I like Clark.
I like Biden and Webb where they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Richardson
Zinni
Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. I've heard Zinni's name tossed around by talking heads too. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
67. Zinni would be an excellent choice.
I had no idea he was being considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Here's an article posted today on just this topic if anyone is interested:
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 08:00 PM by babylonsister
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x340924

The fact that Brian Schweitzer was mentioned, and the fact that he speaks Arabic, was surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
50. Excellent article! I recommend anyone reading this thread to check it out. Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ristruck Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Good Point
I like all three names. Biden looks like an awfully strong candidate if he was assured the election. Clark might help him more in the GE though. Obama/Biden or Obama/Clark would be very tough tickets and would offset the one advantage McCain thinks he has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. He will--I don't see him going with a Governor this time around (and no, not Richardson either)--
Webb only has military--has less foreign policy experience than Obama, and less Senate experience. Clark played on Hillary's team--Obama is not going to reward him. My top three choices are Jack Reed (military/economic experience), Joe Biden (foreign policy, respected statesman) and Chuck Hagel (yes, I know--I don't care. Foreign policy, military, AND economic experience).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. Didn't even think about Hagel - I think that's a great suggestion!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. A lot of people here would be pissed at the mere suggestion (although Kerry/McCain almost
happened), but he's the only one who can out-maverick the Maverick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
62. Yeah, probably not a popular choice.
I'm wondering if Hagel isn't of the same mindset regarding Dem/Rep as Webb (from what I learned in the article babylonsister linked to).

And I agree - he can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #33
71. Obama-Hagel could swing Kansas and Nebraska if the Blue tide is big enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
63.  Isn't Hagel the one who won the election by vote fraud with Dibold
voting machines? Yeah! Let's put him on the ticket. We're sure to win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. LOL! Let's harness that power for OUR side, for once!
(just kidding, Nebraskans believe he won his elections fair and square).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe, or he could pick a someone from the Foreign Relations committee or..
...a former ambassador, so long as he lined up in advance who he would choose as his Secretary of State (who could campaign for him).

Im not sure the VP slot really needs a real military guy, so long as Obama has the right military people behind his candidacy in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Graham or Hart
Webb is too new on the scene, Clark is too close to the Clintons, and Biden voted for the IWR.

Webb has the military background, but we need a diplomat far more than a military guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suzie57 Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Richardson
He's an experienced Diplomat, a Governor of a western state and Hispanic. All pluses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm thinking of maybe General McPeak
Former Air Force Chief of Staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. No he doesn't. That's why you have a Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. It's not so much for policy--it's to fill a gap in Obama's resume, or to
help him compete with McCain. McCain is reportedly going to try to get a more-conservative fiscal hawk for VP, to reassure conservatives who took him at his word when he said he didn't know diddly-shit about the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. I find a lot of fault in this logic, but if you were to pick a Democratic Foreign Policy wonk....
then Bill Richardson should be his only choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Well, Bill Richardson is a solid bureaucrat, but was a little gaffe-prone
on the campaign trail, and that last debate he was in (NV), I had to hit the mute button whenever he started talking--and no charisma either. I think it won't be Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. that's why its a good combo: Obama has the charisma, and Richardson the diplomatic cachet
a dream ticket in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. I didn't see the diplomatic cachet--he made a lot of campaign goofs
and rambled about himself too much. I think Bill Richardson frankly proved to be overrated, though still a likable guy. He should try for the Senate, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #34
79. I do not agree
I do not think that Richardson truly has a foreign policy vision, he is probably a good implementer of somebody else's vision. So IMHO, if foregn policy is to be a qualifier for he VP slot, this disqualifies him. And I do not think he would be a good SoS choice either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k8conant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. Only if McCain picks a human n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
25. Good point about going up against McCain.
The other day when Biden was on Meet the Press, he gently called McCain on some BS he was spouting. I'd rather not see Biden be a VP, but he could sure hold his own with McCain. I think Webb could, too -- easily. (and I really like him a lot).

I'm a bit disenchanted with Clark these days.

Like anybody asked my opinion :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. Petraeus, if only because I'd like to watch the internet explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. The "ass-kissing little chickenshit", according to Admiral Mullen--
I don't want him on our side, even if he BEGS us to let him into the party. Which he won't. The neocons control him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. I disagree. Bob Dole wasn't defeated with a ticket...
...associated with the military. Bill Clinton wasn't in the military, and Al Gore served in Vietnam but wasn't associated with his service like Bob Dole.

I think Chris Dodd would make a good VP nominee for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #29
55. Those were different times, though - it's a whole new ball game now.
I'd rather see Chris Dodd as Senate Majority Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. I disagree: the best person would be Richardson, with DIPLOMATIC experience
we need to rebuild and repair our DIPLOMATIC burned bridges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Largely agreed. We need experience avoiding unnecessary wars, not fighting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. exactly. IF you make diplomacy the first and most important choice on the table
you don't need to even pick up the other choices.

Hell, even Nixon knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
70. I agree - BUT - I think a strong milatary/diplomat would be good
to have to head up the move out of Iraq - which will be a difficult task.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yes, especially since he lacks those skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. and Clinton has skills running a war, I guess.
certainly she has proven her willingness to get us embroiled in naked wars of aggression against people that HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11.

so yeah, if you want needless wars that slaughter a million innocent people, I guess Hillary's your girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. And your guy voted to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. So does everyone who doesn't want to see Chimpy snatch canteens and
rifles out of our soldiers' hands and then blame their deaths on the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Yes, the funding bill was all about canteens, wasn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. You really don't understand how defunding would be portrayed, do you?
It's a last resort for a number of reasons--Hillary didn't want to do it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
57. I do. And this country sorely needed a Senator to passionately denounce it on the Senate floor.
Someone like . . . hmmm, . . . do you know any Democratic Senators who can give a good speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. Part of it was getting the MRAP vehicles to the troops. Bush would have
gotten the money some other way even if they'd voted against funding.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. Sure he would. Just give him what he wants. Doesn't matter one bit.
I'm inspired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. We're not going to agree on this. I DO understand your feelings, though. I've
just changed mine regarding this particular issue.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
40. I've heard Zinni a few times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Is he pro-choice? Does he know anything about anything other than the military?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
45. What an original canard.
false premise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
49. Obama people. Don't count your chickens! Keep working having said that. Not webb
He voted the wrong way on the telecommunications bill FOR immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
51. General Anthony Zinni
or Webb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
52. He doesn't have to pick military. Feingold's strong on foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. But, Russ is needed in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #56
72. Not really. A Dem would replace him and we have many great progressives there.
In fact, Russ often fights with the DLC branch of the party. His talents might best be used as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
53. Biden has knowledge but not the Military creds. No service. Obama needs that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
54. Why not a woman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. Is there a politician female w/ military experience?
And Dem to boot?
Who ever it is, Must be Military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
From The Left Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
59. Gen. Anthony Zinni
A democrat and a social liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
61. True. But watch the party folks pressure him to choose a "fave" pol who they "know"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
69. WEBB! WEBB! WEBB!
WEBBBBBBB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

General, former Reaganite, populist, great speaker, ***Southerner***

Come ON!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #69
75. I agree with Webb on many issues but he voted with Mikulski on the FISA bill
We need guys with Webb's credibility to speak out AGAINST
domestic wiretaps on ordinary civilians, not for them.

Unfortunately by doing so, they speak out against a
huge chunk of the military up in suburban Maryland.

Quite a few local liberals work for those Defense contractors installing
telecom routers... most of them only see the small picture and assume
that the infrastructure of dragnet all communications is necessary to
stop terror plots. If a single plot can be prevented by tapping grandma's
phone -- the reasoning goes -- and little bobby turns out to be a member
of a terror cell, it's all justified.

Thing is, Webb is an FDR Democrat turned Reagan Dem turned back again,
and I really don't know where FDR would come down on the warrantless
wiretap issue. But we need guys like Webb in the Senate anyhow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
73. Yeah, he does.
I guess Biden would be the first choice, since he endorsed Obama already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #73
76. Biden didn't endorse Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #76
77. Whoops...
I meant Dodd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:49 PM
Original message
he hasn't endorsed Clinton, has he? Maybe with Dodd moving to O, Joe will too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
81. No, not to my knowledge. I don't think Biden particularly cares for either
of them--I think in Biden's mind, he and Dodd were the only ones qualified to be the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. he hasn't endorsed Clinton, has he? Maybe with Dodd moving to O, Joe will too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
78. It won't be Clark...
I am really disappointed in Clark's support for Clinton, she stands for everything he's railed against. :shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
82. Nah, a woman then we don't lose the HRC voters. Like this one...
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 04:21 PM by barack the house
We so need a woman to bring unity back to the party and especiallly this one in this clip...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyn35HL0eng
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. My prediction in 04 was Obama 08. I now say Obama/rice 08. Susan Rice that is.
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 04:13 PM by barack the house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC