Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Instead of that stupid ass Farrakhan question time would have been better spent in oh I don't know

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:38 PM
Original message
Instead of that stupid ass Farrakhan question time would have been better spent in oh I don't know
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 10:54 PM by Guy Whitey Corngood
the mortgage crisis or something with some actual fuckin' relevance. But maybe it's me I guess I'm ignorant like that. Tim Russert is a huge waste of air time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree
this was the worst of all the debates this campaign. Just godawful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What's next celebrity endorsements. "Senator will you renounce Sean Penn's endorsement".
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 10:41 PM by Guy Whitey Corngood
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. why don't Repubs have to denounce the dozens of racists on AM radio?
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Because many of those racists have very good and lucrative advertisers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thank you!
The crap the "liberal" media lets the repukes get away with is disgusting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. I kept thinking it was a practice round for the GE debates
Every third question was a stupid ass knee-jerk question with no real value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Or they could have asked Clinton to explain her vote for the illegal invasion of Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. A better question would have been why did she go on meet the press
with people like McCain and Lindsey Graham back in the day to tout the so called progress in Iraq. After we all knew already this was a cluster fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. I agree
It was a stupid question. They should've spent more time on the issues that actually mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Hopefully next time they'll get to the real important stuff. Such as who does Paris Hilton support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. agree, it was rediculous. Farrakhan has nothing to do with either candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. He was ready for the Heidi Fleiss endorsement for Hillary but got distracted with a rare hard-on
It was an amazingly stupid question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. he had to denounce Farrakhan if he is going to hold white and/or jewish voters
he did Obama a favor

Farrakhan's views are unacceptable in a national campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It's as irrevlevant as Dan Coulter's supposed endorsement of Clinton. Certain people
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:07 PM by Guy Whitey Corngood
want this to be an issue. It isn't. It was a pitiful waste of time. I'm sure you could come up with 5 better and actually important topics in 5 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. But then the nation would not know that a scary Black Muslim endorsed Obama.
From Pat Buchanan's dirty tricks:

"COVERT OPERATIONS -- We should have as many of these down there as needed to conduct harassment exercises, and embarrassment exercises for the Democrats. They should have no connection at all with the GOP Observation Post, and should be directed out of here, as they have been in the past.

"They should be able to help put demonstrations together, get leaflets out, start rumors, and generally foul up scheduled events -- and add to the considerable confusion and chaos that will inevitably exist."

It continued:

"The preparation of attacks on one Democrat by another -- and 'endorsements' of one Democrat by another, which has to be repudiated, are examples of what can be done. Nothing should be done here, incidentally, which can seriously backfire and anything done should be cleared by the highest campaign authority. The Secret Service, it should be noted, will be all over Miami; and any activity will have to take into consideration their capabilities.

"We should guard here against a) anything which enables the Democrats to blame us for the mess which takes place in Miami Beach; b) anything which can be traced back to us and c) anything which is so horrendous as to damage us, if the hand is discovered."

The memo was labeled "CONFIDENTIAL"


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/watergate/stories/buchananmemo.htm

If it was good enough for Nixon to use against McGovern, it is good enough for Russert to use against Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC